WESTERN MEDIA RAN WITH AN OBVIOUSLY FALSIFIED ATROCITY STORY FROM IRAQ

user ballots

news related :

WESTERN MEDIA RAN WITH AN OBVIOUSLY FALSIFIED ATROCITY STORY FROM IRAQ


[+] serious ballot by herzog
created Tue Nov 28, 06

The news that six Sunnis were captured by Shiites, doused with kerosine and burned alive, was too sensational to not be picked up by the mainstream media. But it turns out that the event never happened. Furthermore, the Iraqi "spokesman" relied on to give all information regarding this event is as fictional as the story itself.

Jamil Hussein, the man news reports called "police Capt. Jamil Hussein," was the source for all information regarding the burning. Although he is mentioned by USA Today, the Associated Press, CBS News, and other outlets, Central Command says no such person exists. Centcom also asked the Associated Press to retract the story unless it has proof beyond Jamil Hussein's word.

Flopping Aces has a press release from Centcom, which is in charge of all U.S. forces in the Middle East.

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Dear Associated Press:

On Nov. 24, 2006, your organization published an article by Qais Al-Bashir about six Sunnis being burned alive in the presence of Iraqi Police officers. This news item, which is below, received an enormous amount of coverage internationally.

We at Multi-National Corps - Iraq made it known through MNC-I Press Release Number 20061125-09 and our conversations with your reporters that neither we nor Baghdad Police had any reports of such an incident after investigating it and could find no one to corroborate the story. A couple of hours ago, we learned something else very important. We can tell you definitively that the primary source of this story, police Capt. Jamil Hussein, is not a Baghdad police officer or an MOI employee. We verified this fact with the MOI through the Coalition Police Assistance Training Team.

Also, we definitely know, as we told you several weeks ago through the MNC-I Media Relations cell, that another AP-popular IP spokesman, Lt. Maithem Abdul Razzaq, supposedly of the city’s Yarmouk police station, does not work at that police station and is also not authorized to speak on behalf of the IP. The MOI has supposedly issued a warrant for his questioning.

I know we have informed you that there exists an MOI edict that no one below the level of chief is authorized to be an Iraqi Police spokesperson. An unauthorized IP spokesperson will get fired for talking to the media. While I understand the importance of a news agency to use anonymous and unauthorized sources, it is still incumbent upon them to make sure their facts are straight. Was this information verified by anyone else? If the source providing the information is lying about his name, then he ought not to be represented as an official IP spokesperson and should be listed as an anonymous source.

Unless you have a credible source to corroborate the story of the people being burned alive, we respectfully request that AP issue a retraction, or a correction at a minimum, acknowledging that the source named in the story is not who he claimed he was. MNC-I and MNF-I are always available and willing to verify events and provide as much information as possible when asked.

Very respectfully,
LT XXXXXX

XXXX X XXXXXXXX
Lieutenant, U.S. Navy
MNC-I Joint Operations Center
Public Affairs Officer

- - - - - - - - - - -- -

This seems like the whole situation could have been prevented with a 5 minute phone call.

Do you think this amounts to simple carelessness and the media is merely incompetent, or do you beleive they intentionally don't check their facts too carefully if the story is appealing to them?

Careless incomptence
Intentionally negligent bias
WMD's & MISSION ACCOMPLISHED


Ballot #106020 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
106095. Rightwing media ran with an obviously falsified story about Nancy Pelosi
64366. Should this atrocity be recieving more media attention?
103463. Is it hypocritical of Muslim countries to complain about Western media?
111382. Should the media include all relevent facts in a story, even if . . .
115333. Why has the liberal media not covered the story of Venezuelan protests?
84642. Do you believe what the media tells you about Iraq or do you actually ASK a service member what is going on there to get a better viewpoint?
106285. CENTCOM requests that the media use real sources when reporting on Iraq
40724. MEDIA BIAS-What's worst MASS GRAVES in Iraq or the PRISON ABUSE SCANDAL?
61446. Why is it that when CBS, a neutral media source, makes an honest mistake about George W. Bush, it's because "the media is liberal" ...
32823. Yes/No, should the French be allowed to participate in rebuilding Iraq eventhough they have decided not to no longer commit troops to Iraq?


COMMENTS:
Voted : Intentionally negligent bias
These stories come out too often for it to be mere carelessness.

They're incompetent to be sure, but I suspect there is more than a little willfull ignorance when these things are being printed.

Find a story you don't like, scrutinize it to death. Find one you like, just don't look to in to it too carefully and you haven't technically lied.
by herzog on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:57am [+]

Guess we must ask Chris Rock.
by Black_Lava on Tue Nov 28, 06 11:19am [+]

There's actually nothing going on in Iraq. It's fun and games and Disney will be openning a theme park soon--you sould go for a visit.
by elvislennon on Tue Nov 28, 06 11:37am [+]

Wow! I'm sure that there most be hundreds of positive stories about Iraq and how the Iraqis are getting along so well right now.
by aya on Tue Nov 28, 06 3:20pm [+]

Aya: if you believe the situation is bad, does that mean it's ok to invent further bad stories to push your case?


Don't you think it's wrong for the media to present stories that have not been checked in the least simply because they want to push an agenda?
by herzog on Tue Nov 28, 06 3:51pm [+]

I hate this response that is standard whenever the media comes out with another lie, fabrication or distortion.

The Al Gore defense of "false but accurate", is a horrible approach to the news.

Lies are lies, regardless of how much you wish they were true.
by herzog on Tue Nov 28, 06 3:52pm [+]

Voted : Intentionally negligent bias
Can I go home now?
by Truthseeker013 on Tue Nov 28, 06 5:03pm [+]

The media's aim is to get as much of a shocking story as possible. The more shocking, the more likely they can sell their stories.

The situation in Iraq is shocking and bad enough as it is. One shouldn't have to lie to reinforce that. One should be honest, otherwise it backfires and your agenda looks deceitful. Rather than fabricating things, just be honest about it. It's one thing to have a bias, it's another thing altogether to promote that bias with lies.
by xxxxxxxx on Tue Nov 28, 06 10:13pm [+]

Aya: if you believe the situation is bad, does that mean it's ok to invent further bad stories to push your case?

Of course not, but do you think that Fox news is any different?

Lies are lies, regardless of how much you wish they were true.

HOw true of the Iraq war, no matter HOW much one wants to believe that the West is spreading democracy, eh?
by aya on Wed Nov 29, 06 6:57am [+]

" Of course not, but do you think that Fox news is any different?"

What does foxnews have to do with this story? Unless you're saying it's ok if the other guy is doing it? Besides which, can you find evidence of foxnews the equivalent of running with newsstories thought up by jihadis and not bothering to check them? Fox is everyones favorite scapegoat but for all their bias they dont' lie like the majority of the mainstream media does, and I've challenged numerous people to find examples where they lied and all turned up nothing.

by herzog on Wed Nov 29, 06 3:26pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved