COMMENTS:
Voted : Inaccurate
Partisan bias, undoubtedly.
It's certainly inaccurate as a generalisation, since the media whores itself to public opinion. If the majority of listeners/readers wanted jingoism, they'd get it.
Also, rednecks are too busy breeding with their relatives to learn how to read.
Voted : Other
The "liberal" media doesn't seem that biased to me, but then neither does what I've read on Al Jazeera up to now. I do read news from different countries just to see what they have to say.
Voted : Accurate and inaccurate
If they didn't cherry pick the work force there'd be more of this behind the scenes >>>
YOU VALUE YOUR JOB F*CKER????
JUST SAY WHAT THE HELL *I* TELL YOU TO SAY !!!!!
Voted : Very inaccurate
If it *were* actually "liberal", them Mister Bush would *never* have come to blight our great nation's reputation.
There is no liberal media, and Fox is not a conservative mouthpiece. Fair to say? Really shouldn't say one without saying the other :)
Pay no attention to that liberal behind the media.
Voted : Very inaccurate
The media is mostly leftist, not liberal.
^ I'm amazed that thc2883 took herzog's dick out of his mouth for long enough to post that moronic comment...
^How else could I place it in your mother's rectum?
Got some sand in your vagina?
Voted : Inaccurate
Liberal, sometimes.
Zionist, always.
"How else could I place it in your mother's rectum?"
So you fuck corpses then, thc?
most of the news y'all are getting is for brain-washed idiots, but it's cute watching you fight about what you think is reality :p what you get form your tubes, lol
by Jyl on Mon Jan 08, 07 10:05pm
[+]
|
