=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

ARE YOU OPPOSED TO A "MIXED" EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION IN THE WHITE HOUSE?

user ballots

ARE YOU OPPOSED TO A "MIXED" EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION IN THE WHITE HOUSE?


[+] serious ballot by passiveson
ACTIVE Wed Mar 07, 07 - Fri Mar 06, 09

Every four years, America decides to change the administration in the White House. Sometimes the current administration is chosen for a second term, and sometimes the administration alternates between parties.
This Puritan party occupation of the White House (whether it's democratic or republican) can wreak havoc on America's political and economic stability.

So instead of electing a Republican (or Democrat) President and Vice President, wouldn't it be better if the winner must endorse the loser as his Vice President?

This way, no matter which party wins an election, both Party's get represented in the Oval Office. Would You Be Opposed to A "Mixed" Executive Administration Representing You In The White House?

Good Idea
Won't Ever Work
Comment


Ballot #112855 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
127390. Greetings from the White House
72598. Who is really in charge at the White House?
113104. Republicans...Who would you rather see in the White House?
3245. why does it have to be the ***WHITE HOUSE ***???? why cant it be the "BLACK HOUSE"?????????
104636. Once the Democrats take over the White House in '08, how long will it take
111107. Who Was Your Favorite First Lady of the White House?
112814. Does a terrorist care who’s in the White House?
116879. Are we ready for a Mormon in the White House?
123202. Who was the only president to be married in the White House?
126644. Who Is The White House Drug Czar ?


COMMENTS:
Voted : Good Idea
See, Check 'em out. I think it's working.

by passiveson on Wed Mar 07, 07 5:03pm [+]

Voted : Won't Ever Work
LMNAO for the pic!

The "mixed Executive" idea would go over as well as Kev at Fred Phelphs' church.
by Truthseeker013 on Wed Mar 07, 07 5:34pm [+]

Voted : Won't Ever Work
They will never abandon the two party system. It's this good cop/bad cop scenario that pretty much guarantees that we will get screwed no matter who we vote for.
by _Beelzebubba on Thu Mar 08, 07 9:20am [+]

Voted : Comment
If two people are running for President, it's hard to imagine the loser willing to be subordinate to the winner. On the other hand, what if Presidential and Vice Presidential elections were separated in that one could theoretically vote for, say, a Democratic President and a Republican Vice President?
I like the idea of breaking up partisanship.

Additionally, the United States government has retained the same structure (executive, legislative, judicial) for the last 230 years. Back then the population was about 3 million; (closer to 4 million including slaves). Today, the population is about 300 million, and the U.S. is at present the preeminent world power.
I firmly believe that the office of President of the United States endows the individual holding it more power than should be given to any one person (or 2 people including the Veep), which is precisely what we sought to avoid when we mapped out the structure of our Government. If I had my druthers we'd reassess the balance of power and degree of representation the system provides.
I think a lot of people feel the President has too much power, but ironically it seems an impossible feat to work towards diffusing or diminishing that power to a more reasonable degree in the face of centralized government. Diffusing the power could take the form of something like a 3 or 5-member executive branch. Diminishing it could mean better checks.
by Applerod on Fri Mar 09, 07 2:22am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved