search this site: search the web:
Do you like half baked websites? You'll love it here! Sign up now!

SHOULD MARK MCGWIRE BE IN THE MLB HALL OF FAME?

user ballots

sports :

SHOULD MARK MCGWIRE BE IN THE MLB HALL OF FAME?


[+] serious ballot by jappy
ACTIVE Mon Dec 04, 06 - Sat Aug 29, 09

Mark McGwire broke the long standing single season home run record after a neck and neck race with Sammy Sosa, bashing long balls for several months, in some ways bringing baseball back from the brink of extinction.

A few years later, the steroid scandal breaks, and McGwire is dragged into the muck even though he was retired at the time, for at least having used a substance that, while not banned at the time, is now banned from use in Major League Baseball.

Looking at his body of work, on the basis of his numbers alone, his entry into the Hall of Fame is a no brainer, he is easily a first ballot entry.

So, should McGwire be voted into the Hall Of Fame this year, this being the first year he is eligible? Does his use of a performance enhancing substance effectively ruin your opinion of him? Or is it unfair to hold him to standards that weren't in place when he was playing the game? If McGwire is to be subjected to scrutiny based on new rules, should all players currently in the Hall of Fame also be looked at again the same way?

Yes, he should be voted in, first ballot.
Yes, he should be voted in, not in the first year though.
No, he should never be voted in, because his numbers aren't good enough.
No, he shouldn't be voted in, because of the steroids scandal
Don't know
No. If it wasn't illegal at the time, then it doesn't count. Laws are not retroactive.


Ballot #106361 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
68223. Should there be a B&W / LO Hall of Fame?
122819. Where is the Cockroach Hall of Fame located?
126527. Who Should Be In The Rock N Roll Hall Of Fame Who Isn't In There?
113076. Should Rose's admission get him into the BaseBall Hall of Fame?
125710. Madonna: First Professional Lip-Sycher In Hall Of Fame!
73177. Should Right Said Fred be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?
87028. When Roger Clemens goes to the Hall of Fame, which team's cap should be on his plaque?
89790. Should Steve Bartman be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame?
100329. Troy Aikmen in the Pro Football Hall of Fame? OMG, are they crazy!?1?
9313. Of the following, which would you most likely do to achieve fame and fortune?


COMMENTS:
if it wasn't illegal when he was playing, he shouldn't be penalized.

although wasn't he the one who testified in congress and swore up and down that he didn't take any steroids?
by LCD on Mon Dec 04, 06 12:46pm [+]

He didn't exactly say he didn't take steroids, he just sort of, used 'politician speak' to skirt the question.
by jappy on Mon Dec 04, 06 12:48pm [+]

Voted : Yes, he should be voted in, first ballot.
They'll never know, for sure, who was juicing and who wasn't, or for how long or how much. Plus, the owners turned a blind eye as long as the players were producing.

I say judge him by his stats, not by what he might have been doing. Despite the bans, the world of juicing has just begun, not ended. Eventually, everyone will be doing it, but it will be controlled.
by cranky on Mon Dec 04, 06 2:37pm [+]

Voted : No, he shouldn't be voted in, because of the steroids scandal
If, when he was in front of the Congressional committee, he'd done more than plead the Fifth, I'd be behind him. He acted like he had something to hide, and damned himself in my eyes.
by Truthseeker013 on Mon Dec 04, 06 5:41pm [+]

Voted : Don't know
Only if his performance before supplement use warrants it.
by thc2883 on Tue Dec 05, 06 5:28am [+]

Voted : Don't know
Legally, like Barry Bonds, it's never been proven he used steriods.

So he is innocent until proven guilty.

But then the HOF election process is not a legal process. It is not an objective body. It is subject to politics, favoratism, cronyism, and discrimination.

BASEBALL NEWS WRITERS are the voters, so it is not an objective process.
by Grapost on Tue Dec 05, 06 6:49am [+]

C'mon Man pay attention to the numbers/ He played a position that is full of players better than him.
yeah he had a 583 HR's but he also only had 1600 hits and that is terrible for a HOF first basemen. He is in only in the top 10 in only
one of the main categories used to determine great hitters, and you say a shoe-in for a first time ballot? He was a great slugger but not a great overall hitter. I don't think his numbers are good enough for a first time ballot. The HR's might get him in the HOF, but that is the only number he has going for him.
by Guest User from [204.9.35.208] on Mon Mar 05, 07 1:10pm [+]

NO Way, I mean in what way is he even rememberable in baseball for except his steriod power homeruns, hmm ???
by Guest User from [72.85.61.52] on Mon Sep 10, 07 6:35pm [+]

Voted : Yes, he should be voted in, not in the first year though.
who cares baseball sucks anyway unless its the playoffs
by Guest User from [74.129.98.234] on Wed Sep 26, 07 3:18pm [+]

Voted : No, he should never be voted in, because his numbers aren't good enough.
He has the 2nd FEWEST number of hits of all other Hall Of Famers.

NO!
by Grapost on Wed Feb 13, 08 10:19am [+]

Voted : No. If it wasn't illegal at the time, then it doesn't count. Laws are not retroactive.
Besides, he's anti-spanking so I'll defend him to the death...
by Psycho_Frighead on Sat Mar 22, 08 10:54pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved