=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

TRIAL OVER MOHAMMED CARTOONS BEGINS IN FRANCE?

user ballots

TRIAL OVER MOHAMMED CARTOONS BEGINS IN FRANCE?


[+] serious ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Sat Feb 10, 07

"PARIS, Feb. 7 — Hearings began Wednesday in a suit brought by two influential French Muslim organizations against a satirical weekly newspaper for printing cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad that had touched off international rioting.

The Paris Mosque and the Union of Islamic Organizations of France contend that the newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, and its director, Philippe Val, are guilty of slander, an offense that carries a possible six-month sentence and a fine of up to 22,500 euros, or about $29,000.

“If we can no longer laugh at the terrorists, what weapon is left for the citizen?” Mr. Val said at the hearing, according to The Associated Press.

“These drawings are about ideas, not men, about ideas defended by men who commit violent acts.”

The case is causing debate in a country where separation of church and state is considered a fundamental tenet of the national identity.

In its Feb. 8, 2006, issue, Charlie Hebdo republished 12 drawings that had originally appeared in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, some of them representing the Prophet Muhammad. The cartoons were first published in September 2005.

Two of those drawings are cited in the suit: one depicting the prophet greeting suicide bombers in heaven with the caption, “Stop, stop, we have run out of virgins,” and another depicting Muhammad wearing a turban containing a bomb. A third image included in the suit was an original drawing by the French cartoonist Cabu, depicting a crying Muhammad with his head in his hands, saying, “It’s hard to be loved by idiots.”

Outcry in the Muslim world over the Danish cartoons led to violent protests in a number of countries — which resulted in the deaths of at least 50 people — and boycotts of Danish products. A number of other European publications also reprinted the cartoons.

A lawyer for the newspaper on Wednesday read in court a letter of support from Nicolas Sarkozy, the interior minister and the leading conservative presidential candidate. Mr. Sarkozy, whose office said that he had written the letter as a presidential candidate and not as a cabinet minister, said he “preferred an excess of caricature to a lack of caricature.”

In response, representatives of the French Council for the Muslim Religion, a national group that Mr. Sarkozy’s office helped to create, called an emergency meeting.

Another presidential candidate, François Bayrou, and the Socialist Party leader, François Hollande, have been called by the defense to testify.

The issue of whether revisions to the 1901 law separating church and state might be needed has become a topic of discussion in the presidential campaign.

In recent decisions, French courts have largely ruled against religious groups that contended that their faiths had been insulted."

(Source: New York Times)


- So do you think those responsible for publishing those cartoons need to be punished by law for what they did?

Yes
No


Ballot #112160 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
87640. What is worse? Mildly offensive cartoons about a religious figure or cartoons mocking the genocide of 11 million people?
30438. What type of cartoons are the best? American cartoons or Japanese Anime?
87668. Why are anti-Islamic cartoons considered freedom of speech, while anti-Semetic cartoons are considered wrong?
112930. And So It Begins, Again!
114081. Is Tommy Thompson's presidential campaign over before it really begins?
110603. At which point does the River Thames stop and the coast begins?
113871. Pro-Israel lobby begins smear campaign against Nancy Pelosi
103457. We don't even know what Mohammed looked like, so how can one ban his image?
94990. If "life begins at conception," as so many fundies claim, why don't people say they're nine months older than they are?
125793. GREAT or GRIM; Mohammed Al Fayed


COMMENTS:
Voted : No
Oh, of course not. It's called freedom of the press. They should not be legally persecuted for what they published.
by xxxxxxxx on Sat Feb 10, 07 7:57am [+]

Voted : No
The enlightened concept of freedom of the press should not give way to the selfish bigotry of ultra-conservatives.
by cranky on Sat Feb 10, 07 8:10am [+]

Voted : No
^Typical liberal response cranky if it's not P.C nonsense it must be racist and should be censored.Freedom of Speech demands that all and any ideas be allowed to be published no matter how racist,hurtful,offensive or controversial.
by Corrupt on Sat Feb 10, 07 8:27am [+]

Voted : No
Free speech. We shouldn't do away with our freedoms to suit the backwards culture these muslims came from. I hope france doesn't take the PC route that I fear many in the US would follow, and declare any criticism of a protected minority to be hate speech and thus illegal.
by herzog on Sat Feb 10, 07 8:34am [+]

Voted : No
This is ridiculous: one cannot "slander" a religion or its dead founder--at least under Anglo-Saxon law, if not Gallic. ...And it is a freedom of speech matter, although it's hard to say how much of that remains under modern French or E.U. law, with all of its precious "sensitivity" towards avoiding the slightest offense to theocratic elements in the population.

I know Voltaire never foresaw this result when he wrote his "Treatise on Tolerance"...
by Felix on Sat Feb 10, 07 12:37pm [+]

Voted : No
- they should be given medlas for bravery!
by aplmac on Sat Feb 10, 07 12:43pm [+]

given medals, too!
by aplmac on Sat Feb 10, 07 12:44pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved