IRAN 'STEPS UP NUCLEAR PROGRAMME'

user ballots

political :

IRAN 'STEPS UP NUCLEAR PROGRAMME'


[+] serious ballot by herzog
created Fri Oct 27, 06

Iran has reportedly taken another step in its uranium enrichment programme, in defiance of international pressure.

It has activated a second set of centrifuges - the machines used to enrich uranium - the semi-official Isna agency has said.

A BBC correspondent says Iran would need tens of thousands of centrifuges to make industrial-scale nuclear fuel.

The UN Security Council is to debate sanctions after Iran failed to meet an August deadline to stop enrichment.

Iran has not convinced the US and other Western states that its enrichment work is only aimed at generating electricity, and not acquiring nuclear weapons.

There is no doubt that the use of the second cascade of centrifuges will be seen as an act of defiance by the international community at what is a sensitive time, the BBC's Frances Harrison reports from Tehran.

'No secret'

The Iranian report suggested that scientists had injected gas into the second cascade.

Isna quoted its unnamed source as saying the second cascade's "product" had been obtained.

The source said the second cascade had been installed two weeks ago with the knowledge of UN nuclear inspectors.

"The International Atomic Energy Agency has been fully aware of the issue and the inspectors are present in Iran," the source said.

Iran's first cascade, consisting of 168 centrifuges, produced a small quantity of enriched uranium in February.

Iran has said it plans to install 3,000 centrifuges at its nuclear site in Natanz by the end of this year.

BBC

- - - - - -- - - - -- -

How shocked are you that Iran has ignored the UNs deadline and moved ahead with their program as if nothing were in their way?

This is shocking! How could Iran violate a UN mandated deadline?
I saw this coming a long time ago


Ballot #104199 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









COMMENTS:
Not shocked at all.

Iran is not alone in ignoring the UN.

Why should Iran be expected to abide by UN resolutions when near neighbour Israel flagrantly ignores them?
by B_P on Fri Oct 27, 06 9:02am [+]

Technically, they are not breaking any treaties.
by Cathexis on Fri Oct 27, 06 10:07am [+]

Voted : I saw this coming a long time ago
Once more, for effect...

Call me when they've got a nuke, about eight to ten years.
by Truthseeker013 on Fri Oct 27, 06 10:29am [+]

Truth: but we tried the 'lets wait and see' approach with north korea and we know how that turned out. I'm sure there were plenty of people in the LBJ administration who said why worry about those commies, they won't have a nuke for at least 40 years. Well true, but is it fair to stick future generations with problems that you could have solved today?
by herzog on Fri Oct 27, 06 10:46am [+]

"Technically, they are not breaking any treaties."

Technically bush broke no laws by invading Iraq, but that doesn't stop liberals from claiming he invaded 'illegally' simply because world opinion was against it. Double standard?
by herzog on Fri Oct 27, 06 10:46am [+]

I am confused. Isn't Iran a sovereign nation? Why can't they build as many centrifuges as they wish without external meddling? Why can the U.S. build and maintain as many nukes as it wishes while screaming bloody murder when someother sovereign nation does the same? Well, I'm confused.
by margaret123 on Fri Oct 27, 06 11:37am [+]

Marge: because Iran is a nation led by fanatical muslims with close ties to other fanatical muslims that routinely attack the US.

Is there some overriding law handed down from god himself that specifically forbids Iran from developing nukes? No.

Is it in americas, and the worlds best interest to stop them? Absolutely.

There was no law saying the germans weren't allowed to massacre all the jews they liked, but I still think it would have been best for the US or britain to intervene when they were doing this, even before the start of the war. Don't you?
by herzog on Fri Oct 27, 06 11:46am [+]

herz: Just out of curiosity ... do you really believe that to be anywhere near an accurate anology?

I suggest proofreading before clicking Submit.
by Cathexis on Fri Oct 27, 06 12:36pm [+]

Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle.
by Cathexis on Fri Oct 27, 06 12:37pm [+]

"Routinely attacked"

I suggest you get a dictionary herzog
by elvislennon on Fri Oct 27, 06 1:12pm [+]

run for your lives, we're being routinely attacked
by elvislennon on Fri Oct 27, 06 1:13pm [+]

Cath, why yes, yes I do. And if you could find a reason why it isn't I'd like to hear it.

"Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle"


So you feel that those who claim Iran has a right to have nukes because the US also has them are devoid of any principles? I agree, those people are wrong.
by herzog on Fri Oct 27, 06 1:19pm [+]

Elvis: ou‧tine  /ruˈtin/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a customary or regular course of procedure.
2. commonplace tasks, chores, or duties as must be done regularly or at specified intervals; typical or everyday activity: the routine of an office.
3. regular, unvarying, habitual, unimaginative, or rote procedure.
4. an unvarying and constantly repeated formula, as of speech or action; convenient or predictable response: Don't give me that brotherly-love routine!

There you go.
by herzog on Fri Oct 27, 06 1:20pm [+]

I notice Herzog didn't respond to my post.

Wonder why that is?
by B_P on Fri Oct 27, 06 2:09pm [+]

I didn't notice it, that's all.

And I think cathexis was refering to your comment when he stated in no uncertain terms "Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle."

The fact is that Iran and ISrael are not the same country. Iran is a radical nation that funds terrorism, Israel isn't. Iran is a very real threat to the US and the west, not directly but through terrorist activities, Israel isn't.

Criticism of Iran and efforts to stop their nuclear program are based on very real threats they pose and a desire to not see millions killed in acts of nuclear terrorism, criticism of Israel is largely based on anti-semitism from the largely pro-arab factions in the UN.
by herzog on Sat Oct 28, 06 12:12pm [+]

Herzog, define terrorism.
by England_Patriot on Thu Dec 07, 06 3:29am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved