WHAT SAY YOU ALL WHEN A B&W USER INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENT THE FACTS?

user ballots

private :

WHAT SAY YOU ALL WHEN A B&W USER INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENT THE FACTS?


[+] ballot by Barbara_Baby_Cakes
created Fri Mar 02, 07

This ballot is in response to Kev24 ballot (112711)

He accuses Cranky and myself for being responsible for the Herzog situation and he continues to move about the site making racial disparaging remarks regarding Blacks. However, if anyone dare makes a comments regarding GAYS, he has a HUSSY (thats correct, a HUSSY fit) fit.

To get the facts of the case, please refer to LCD's ballot (112697) and I am certain his ballot will clear this matter up.

Also, for the record, I did speak in Herzog's behalf and everyone here is well aware that he and I don't see eye to eye on the matter of race. However, I did go on record and asked that his superuser status and other benefits of being apart of this site are reinstated.

I created this ballot because Kev24 has made childish allegations and locked me out of his ballot preventing me from setting the record straight...

Now, what say you all, what is your opinion about a B&W user who intentionally misrepresents the facts regarding this matter and matters like it?

That person should get a life...
That person believed what he represented was an accurate account...
Here are my thoughts...
I abstain from chosing sides


Ballot #112712 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
8947. Would you ever intentionally avoid someone you are in love with?
101693. Is the UN intentionally aiding hezbollah?
113330. Is Iran intentionally baiting the U.K. into a war?
98925. Does Hezbollah intentionally hide behind civillians?
100245. Does Israel intentionally target civillians?
100248. Does Hezbollah intentionally target civillians?
128654. Is the price of oil being intentionally driven upwards?
105589. If someone intentionally sets himself up as a human shield for a terrorist
96110. Woman who intentionally infected numerous men with HIV, sentenced to 2.5 years
100642. Should intentionally hitting civilian targets be considered a war crime?


COMMENTS:
Voted : I abstain from chosing sides
This is a legitimate option that should be included on both ballots, however the addition of this choice is not made possible on the other ballot.
Please understand some may wish not to have to choose between two people we consider to be friends.
by passiveson on Fri Mar 02, 07 9:52pm [+]

I'm not asking anyone here to chose a side, I am merely stating the facts that are in evidence. Kev24 misrepresented the facts and the truth can be found in LCD's ballot.

When a user spews lies against another user and locks that user from their ballot preventing them from having their say, then that is not in keeping with the facts and fair play...

In other words, I am having my saying regarding the matter and offering the facts 025
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 10:00pm [+]

I personally never block comments on my ballots.
by skylab on Fri Mar 02, 07 10:04pm [+]

And it would be unfair to judge all gays by one person.
by skylab on Fri Mar 02, 07 10:06pm [+]

I'm not judging him because he is gay, in fact, I am not judging him at all. I am merely refuting his misrepresentation of the facts in the Herzog matter.

He has moved around this site making discussing comments about Black people and as soon as someone types the word, "GAY," he loses it...He can not have it both ways, whether he prefers having that way or not...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 10:15pm [+]

Correction: "...Making *disgusting* comments about Black people..."
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 10:17pm [+]

Personally, I would say shut the f*ck up and get over it.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:01pm [+]

I would say why don't you do the same Nate, huh, you do the same. The manner in how you responded to this ballot was unnecessary...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:17pm [+]

I disagree entirely sweetheart.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:23pm [+]

I'm not your sweetheart, your response is still inappropriate, this is a serious ballot and you come along to prove what point exactly?
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:25pm [+]

If you think the little ballot jockeying game you and a few other folks are playing is either entertaining or does indeed serve a purpose, then by all means continue. Wtf does a big grown man like you care what I think.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:30pm [+]

I don't care what you think, you came along on my ballot buddy and make a inappropriate statement. Your response had nothing to do with the issue that I addressed.

You may charaterize this ballot as you see fit. However, if you didn't have anything positive to contribute to this ballot, why say anything at all?

I'am not here playing games, why are you here on this ballot continuing to address it beyond its scope?
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:35pm [+]

Because it pleases me to knot your panties.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:36pm [+]

Get a life Nate, you couldn't knot a tie...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:38pm [+]

Loop swoop and pull.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:38pm [+]

You saying it doesn't mean you can mechanically perform that magic trick...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:40pm [+]

Are you hitting on me?
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:40pm [+]

Not even in your sickiest dreams Nate, now, go sleep it off...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:41pm [+]

Fine. Hey maybe tomorrow we can make ballots together about people who tell lies. Like a bonding thing. I dunno. We'll see where the wind takes us I guess.
by ThisIsNate on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:43pm [+]

Hey, sounds like a winner to me, well, enjoy Nate, until next time 025
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Fri Mar 02, 07 11:44pm [+]

Herzog and I have clashed on several occasions, and although I oppose him on many issues, we do tend to debate civilly.

His anti-Islamic and immigration stances can tend to be close to the line, but how does one persuade if one is not allowed to debate the issue?

Despite our polar views I would like to believe there is grudging respect for the other persons argument, even if we vehenently oppose it.

Incidently, ballot blocking is just admitting that you have lost the argument in my view, and if youre worried about getting bad karma, then any argument put up that you cannot stand behind despite the vitriol, is a pretty weak one.

I would happily be downrated by anyone who believes that my point is offensive and/or racist, and I would desreve it, any bad karma for spurious reasons i.e. disagreeing, is indicative of the opposition being unable to fight their corner.
by Steelhamster on Sat Mar 03, 07 6:19am [+]

BBC, you must be mistaken. Kev HAS NEVER made any disparaging remarks about Blacks or any other race.
by aya on Sat Mar 03, 07 10:46am [+]

BBC, you blocked Kev, so how can he defend himself on your ballot?
by aya on Sat Mar 03, 07 10:49am [+]

Voted : Here are my thoughts...
Kev has made comments for/as example... several on this site use it as a tool... and commonly disparage users with phobic remarks as if it's common place and acceptable... and then, for instance, label herzog as a bigot! I've not read any comments from herzog that would make me consider him racist.
by MO_ on Sat Mar 03, 07 11:27am [+]

I won't get involved in this ballot other than to say I noticed that in your own way you spoke in herzog's behalf. I appreciate your belief in free speech.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Sat Mar 03, 07 3:42pm [+]

Voted : That person should get a life...
Yes he has Aya, he most certainly has...Your choice to ignore them...I blocked him aya because he blocked me from his lil ballot of lies...

I do not seek anyone here to side with me, I merely wanted to give my side of this matter...

I thank those who participated and if you want to read some of his disgusting racial rants aimed at my wife aya, go to his ballot of lies, his comments were uncall for and my wife has never made any disparaging remarks regarding his sexuality, however, he found it necessary to attack her, what a pantwaste he is and will always be...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Mon Mar 05, 07 7:55pm [+]

Correction: *pantywaste*
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Mon Mar 05, 07 7:57pm [+]

I posted on the other ballot like this one. I have the same words to give here. I don't know what influence, if any, you had in Herzog's problems. You say he has prevented you from defending yourself on the ballot in question. How? I checked and he does not have you blocked. You have him blocked from defending himself on this ballot.

by Beauregard on Sat Mar 10, 07 6:41am [+]

Voted : I abstain from chosing sides
Sorry, I meant to vote.
by Beauregard on Sat Mar 10, 07 6:41am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved