user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
** karma **
Clearly hit a nerve didn't I, I wonder why?
Keep calm Ken, you might burst a blood vessel.
LOL. Great ballot by the way.
I don't think there's ever been a ballot purely about me. There's some Karma coming your way.
"Remember Ken, keep voting for your own ballots. We can see it all in your activity report."
Where does it say "everyday"?
What was it you were accusing ME of again?
If your going to make a ballot accusing someone of lying, try not to do it yourself in the ballot description - it kind of makes the ballot worthless, and it makes you look a little bit silly.
That put an end to your little tantrum didn't it. Run along now little man. LMAO!!
Keep up the spin ken!
And thanks again.
"more lies from Ken From Dublins stalker wolf nipple chips"
Don't flatter yourself.
If anyone can be bothered, just look at kens most recent ballot activity. Since creating this ballot he voted on two of his old ballots.
78558. Who are the most racist race of people on earth?
41973. Where is the oldest building in the world?
It doesn't really bother me, it was afterall a passing comment. But I have to ask, whats the point of making a ballot if your going to twist the voting results with multiple votes? It kind of defeats the object of asking people for their opinion.
...but then again, we have already seen how Ken like to silence opposing viewpoints.
Actually scratch the comment before last, I was looking at the wrong page.
ACtually I will retract that comment. I was under the impression that the page displayed the user activity, not general activity. My apologies.
But my point still stands...
If your going to make a ballot accusing someone of lying, try not to do it yourself in the ballot description - it kind of makes the ballot worthless, and it makes you look a little bit silly.
Personally, I'd like to see you both naked. :) Nummy!
hey hey!!!
You know it Daddy!!! woo hoo... bring on the baby oil..
neothe, shut up!
"entire rabid Bush supporting mob"
But Ken, Widehead, Nipple, and Fiddle don't always agree on U.S. foreign policy. Especially teh first two, in fact, they despise it
by aya on Mon Oct 16, 06 12:53pm
[+]
^But Ken thinks anyone who disagrees with him on 9/11 is a Bush supporter, even if your a liberal living the middle of the countryside in Wiltshire, England.
wolf is right on that Ken does like to accuse people who actually are sane of being Bush administration shills and what not.
After the offer of nudity, what the hell else is there to fight over?? sheesh..
ACtually I will retract that comment. I was under the impression that the page displayed the user activity, not general activity. My apologies.
He's retracted his Lies - good.
Get your facts right in future, not just about this but on 9/11 too. 
"But Ken thinks anyone who disagrees with him on 9/11 is a Bush supporter...." 
by wolf_nipple_chips
Absolutely false again, I shouldn't even bestow upon you the dignity of reciprocal debate seen as you wilfully break the rules and etiquette of debate by going after me personally as soon as your arguments collapse into their own footprints.
Besides anyone isn't just you handful of Bush OCT defenders.
 "You're either with the terrorists, or you're with us."
You and your kind support the Bush administrations conspiracy theory, you defend his administrations lies at every turn, you may as well be spokesmen for them, don't think you lot are fooling anyone, if you're not Bush supporters as you imply, but don't actually state, then you might as well be. 
^No Ken, I just defend the side of logic and rational thought.
"you wilfully break the rules and etiquette of debate by going after me personally"
Thats rich. Every other comment you come out with has some kind of personal insult or attack.
^You don't have to be a Bush support to believe in the offical story or OCT as you call it Ken, the facts support the offical story but you know that already...
"you wilfully break the rules and etiquette of debate by going after me personally"
What like calling you a "Bush shit licking would be piece of Orwellian spyware on legs"
LMAO!
Look at ballot 103420 to see what Ken thinks of the "rules and etiquette of debate".
He even managed to fit the word "evil" in there.
Good enough for you crybabies   - don't dish it out in the first place if you can't take it right back in your face with just desserts for afters 
"^You don't have to be a Bush support to believe in the offical story or OCT as you call it Ken, the facts support the offical (official x 2 - Ken) story but you know that already..."
by Corrupt
 try telling that to the 84% of Americans in the latest New York Times/CBS News poll - who DO NOT BELIEVE what the government says about the attacks on 9/11
"try telling that to the 84% of Americans..."
And so what?
Billions of people believe in God - that doesn't make Him true.
Ken, if you are simply believing in a conspiracy because your mate does just tell us and we can ignore all your posts from now on.
I was kind of hoping you had a point to make. I guess not.
repost:
nobody's falling for it, murderer. you can't protect them. nobody wants to hear your government propaganda.
"try telling that to the 84% of Americans..."
And so what?
by wolf_nipple_chips
You are digging yourself into an ever deeper hole here Nipple, the grave of your own credibility.
Here lies the discredited remains of Wolf_Nipple_Chips 
Like how dare you casually dismiss as irrelevant the heartfelt opinions of 84% of Americans who happen to disagree with you and the likes of that genius neothe1  about the Bush spin of events of that day!
Keep digging!
You'll have dug yourself so far down that you won't be able to scale back up the walls of your own denial.
Ken where did you get you're info from that does not sound quite right.If 84% of the American people don't believe the government's account of 9/11 then why aren't they banging down the W.H door for explanations?
Look do you really expect us to believe that the government that could not cover up a 2bit burgulary at the Watergate Hotel was able to pull off the worst terrorist attack in American history and keep it secret for 5 years?
"how dare you casually dismiss as irrelevant the heartfelt opinions of 84% of Americans who happen to disagree with you"
Because they're wrong.
Use of emotive vocabulary like 'heartfelt' doesn't change a thing. If (and it's a big if) 84% of people believe it - they are totally and utterly wrong.
Millions of people believe in aliens and that they vist earth and sometimes abduct people - they are wrong too.
What pecentage of people belive in God with absolutely no proof whatsoever to back up their claims?
The official explanation of the events on 9-11 doesn't rely on faith (like religious beliefs) for someone to judge if it's true or not - the evidence is there for all to see.
"You are digging yourself into an ever deeper hole here Nipple, the grave of your own credibility."
I never said that. Try reading Ken. LMAO! I never even commented on your 84% percent of American statement.
Thats the second time in a day that you've made something up that I blatantly did't say.
The first being "he claims I've been voting for myself on my own ballots, once a day, every day!"
If your going to make a ballot accusing someone of lying, try not to do it yourself in the ballot description, and throughout the ballot comments - it kind of makes the ballot worthless, and it makes you look a little bit silly.
Yeah...you typed that nonsense already, yet admitted you got it wrong, I don't have to lie to make my points, get your facts right in future okay?
The effrontery of these hypocrites, if that poll had been in their favour - do you think they would be running around here as if their asses were on fire trying to dismiss it?
-NOT A CHANCE IN HELL!
I hadn't even check the poll. I'm sure you acount for about 5 of the votes anyway. LOL!
That wouldn't surprise me, you're not the sharpest tool in the box to put it kindly.
I'll just remind you that it was a New York Times/CBS news poll, you would be one of the 16% minority who swallow bricks, now stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
I was refering to this ballot poll.
With regards to the other poll...
What percentage of that 86% think that the administration actually carried out 9/11 - very few!
"Monday October 16, 2006
A poll conducted last week by the New York Times and CBS news found that just 16% of Americans believe the Bush Administration is telling the truth about what they knew prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States.
Poll participants were asked, "do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?"
53% of respondents indicated they believe the Bush Administration was hiding something, and another 28% reported that they think the administration is mostly lying "when it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States."
The poll didn't ask whether they carried it out, just whether they lied about prior knowledge of "terrorist attacks".
If that was the question, I would have been one of the 86% percent, as I think there is a distinct possibility that they sat back and allowed it to happen.
Try again Ken.
"you would be one of the 16% minority who swallow bricks"
Your wrong, again.
Just because I think your theories are completely irrational, illogical bollocks, don't presume to think that I believe the Bush Admin and the Blair cabinet are anything other than liars.
I'm sorry to shatter your childlike world, where anyone that doesn't believe your theories are Bush supporting shills.
The fact is, you don't have any hard evidence to back up your theories.
Far far more hard evidence than you have to back up Bushes LIES and your own  regurgitation of that same spoon fed LIE nonsense that you insult our intelligence with by trying to sell it to us.
That's why you lose EVERY point and EVERY argument on the subject, the Bush conspiracy theory collapses under even the most cursory of examinations, scientifically and forensically, because it is a LIE from start to finish, you have swallowed that LIE, you are in the 16% minority who are in deep denial of that LIE.
You are in such an extreme form of denial in fact, that you have yet to compose a single sentence on the subject that makes any objective rational sense, and I mean that.
^That's why you refuse to answer every other question I ask regarding hard solid physical evidence.
How can pieces of the boeing airliner be a lie?
How can 89 people who saw a AA silver airliner be a lie?
How can dead bodies be a lie?
How can engine pieces, wheel rims and landing gears be a lie?
How can a 100ft hole in a building be a lie?
How can DNA be a lie?
Well?
Why 'couldn't' any of the above listed by wolf nipple be a lie.
If this was a givernment plan - surely they'd find a way to leave this evidence to make their case more convincing - All the above could have been planned for effect.
Not that they definatly were
|
|
