user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
And no glib BS like "Oh, that could never happen, there are never any good candidates in that party."
If I agree persons stances and think there is a chance he's actually being honest and not simply out to get votes, then I'd vote for him.
Voted : I'm a democrat, loyalty to my party always comes first, no matter what.
Unless the Other candidate was taking a stand for the environment or health or hunger or .... HAHAHA I made myself laugh :p
by Jyl on Wed Oct 18, 06 6:45pm
[+]
Voted : I'm a democrat, I would vote for the person in the other party.
Believe it or not, I actually have voted for Republican candidates.
Although it is hard, since Bush and the Whore Boys took over the Republican Party.
Voted : I'm a democrat, I would vote for the person in the other party.
I did just this thing a few years ago, in the election for my county's Distict Attorney. The Democratic candidate was aneighbor of mine, and one of the coldest witches I've ever had the displeasure of meeting. The GOP candidate I knew as well, though only from a few meetings at social events, and I liked his platform on the issues and his personality a lot better, so I voted for him in the primary. He didn't even win his nomination, so I ended up writing in my own name in the general election.
Voted : I'm an independant/third party, I would vote for the person in the other party.
If someone carries strong political dogmatism, they'll never see the moron in their own party and will vote for them without a second thought.
I would vote for whomever shared my opinions on issues, no matter what party s/he is enrolled, nor whether other people considered him a moron or sensible.
That's a tough question, actually.
Before the blatant rubber- stamp 'enabling' of the past 6 years, I'd have said "I'd vote for the better candidate."
However, the rubber-stamp GOP has shown us that some political parties are mor einterested in keeping their party in power than ... oh ... doing their jobs responsibly and at least providing some oversight/ checks to an out- of- control executive branch.
All things being equal, I'd vote for the candidate. However, in a situation where one political party is obviously out- of- control and on a power trip -- I'd vote for the moron in the opposing party.
Voted : I'm an independant/third party, I would vote for the person in the other party.
I suppose I would support the other candidate if he was Ron Paul. However, a chimp who supports true liberalism is better than a demublican with a Ph.D. anyday.
|
|
