search this site: search the web:
Vote on the Best, vote on the Worst, vote until your mouse finger hurts!

TRAVELLING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN YOUR CAR...

user ballots

TRAVELLING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN YOUR CAR...


[+] serious ballot by winston
created Sat Mar 03, 07

You are in your car travelling along at the speed of light, when you decide to turn on your headlights. What happens?

I Know...
I haven't got a fucking clue...

Ballot #112717 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
62945. Is the speed of light really constant?
11346. To what speed should I petition my state to increase the speed limit?
125819. When you approach those speed limit signs that show your speed
104927. Jesus very likely could have had light hair and light eyes.
27534. Do you enjoy travelling?
127570. Would you be a travelling companion of Dr Who?
77615. Travelling enriched my life
66185. How long would it take you to drive to the moon, travelling at 100 km/h?
122789. travelling in the backwoods of eastern europe via motorcycle
95451. do you speed?


COMMENTS:
Voted : I Know...
The photon emmitions can't exceed the speed of light, so they travel at the same rate, in a parallel plane of space as the vehicle.
by passiveson on Sat Mar 03, 07 6:05am [+]

This is a more precise ansewer :

Your question contradicts Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity which states that no object with mass CAN travel at, or above, the speed of light (c). As your car approaches c, its resistance to acceleration (mass) increases so that it would take an impossibly infinite force to actually reach c. Your question, then, is based on an impossible premise. It's like asking 'What would happen if I reached the North Pole and kept going north?'

Imagine that you are in your car 'traveling at the speed of light' and that you turn on your headlights. That state of motion is utterly equivalent to being at rest in an empty universe. Since, when at rest, the light from your headlights would be launched forward from your car at the speed of light, relative to you, with a certain color spectrum, that is exactly what would happen if somehow you could be moving instead at the speed of light.

In other words, the presence or absence of other objects or matter in the universe relative to which, if present, you could make a determination that you were moving at the speed of light makes absolutely no difference to your own experiences and experiments. The light that you launch behaves in exactly the same way whether the other referential matter exists or not.

This leads into another interesting question, however. And that is whether the rest of the matter (mass) in the universe in some way affects your own local observations. So far this question has come up in relation to theories of gravity. If effect, the question is how does the universal gravitational constant, G, which determines how strongly gravitating masses attract each other, know what value to assume if there is no other mass in the universe. Mach proposed, essentially on philosophical grounds, that G must be determined by the sum total of all of the mass in the universe. Einstein assumed in his General Theory of Relativity that G is simply a universal constant, independent of the specific mass distribution of the universe. On the other hand, Brans and Dicke later proposed a so-called scalar-tensor theory of gravity in which the local value of G depends upon the rest of the mass in the universe through an additional scalar field that does not appear in Einstein's theory.
by passiveson on Sat Mar 03, 07 6:22am [+]

Voted : I Know...
^What passiveson said
by skylab on Sat Mar 03, 07 10:27am [+]

Voted : I Know...
At the speed of light you would be starting to out run time there fore distance is no longer a problem. So the light out of your headlights stay in the bulb.
by polikeyll on Sat Mar 24, 07 3:04pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved