user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Not shocked at all. Iran is not alone in ignoring the UN. Why should Iran be expected to abide by UN resolutions when near neighbour Israel flagrantly ignores them?
by B_P on Fri Oct 27, 06 9:02am
[+]
Technically, they are not breaking any treaties.
Voted : I saw this coming a long time ago
Once more, for effect... Call me when they've got a nuke, about eight to ten years.
Truth: but we tried the 'lets wait and see' approach with north korea and we know how that turned out. I'm sure there were plenty of people in the LBJ administration who said why worry about those commies, they won't have a nuke for at least 40 years. Well true, but is it fair to stick future generations with problems that you could have solved today?
"Technically, they are not breaking any treaties." Technically bush broke no laws by invading Iraq, but that doesn't stop liberals from claiming he invaded 'illegally' simply because world opinion was against it. Double standard?
I am confused. Isn't Iran a sovereign nation? Why can't they build as many centrifuges as they wish without external meddling? Why can the U.S. build and maintain as many nukes as it wishes while screaming bloody murder when someother sovereign nation does the same? Well, I'm confused.
Marge: because Iran is a nation led by fanatical muslims with close ties to other fanatical muslims that routinely attack the US. Is there some overriding law handed down from god himself that specifically forbids Iran from developing nukes? No. Is it in americas, and the worlds best interest to stop them? Absolutely. There was no law saying the germans weren't allowed to massacre all the jews they liked, but I still think it would have been best for the US or britain to intervene when they were doing this, even before the start of the war. Don't you?
herz: Just out of curiosity ... do you really believe that to be anywhere near an accurate anology? I suggest proofreading before clicking Submit.
Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle.
"Routinely attacked" I suggest you get a dictionary herzog
run for your lives, we're being routinely attacked
Cath, why yes, yes I do. And if you could find a reason why it isn't I'd like to hear it. "Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle" So you feel that those who claim Iran has a right to have nukes because the US also has them are devoid of any principles? I agree, those people are wrong.
Elvis: ou‧tine /ruˈtin/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. a customary or regular course of procedure. 2. commonplace tasks, chores, or duties as must be done regularly or at specified intervals; typical or everyday activity: the routine of an office. 3. regular, unvarying, habitual, unimaginative, or rote procedure. 4. an unvarying and constantly repeated formula, as of speech or action; convenient or predictable response: Don't give me that brotherly-love routine! There you go.
I notice Herzog didn't respond to my post. Wonder why that is?
by B_P on Fri Oct 27, 06 2:09pm
[+]
I didn't notice it, that's all. And I think cathexis was refering to your comment when he stated in no uncertain terms "Plus, I have to admit, I find the whole "If so-and-so can do it, we can" argument to be devoid of anything approaching principle." The fact is that Iran and ISrael are not the same country. Iran is a radical nation that funds terrorism, Israel isn't. Iran is a very real threat to the US and the west, not directly but through terrorist activities, Israel isn't. Criticism of Iran and efforts to stop their nuclear program are based on very real threats they pose and a desire to not see millions killed in acts of nuclear terrorism, criticism of Israel is largely based on anti-semitism from the largely pro-arab factions in the UN.
Herzog, define terrorism.
|
|