WOULD MILITARY ACTION PREVENT IRAN FROM DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS?

=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

WOULD MILITARY ACTION PREVENT IRAN FROM DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

WOULD MILITARY ACTION PREVENT IRAN FROM DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS?

[+] serious ballot by winston
created Sun Mar 04, 07
Military strikes against Iran could speed Tehran's development of nuclear weapons, according to a UK think tank. A report by the Oxford Research Group says military action could lead Iran to change the nature of its programme and quickly build a few nuclear arms. (Source BBC)

Do you believe military action would stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Yes - Military action would stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
No -Military action would not stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
Not sure

Ballot #112781 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
101159. Will U.N. sanctions against Iran stop it from developing nuclear weapons?
101162. Is not stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons a form of appeasement?
103203. Why are poverty stricken countries developing Nuclear weapons?
96315. If Iran did get nuclear weapons, would they give such weapons to terrorists?
111807. is it really such a bad thing if iran has nuclear weapons?
89344. Is it hypocritical for Bush to try and prevent Iran from gaining nuclear technology, while at the same time selling it to India?
84107. If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, how is that a threat to the U.S.?
64904. Would you support the invasion of Iran if nuclear weapons are being developed?
87513. What should happen if Pakistan gives Iran nuclear weapons technology?
59763. Why is the western world in an uproar over Iran obtaining nuclear weapons when Israel (70 UN resolutions against it) has a stockade of nukes?

COMMENTS:
Voted : No -Military action would not stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
I think a military strike on Iran by the USA, or anyone else, would be disastrous

by winston on Mon Mar 05, 07 12:02am [+]

Voted : No -Military action would not stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
Though it's effective if the key targets are located and disabled. It doesn't stop them but it can slow them up. That is "IF" the key targets are located.

by passiveson on Mon Mar 05, 07 3:53am [+]

Voted : No -Military action would not stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
With Cheney/Bush in charge it would probably be a total screw-up. They wouldn't get the job done. Iran would work even more furiously on getting nukes, and they would have an obvious argument for getting nukes: to defend themselves from attacks by the U.S.

If attacks were undertaken by a competent government, it might work.

by cranky on Mon Mar 05, 07 7:30am [+]

Voted : Yes - Military action would stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
Properly done; sure. More likely to produce results than appeasement negotiations a la Hitler and Chamberlain. Iran has no intention of stopping. For them agreeing to negotiations is just a way to stall the rest of the world until they complete building one.

Think tanks are worthless is most cases and especially when dealing with a bunch or religious madmen.

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Mar 05, 07 7:49am [+]

Voted : Yes - Military action would stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons
Although I'd change it from "would" to "could." Yes, I think it's possible that military action could stop Iran from developing weapons, if done properly. That said, I don't think a military strike is anywhere near the best idea if there are other options.

by himself809 on Mon Mar 05, 07 3:15pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact