=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

AUSTRALIAN LEADER SAYS THAT TERRORISTS WANT OBAMA TO BECOME US PRESIDENT?

user ballots

AUSTRALIAN LEADER SAYS THAT TERRORISTS WANT OBAMA TO BECOME US PRESIDENT?


[+] serious ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Mon Feb 12, 07

"Rohan Sullivan, Canadian Press
Published: Monday, February 12, 2007
"SYDNEY, Australia - Australian Prime Minister John Howard on Monday denied having a political motive when he said terrorists in Iraq would be praying for Democratic hopeful Barak Obama to become U.S. president.

Howard, a steadfast supporter of U.S. President George W. Bush in the Iraq war, insisted his criticism of Obama's plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops in Iraq by March 31 next year was in Australia's national interest because Obama's plan would represent a defeat for Australia's most important military ally.

Howard's foray into U.S. politics dominated Monday's session of Parliament and news bulletins in Australia, and triggered a sharp response from Obama and senators on both sides of U.S. politics, including one who called the comments "bizarre."

The issue overshadowed the results of a new opinion poll published Monday showing Howard, who will attempt to lead his conservative coalition to a fifth term at elections expected later this year, is lagging badly behind Labour opposition leader Kevin Rudd.

In a nationally televised interview on Sunday, Howard said Obama's plan meant al-Qaida leaders in Iraq should "be praying as many times as possible for a victory, not only for Obama but also for the Democrats" at presidential elections due late next year.

Rudd said Howard's comments amounted to calling the Democrats "the terrorists' party of choice" and could harm Australia's future with a possible Democratic U.S. administration.

"I'm doing nothing of the kind. I don't retract anything I said," Howard told Parliament in Canberra, the national capital.

He said the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq early next year would be seen as a U.S. defeat that would "encourage and give succor" to terrorists in the Middle East and Asia and be "catastrophic for the West."

"I hold the strongest possible view that it is contrary to the security interests of this country for America to be defeated in Iraq," Howard said.

"Let me make it perfectly clear, if I hear a policy being advocated that is contrary to Australia's security interests, I will criticize it."

Obama, in Iowa a day after formally announcing his candidacy, responded to Howard's initial comments by saying he was flattered that one of Bush's close allies had chosen to single him out for attack.

He then challenged Howard on his commitment to the Iraq conflict, noting the United States has nearly 140,000 troops in Iraq compared to Australia's about 1,400 forces in the region.

"So if he is ginned up to fight the good fight in Iraq, I would suggest that he calls up another 20,000 Australians and sends them to Iraq," Obama said. "Otherwise it's just a bunch of empty rhetoric."

U.S. senators from both major parties criticized Howard.

"The most charitable thing you can say about Mr. Howard's comment is it is bizarre," Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon said on CNN's "Late Edition." "We'll make our own judgments in this country with respect to elections."

Texas Republican Jon Cornyn said Howard should have kept quiet.

"I would prefer that Mr. Howard stay out of our domestic politics, and we'll stay out of his domestic politics," he said.

In the latest ACNielsen poll published Monday in Fairfax newspapers, 48 per cent of respondents named Rudd as their preferred prime minister, compared to 43 per cent for Howard. Five per cent were undecided. The national telephone survey of 1,412 voters was conducted Feb. 8-10 - before Howard's comments on Obama - and had a margin of error of 2.6 percentage points.

Howard said in a radio interview that Australia's troop commitment "very significant and appropriate" given the country's relatively small population of about 20 million." "

(Source: Montreal Gazette)


- Do you agree with the Prime Minister of Australia that the terrorists in Iraq would most want to see Barack Obama as the next US President?


Yes, it is probably true
No, not at all
I don't care what the terrorist want
No, they'd rather have Bush for a third term


Ballot #112217 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
124155. Would you feel safe from terrorists if Obama was President?
123340. When Obama becomes USA President, what will he . . .
122502. Who will become the 45th President in 2017 when Obama is done?
124595. Obama for President Billboard... in Canada?
128421. Is the USA screwed regardless of whether Obama or McCain becomes President?
112937. Fox News President Jokes About Obama as Terrorist
121950. When Obama becomes the president, should we change the name "white house"?
126725. Has the Vice President question been aswered for Obama?
127260. How many press secretaries will Obama have when/if he is elected President?
102350. President Bush is a great man and leader.


COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes, it is probably true
Yes, likely. I believe a US withdrawl from Iraq is exactly in line with the goals and ambitions of the terrorists in Iraq.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Feb 12, 07 9:52am [+]

Voted : No, not at all
Maybe Howard will know better to shut the ƒu¢k up next time.
by _Beelzebubba on Mon Feb 12, 07 9:53am [+]

Voted : I don't care what the terrorist want
No nation should base their foreign policy on the desires of their enemies,we must base our decisions on what is in our best interest.So far it appears that it would be in our best interest to leave and thus we should do that.
by Corrupt on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:05am [+]

Voted : No, not at all
stupid comment for him to make.
by Kev24 on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:05am [+]

and i told you once socrates, learn to edit. do not make me have to tell you again. edddiittttt!
067
by Kev24 on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:06am [+]

Voted : No, they'd rather have Bush for a third term
After all, nobody is losing in Iraq as fast as Dubya could.
by cranky on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:28am [+]

No. Obama's policies would end up marginalizing terrorists' power by not setting them up as powerful bogeymen who are much stroinger than they really are.

What 'the terrorist' want is a continuation of hard-liners who can't see a big picture and can only think in terms of empire and military power -- because these are the kinds of leaders they can lure down the road to ruin.
by Guest User from [135.92.84.108] on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:29am [+]

Voted : Yes, it is probably true
Probably. Him or hillary, or any canidate that favors an immediate withdrawl rather than pulling out when the job is done.
by herzog on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:43am [+]

If you were fighting to take control of Iraq would you favor the US military staying, or leaving?
by herzog on Mon Feb 12, 07 10:43am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved