search this site: search the web:
7 out of 100 Eliot Spitzer's Hookers recommend bestandworst.com!

EU SUGGESTS BANNING SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES IN ALL 27 MEMBER COUNTRIES?

user ballots

EU SUGGESTS BANNING SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES IN ALL 27 MEMBER COUNTRIES?


[+] serious ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Tue Jan 30, 07

"EU-wide public smoking ban urged
The European Union's 27 member states are being urged to do more to turn Europe into a smoke-free zone.
Health Commissioner Markos Kyprianou raised the prospect of EU-wide legislation to achieve this goal, as he launched a public debate in Brussels.

Officials say passive smoking kills 79,000 Europeans per year - about one in nine of all tobacco-related deaths.

Ireland was the first EU country to ban smoking in all indoor public spaces and the UK will follow suit this year.

Some other EU countries have introduced partial bans, which allow smoking rooms in bars and restaurants.


A poll published last year suggested that smoking bans were popular in countries where they had been introduced.



Overall, more than 80% of respondents across the EU said they favoured a ban in all public indoor spaces - though the figure dropped to 61% when respondents were asked specifically if they supported a ban in bars.
Imperial Tobacco, the maker of John Player, Davidoff and West cigarettes, said there was insufficient scientific evidence to establish that "other people's tobacco smoke is a cause of any disease".

"Where regulations are introduced, we support those that accommodate both smokers and non-smokers and therefore retain an element of freedom and choice," the company said.

Following suit

But health experts urged the EU to do more than introduce public smoking bans, and to actively help smokers to give up.


EUROPEAN SMOKING BANS
Ban in all enclosed public spaces: Ireland, and from 1 July the UK
Ban with exception for sealed, ventilated smoking rooms: Italy, Malta, Sweden, and from 1 June Estonia and Finland
Ban with other kinds of exception in hospitality sector: Belgium, Cyprus, Lithuania, Slovenia, Spain
Source: European Commission


Ireland's ban, the first in the EU, was introduced in 2004. Scotland has already followed suit, and the rest of the UK will step into line on 1 July.
Italy, Sweden, and Malta have partial bans which allow smoking in closed-off, separately ventilated areas.

Estonia and Finland are introducing similar measures later this year. France will follow suit next year after introducing a ban on smoking in offices, hospitals, schools and shops on Thursday this week.

Belgium, Lithuania, Spain, Cyprus, Slovenia and the Netherlands all provide exceptions of different kinds for the hospitality sector.

Most member states ban or restrict smoking in buildings such as hospitals, schools, government buildings, theatres, cinemas and public transport.

There are other countries, however, such as Germany, which have no plans for a smoking ban.

Mr Kyprianou sketched a number of options for increasing the use of smoke-free zones.

These include:

- Allowing the current trend towards introduction of smoke-free zones to continue haphazardly
- Self-regulation, whereby stakeholders such as governments, NGOs and businesses set voluntary targets
- Non-binding recommendations from the European Commission
- Binding legislation from the European Commission

Mr Kyprianou is thought to be in favour of legislation.

"The goal of the green paper is to promote debate on the issue and to seek views from government, MEPs and other interested parties on what role if any the EU could play," Mr Kyprianou's spokesman said."

(Source: BBC)


- Do you think the European Union should have the right to force member states to enforce smoking bans in public places?

Yes, of course it should
No, not at all
Tobacco should be banned..PERIOD - ANYWHERE!
No, but the EU should have a right to take a position


Ballot #111742 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
92038. Arkansas has banned smoking in nearly all public places, ARKANSAS???
101601. Do You Support Banning Cigarettes in Public Establishments?
68333. Public Smoking rant
90147. My worry about banning abortion: it could start a dangerous precedent of banning things simply because a certain group finds it morally wrong.
74282. Should bad karma be given to users who want to petition for banning ballots that are for petitions for banning karma complaint ballots?
111849. why does someone keep banning these new users?
123452. Rihanna banning umbrellas
73303. Would you like to see a petition for banning karma complaint ballots?
95365. Why is Bush putting forth an amendment banning same sex marriage now?
95444. Heterosexual married people: How does banning gay marriage "protect" you?


COMMENTS:
Voted : No, not at all
Not unless they intend to turn the EU into a nation-state.
by xxxxxxxx on Tue Jan 30, 07 8:30am [+]

Voted : No, not at all
"Not unless they intend to turn the EU into a nation-state." I think this is on their long term agenda, and i dont think it will work. Personally i love the smell of tobacco in a pub, the way it stings my eyes...
by winston on Tue Jan 30, 07 8:35am [+]

Tobacco is the *THE* dumbest-ass drug everrrr!
Costs you the Earth,
costs your lungs your LIFE,
and you get sweet FA for it!

Crimonz, if you wanna smoke something, smoke Pot.
at least you get a "high" for your money
but for Tobacco, all you get is your money in their pocket
and dead lungs. How cool is THAT?
- not very.

BAN IT! immediately.
It's a crime against all humanity that it is still legal.
by aplmac on Tue Jan 30, 07 8:40am [+]

Voted : No, not at all
More forced globalization.


Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

They're turning the whole continent into a bunch of pussy Belgians.
by _Beelzebubba on Tue Jan 30, 07 8:59am [+]

Voted : No, not at all
but it certanly has the right to suggest them
by seamus on Tue Jan 30, 07 8:59am [+]

_Beelzebubba - The EU has its capital in Brussels, however Belgium right now has a very relaxed stance on smoking in public. So this would be changing Belgium too.
by xxxxxxxx on Tue Jan 30, 07 9:09am [+]

seamus- "it certanly has the right to suggest them"

Well...

"Mr Kyprianou (Health Commissioner) sketched a number of options for increasing the use of smoke-free zones.

These include:

- Allowing the current trend towards introduction of smoke-free zones to continue haphazardly
- Self-regulation, whereby stakeholders such as governments, NGOs and businesses set voluntary targets
- Non-binding recommendations from the European Commission
- Binding legislation from the European Commission

Mr Kyprianou is thought to be in favour of legislation."

- So he is in favour of a binding legislation from the EU commission then.
by xxxxxxxx on Tue Jan 30, 07 9:12am [+]

a town in california is considering passing a law making it illegal to smoke in your own home. now, you can't smoke any place in public -- not even in an outdoor park. the new law would make it illegal to smoke in apartment buildings or condo's if units are attached to each other. wtf is going on? what's next? enough of this government intrusion.
by Kev24 on Tue Jan 30, 07 10:22am [+]

latimes. com /news /local/ la-me-belmont 29jan29,0,7656220.s tory?coll=la-home-local
by Kev24 on Tue Jan 30, 07 10:24am [+]

WHAT is the big problem with globally illegalizing Tobacco??
Because it's a *North* American drug?

Would the economies of N. and S. Carolina fail?
What about Virginia and Kentucky?
What would happen to those Tobacco farmers?
Is THIS why it's still legal?

Do we continue to Just Say NO to SOUTH American Drugs,
but North American drugs like Alcohol and tobacco are okay, somehow?

If Tobacco were the indigenous cash crop of the high Andes,
and Cannabis was the entrenched crop of East USA,
what would be the legal situation today??
by aplmac on Tue Jan 30, 07 1:23pm [+]

aplmac- The focus of this ballot is not whether or not smoking should be banned in public places (that's a completely different discussion altogether), but rather the issue of whether the EU should have the power of its 27 member nations to enforce such a thing. It is not so much the ban itself- but rather who is doing that banning, and whether they have the right to do so.
by xxxxxxxx on Wed Jan 31, 07 12:05am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved