user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Conference attendees included former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard and white nationalist ideologue David Duke, discredited French academic Robert Faurisson, Moshe Aryeh Friedman, leader of The Orthodox Anti-Zionist Society of Austria and holocaust denier Fredrick Töben of Australia.
source: wikipedia/BBC news
Voted : Various disgraced 'academics' and the klu klux clan
They won't let one Arab attend (he says the Holocaust occurred) because he holds an Israeli passport.
Are lovelynice and tank_girl attending?
Voted : Various disgraced 'academics' and the klu klux clan
a bunch of psycho's.
Voted : serious academics and historians
Blind hunters with lasers
Voted : Various disgraced 'academics' and the klu klux clan
what's their real point? Isn't the future more important than the past right now?
People will do ANYTHING but stop fighting, I have lost hope completely.
by Jyl on Wed Dec 13, 06 3:20pm
[+]
** karma **
{The Orthodox Anti-Zionist Society of Austria...
by wideheadofknowledge on Wed Dec 13, 06 8:59am}
So what?
They disagree with Zionism. Big deal.
I can see that would make them enemies of a pro-Zionist group, but the rest of us don't have to tag along with the pro-zionists point of view about it.
it sounds like you're trying to pretend that they're bad simply because they disagree with your side.
{holocaust denier Fredrick Töben of Australia...
by wideheadofknowledge on Wed Dec 13, 06 8:59am}
When is having a different point of a view on any event a crime in and of itself? Unless of course you hate free speech, or you hate the idea of someone possibly questioning and the "official history"
They do that in North Korea too; imprisoning people for questioning "official history"
There's a Chinese historian rotting away in a prison in China now, all his books were burnt, because he happened to say "The Nanking Massacre deathtoll was inflated by ten times by the Communist Party of China". He disagreed with the "official history", so therefore he's a bad guy right?
In any nation where historians are not allowed to disagree, but must accept the Official History because they may be imprisoned, their children and families lives threatened, their careers ruined, or their own lives threatened, the "Official History" is clearly going to be biased.
Deny it all you like, but the credibility of any historian who lives in a nation where these circumstance prevail, is not going to be very good, and should be questioned - and the same goes for anything that they might say.
You understand that the 'official history' was arrived at from the work of thousands of historians and researchers over many, many years following different lines of study and pieces of evidence that all converged on the sam conclusion don't you?
To suggest otherwise is simply ignorant.
|
|
