IF 9/11 DIDN'T HAPPEN, WOULD BUSH HAVE BEEN RE-ELECTED?

search this site: search the web:

Don't support major websites, use a small ones like this one!

IF 9/11 DIDN'T HAPPEN, WOULD BUSH HAVE BEEN RE-ELECTED?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

IF 9/11 DIDN'T HAPPEN, WOULD BUSH HAVE BEEN RE-ELECTED?

[+] ballot by keithwood
ACTIVE Thu Oct 19, 06 - Sat Oct 18, 08
As far as I know Bush was re-elected because of 9/11. Terrorism is the only so called strong point the GOP has. If no terrorism attacks took place Bush might not have been elected for the first time; remember in 2000 he was appointed by the supreme court, he never won. The terrorist attacks helped Bush and the Republican party if you think about it. Maybe the neocons and Bush paid Bin Laden to perpetrate them, maybe they are still paying him. Did you ever wonder where all those hundreds of billions of dollars in war funds are going? Remember most of the 9/11 hijackers are Saudi Arabian and not Iraqi, Afghani, or Iranian. Bush and the neocons wanted to make those people look like the terrorists repsonsible in order to defend the Saudis who were also behind it. Now that Moron Dubya created a real terrorist SHITuation in the Middle East and now hes not abke to handle it.

yes
no

Ballot #103670 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

COMMENTS:
Sorry about the typo, abke=able.

by keithwood on Thu Oct 19, 06 5:10pm [+]

Voted : yes
Turd Blossom would've cooked something up.

by Truthseeker013 on Thu Oct 19, 06 5:42pm [+]

Voted : yes
Some kind of external threat - a "Pearl Harbor" event - would have magically occured to create the sense of an external threat, giving Bush the edge he needed to begin his fascist revolution.

by cranky on Thu Oct 19, 06 7:08pm [+]

if there was no 9/11, there would've been no Patriot Act passed (amazingly fast and pre-prepared ahead of time, neh?)

Perhaps today, we would not be seeing the USA as a fascist policestate which ignores international laws, tortures people in secret prisons and in concentration camps, and has laws where any American citizen can be declared an "illegal combatant" and sent off to one of these torture camps without any trial, hearing, or habeus corpus of any kind. DISAPPEARED in other words.

by Lovelynice on Thu Oct 19, 06 7:21pm [+]

Voted : yes
Yup, I'd bet so.

A "fascist policestate"? Now I may not like Bush, I may think he's the worst president I'll see in my lifetime, but the government of the United States today is nowhere close to a fascist police state. Last I checked, I still have all the rights guaranteed me by the constitution. Hell, if this is what a fascist police state really is, it's not nearly as bad as people make it out to be.

That being said, secret prisons and torture are indeed normally the fare of facist police states, and the United States should be disgraced for allowing them.

by himself809 on Thu Oct 19, 06 9:08pm [+]

Voted : no
Without that distraction, and the knee-jerk desire to show national solidarity in face of an 'external enemy,' the nation would have rejected someone who was so clearly unqualified for the office.

by Cathexis on Fri Oct 20, 06 7:49am [+]

Voted : yes
Would have thought so. The weak democratic opposition would still have been the same.

by wolf_nipple_chips on Fri Oct 20, 06 8:02am [+]

Sorry, democrat.

by wolf_nipple_chips on Fri Oct 20, 06 12:06pm [+]

Of course he would have.

And he won in spite of useless pre-election polls showing that he was behind by a wide margin. Which proves what the experts say time and time again, that polls are not reliable.

And so much for the lie that 84% of Americans believe that Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks. A out-right lie that is often told by certain users of this site.

by Jinn_the_Kafir on Fri Oct 20, 06 8:18pm [+]

Voted : no
The antagonist became the protagonist!

by Freon on Fri Oct 20, 06 11:38pm [+]

{And he won in spite of useless pre-election polls...
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Fri Oct 20, 06 8:18pm }

and with the wonderful help of Diebold's totally "easy to hack", not at all slightly secure blackbox voting machines and vote counts of thousands in town where there were only hundreds of voters.

Pre-election polls don't measure vote-rigging.

by Lovelynice on Sat Oct 21, 06 7:32am [+]

{And so much for the lie that 84% of Americans believe that Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks.
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Fri Oct 20, 06 8:18pm }

Prove otherwise then. You say it's a lie, the cite the poll and tell us exactly where it got it wrong Mr Expert Statistician

by Lovelynice on Sat Oct 21, 06 7:34am [+]

It didn't say 84% think the Bush admin was behind 9/11. The poll was about the administrations level of knowledge prior to the terrorist attacks.

by wolf_nipple_chips on Sat Oct 21, 06 3:58pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |