user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : No, not at all
Not unless they intend to turn the EU into a nation-state.
Voted : No, not at all
"Not unless they intend to turn the EU into a nation-state." I think this is on their long term agenda, and i dont think it will work. Personally i love the smell of tobacco in a pub, the way it stings my eyes...
Tobacco is the *THE* dumbest-ass drug everrrr! Costs you the Earth, costs your lungs your LIFE, and you get sweet FA for it! Crimonz, if you wanna smoke something, smoke Pot. at least you get a "high" for your money but for Tobacco, all you get is your money in their pocket and dead lungs. How cool is THAT? - not very. BAN IT! immediately. It's a crime against all humanity that it is still legal.
Voted : No, not at all
More forced globalization. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. They're turning the whole continent into a bunch of pussy Belgians.
Voted : No, not at all
but it certanly has the right to suggest them
_Beelzebubba - The EU has its capital in Brussels, however Belgium right now has a very relaxed stance on smoking in public. So this would be changing Belgium too.
seamus- "it certanly has the right to suggest them" Well... "Mr Kyprianou (Health Commissioner) sketched a number of options for increasing the use of smoke-free zones. These include: - Allowing the current trend towards introduction of smoke-free zones to continue haphazardly - Self-regulation, whereby stakeholders such as governments, NGOs and businesses set voluntary targets - Non-binding recommendations from the European Commission - Binding legislation from the European Commission Mr Kyprianou is thought to be in favour of legislation." - So he is in favour of a binding legislation from the EU commission then.
a town in california is considering passing a law making it illegal to smoke in your own home. now, you can't smoke any place in public -- not even in an outdoor park. the new law would make it illegal to smoke in apartment buildings or condo's if units are attached to each other. wtf is going on? what's next? enough of this government intrusion.
latimes. com /news /local/ la-me-belmont 29jan29,0,7656220.s tory?coll=la-home-local
WHAT is the big problem with globally illegalizing Tobacco?? Because it's a *North* American drug? Would the economies of N. and S. Carolina fail? What about Virginia and Kentucky? What would happen to those Tobacco farmers? Is THIS why it's still legal? Do we continue to Just Say NO to SOUTH American Drugs, but North American drugs like Alcohol and tobacco are okay, somehow? If Tobacco were the indigenous cash crop of the high Andes, and Cannabis was the entrenched crop of East USA, what would be the legal situation today??
aplmac- The focus of this ballot is not whether or not smoking should be banned in public places (that's a completely different discussion altogether), but rather the issue of whether the EU should have the power of its 27 member nations to enforce such a thing. It is not so much the ban itself- but rather who is doing that banning, and whether they have the right to do so.
|
|