REPUBLICAN PROPOSAL WOULD PROHIBIT TRANSFER OF CRITICAL NATIONAL SECURITY

user ballots

REPUBLICAN PROPOSAL WOULD PROHIBIT TRANSFER OF CRITICAL NATIONAL SECURITY


[+] serious ballot by herzog
ACTIVE Tue Feb 13, 07 - Wed Feb 13, 08

Today, in H.R. 1, Democrats will bring legislation to the House floor supporting the transfer of responsibility for a critical national security program to the United Nations. House Republicans will offer a motion to block it.

The Democrat bill supports placing the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) under the purview of the United Nations. This 9/11 Commission report recognized the PSI as an effective program and suggested it be expanded – the Commission did not recommend placing PSI under the UN or any other multilateral regime, nor did it suggest it needed to authorized explicitly in international law.

The PSI is a critical national security initiative – organized by the United States and involving a number of countries – that uses diplomacy, intelligence, and other counterproliferation tools to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The PSI was a key deterrent to Libya’s nuclear weapons programs, and its dismantling was responsible for uncovering the nuclear “black market” run by Pakistani A.Q. Khan.

The Democrat proposal would force the United States to seek the permission of foreign governments before attempting to interdict illicit WMD material. And it would provide all members of the UN access to the strategies, routes, and participating countries in the PSI, undermining the effectiveness of the program.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

So essentially we'd give the very people we're trying to reign in (Iran, North Korea, China, et al) our plans for keeping them in line. Do you believe that it is a good idea to put such a security measure in the hands of the UN with their terrible track record and questionable membership?

Yes it is a good idea
No, the UN should not be included


Ballot #112267 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
102321. Security responsibility transfer of Dhi Qar Province. Another good sign?
100237. Proposal to take National Guard away from the states. Good or bad?
94329. Is the US border controversy really about National Security?
111602. Should Congress demand the President consult with it on national security?
117577. National Security: Who's the Eight Hundred Pound Gorilla In The Room ?
89841. Did the Republicans in Congress shoot down the ports deal purely out of national security or to get re-elected?
89979. What would you do if you were driving past the Republican National Headquarters and it was on fire?
82276. US Senate votes 90 - 9 to prohibit ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading’ treatment of of terrorism suspects. Do you agree?
70623. Can you be patriotic without being critical of authority?
72420. Critical shortage of software developers in the US?


COMMENTS:
Voted : No, the UN should not be included
Seems pretty obvious to me.

Now, the site I quoted has 'republican' in the title, but I checked the facts independently and they seem to hold up. I advise you to do the same before simply saying I'm a liar nd ignoring the topic.
by herzog on Tue Feb 13, 07 7:57pm [+]

Voted : No, the UN should not be included
Madness. Let's see left-wingers justfy this
by funtastic on Wed Feb 14, 07 7:02am [+]

TNG: no, they didn't. There are a few stalkers on here, not to mention any names (cranky), that follow me from ballot to ballot and furiously vote for whatever option they think I don't want them to vote for. It's kind of pathetic. Especially since I rarely even look at the results (for this reason) and only focus on the responses.
by herzog on Wed Feb 14, 07 10:47am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved