search this site: search the web:
Best and Worst.com: Where the best can show their worst and the worst can show their best.

HILLARY CLINTON WOULD DEFINITELY LOSE IN 2008, SO WHO'S A BETTER CHOICE?

user ballots

prediction : political :

HILLARY CLINTON WOULD DEFINITELY LOSE IN 2008, SO WHO'S A BETTER CHOICE?


[+] serious ballot by jappy
ACTIVE Mon Dec 04, 06 - Sat Aug 29, 09

Recent polls have showed that, should Hillary Clinton secure the Democratic nomination for the 2008 presidential election, anywhere from 49% to 58% "would definitely NOT vote for Clinton" in the 2008 election.

With that being said, who would be a better choice to run in the 2008 election for the Democratic party?

Bob Kerry
Edward Kennedy
Gary Coleman
Troy Aikman
Lou Dobbs
Joe Lieberman
Pat Buchanan
Wesley Clark
Dan Quayle
Dr. Ruth
Ralph Nadar
Ron Paul
John Edwards
Dr. Phil


Ballot #106380 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









COMMENTS:
Whoever it is, the Democrats won't select him or her. There hasn't been a Democratic presidential candidate who got more than 50% of the popular vote since Jimmy Carter (and that was barely). Yep folks, Bill Clinton never received more than 50% in either of his campaigns. The last Democrat to handily win more than 50%? Lyndon Johnson... Only 42 years ago. The last Republicans? George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon. I'm just hoping maybe this time Democrats can select someone that people like (not wooden candidates like John Kerry) and who can be a.... uhm ... a person who can maintain better control over themselves by thinking with the brain in their skull.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Dec 04, 06 10:23pm [+]

Sorry to break the bad news, but the fix is in. She already has her bags packed.
by _Beelzebubba on Thu Jan 17, 08 9:14am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved