COMMENTS:
who are you referring to?
by LCD on Thu Feb 01, 07 3:00pm
[+]
well today it was i-feel-sick-darling. the other day it was guestspeaker.
they were both wandering_idiot's aliases.
as soon as they revealed themselves, they were expelled. Good job by the way - whoever did it.
by LCD on Thu Feb 01, 07 3:11pm
[+]
Voted : some boring person is banning them
I didn't know veterans were doing this but if they are they need to stop because we do need some fresh voices and new ballot topics.
that bullshit lcd. you let other people stay who write far worse things on here. how do you know it was him? and big deal. apply that policy across the board then.
because I saw that they made a ballot saying that he was wandering idiot.
what the hell is your problem today? got off the wrong side of the bed this morning?
by LCD on Thu Feb 01, 07 3:28pm
[+]
^ no, just decided today i had enough of your hypocricy. don't make me comb through all your comments and ballots and private messages to make me prove it in public.
and by the way, i happen to think he is a nice guy.
I have the stance that if someone has been banned in the past for site abuse, then that is enough of a reason for banning any aliases.
If it is not the case, they should be given the benefit of the doubt.
"and by the way, i happen to think he is a nice guy."
you are entitled to your opinions.
just don't post thousands of abusive ballots like your friend, or you too will be expelled. I am very "consistent" on that policy.
by LCD on Thu Feb 01, 07 4:24pm
[+]
I was wondering about this, I hadn't noticed anything these users did that was against the rules. Seems like banning everyone on suspicion that they are another user that you didn't like is a little dictatorial.
Voted : If the user is proven guilty, then out the window without opening it,you go...
I'll take dictatorial over race baiting any day...
If the users are PROVEN to be veteran abusers of the site then of course they deserve to be removed, AGAIN...
^ really? so you're only concerned with race baiting? you don't care about anti gay comments? how about derogotory comments about religion? how about ones against women? so which is it? is there any guidelines, or just random enforcement?
Sorry Babs, I quite like you since your reincarnation, but...
You clearly only care about derogatory remarks against black people, and I would guess this is due to (understandably) your opwn life experiences.
It still isnt fair of you though.
Voted : If the user is proven guilty, then out the window without opening it,you go...
To Kev24, I address the issue of race because there are a few race baiters on this site (I am very please to see that for the most part many of them are no longer here)that continues to make outlandish claims against people of color and quite frankly it has gotten way out of hand.
As for attacks against gays, women and other targeted groups by users on this site (which many of these moronic losers are no longer taking up valuable space on this site)I have stepped up to the plate in the defense of gays, women and others in many of my previous ballots and commentaries, I don't half step on the issue of racism, bigotry, sexsism, and all the other "ism." I relish moments of going up against the filth of society, most are cowards at heart...
As for your comments DD, your opinion, however, thanks for the left handed compliment...
BTW, I still stand by my previous comment regarding the ballot question... Good talking to you boys...
*L* You fall under that same category of race baiting BBC. I have yet to see you make a comment that isn't pure folly on a ballot that discusses anything remotely racial. You take the far other end of the spectrum, maybe even further out there than the one person I know you are accusing.
I ask you, what do you think of the NAACP, like it? If your answer is what I think it will be, that will prove my point right there.
I had no idea this was going on. What are we going to do?
What did I Feel Sick do to get banned? I thought he was okay.
by mojo on Fri Feb 02, 07 5:19am
[+]
Lol, babs began throwing around accusations of racism on a ballot about school vouchers, where race was never mentioned or even implied.
No wonder she thinks this site is full of racists, she sees problems where none exist.
In fact, if it weren't such an obvious falsehood, I'd accuse her of being articulate and bright and clean, as she believes this to be the most insulting line in the english language.
I checked into this, and the last ballot that person posted was something like "I am baaaaack _SPlit" or something similar.
You know that because of this idiot, I made the user registration more bulletproof. I guess he has to do a lot more work in order to get his foot in the door. But no, he won't get far, doing what he is doing.
I know what type of psycho he really is, and I got THOUSANDS of abusive entries here and in my personal email spam box to prove it.
by LCD on Fri Feb 02, 07 11:36am
[+]
and the same goes to his "friends and associates" obviously.
by LCD on Fri Feb 02, 07 11:37am
[+]
Her(zog)loveliness, we know you are filthy, all RACISTS are...
Jappy, get a clue...You calling me a race baiter would be like my calling you emotionally sound...
BBC is clean and pure like MJ's little Angels are...
Way to avoid the question.
I asked about the NAACP because that is a racist organization, however, knowing you, and your rather ignorant viewpoints on race, Barbara, you likely believe that the NAACP is a marvelous organization that does amazing things for the black race.
And there in lays the issue, the NAACP is even by name only interested in helping one race, that is the very definition of racism. Organizations and celebratins and holidays and on and on, that focus on skin cover rather than true heritage are racism, plain and simple.
That's why I was interested in your viewpoints on the NAACP because it would certainly be interesting to know just where you stand, because approval of such an organization makes you no better than the accusations you are accusing others of :)
|
