user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : No, Bush has no automatic right to act as a vigilante
Not unless North Koreans launch nukes or something like that.
Voted : No, Bush has no automatic right to act as a vigilante
No single nation has the right to unilaterally interpret and 'enforce' International Law.
Well you can't go around saying you are a "nation of justice and laws" and then turn around and totally disregard the very same international laws you invoke to get your way when another country is doing something you don't like. Wow, sort of like what Bush does! He invokes the rule of international law when ever he feels like it, say with regard to Iran and Korea, but then he himself throws it aside when it pleases him. Americans really need to travel abroad more, or at least talk to foreigners more, becuase our reputation is so in the toilet that it will take an awful lot to get it back. I'm sure some narrow minded Americans will think "big deal." Yeah, it is, because notice how we now have to beg and whine to get international organizations to even take us seriously. Cheney should be depicted as the evil Palpatine in that picture.
Voted : No, Bush has no automatic right to act as a vigilante
Oh, my...
Voted : No, Bush has no automatic right to act as a vigilante
That puts in in the class of a rogue Nation...and that's not good.
*you in the class*
|
|