user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
The jury is still out on this one. I think more people now think it was, as you call, a set-up maneuver. But I also think people thought that right away. Maybe they were just shouted down?
Tower 7 was purposely demolished by city workers after it was weakened by the collapse of the main towers as a public safety measure. That is a fact and it's weird that no media have picked up on this.
According to several local eyewitness accounts, tower seven was demoed by a crew of NYC workers after it was discovered to have severe structural damage from the twin tower collapse.
Thank you and good night...try the veal, and don't forget to tip your waitress...
Voted : What the hell are you talking about?
I must have missed this news story of the century somehow. I guess the majority of the world did too (along with their news networks).
In my mind there's no question that the administration was predisposed towards invading Iraq and setting up another "democratic ally" there to strengthen American influence.
That's been a spectacular failure. Yes, they used the fear wrought by 9/11 to push forward their agenda.
However, unless some new, irrefutable, ironclad evidence surfaces (like video/audio of the administration planning the attack), whatever could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law has already been examined and reexamined thousands of times over by experts qualified to do so, or those who actually witnessed the attacks. Millions of other people have also "examined" the "evidence" and have discovered nothing solid enough to refute the commonly accepted series of events beyond a reasonable doubt. If they had, about a thousand news sources would have jumped on it immediately.
Voted : What the hell are you talking about?
Where did you get your info ??? While I will always have a problem with the way those buildings came down in their own "foot print", I must have missed whatever news service you got this "bulletin" from...
Ever seen the Charlie Sheen poll by CNN? Most people already know that 9/11 was an inside job committed by a criminal faction within the government of the USA.
Well, let's see, where do I begin, I'll start with Tower 7:
A) No plane ever hit it
B)It collapsed around 4-430ish, and I'm sure that was already a good few hours after the first two "collapsed".
C)It fell perfectly on the spot it was built, coming down as if almost to say it was rigged for implosion ahead of time, because well, for a building that size to collapse that perfectly would've had to have been pre-ordinated and planned.
And for those who seen the news report where the CIA was trying to convince the administration that an attack from "foreign extremists" was imminent, how come they didn't bother paying any real attention to the threat at hand?
If your any person with the ability to think, you can already see that this whole 9/11 tragedy was a "setup maneuver" for control over people, or not so much control but support into what they were really planning to do.
You were all tricked, manipulated, played false, sheistered, flamboozled, told to look in one direction so they could go another, rope-a-doped, and so on and so forth.
Any other evidence you need is found in FBI briefings released on the net, and 9/11 conspiracy websites. And if you think for a second the conspiracy sites are too farfetched to have actually happened, then I ask you, What made you believe in your governments story?
Structurally speaking though, those two towers never, NEVER, could've collapsed from any airplane impact or weakened by any jet fuel burning, because jet fuel doesn't create intense heat like they said it does. Those two towers would still be standing getting repaired. But they were symbols as was the act of destroying them, and obviously we can see how people would take that seriously.
Why do people always have to jump to the first conclusion given to them because someone of authority says so?
Why can't people ever ask why instead of jumping to the blame game?
And why would you all sit on your asses hoping for resolution and redemption to come to you on the news stations?
Don't believe your governments, don't believe anyone that makes six figure salaries plus million dollar bonuses. Believe in your own intelligence(for those that have any)and wait for the investigators to make their report to compare notes. And if your lucky, you can collect evidence before the government censors the documents.
^How come 6 years later you guys can't give it a rest?
Voted : Fear, a government key tool got the best of you.
Because six years later, there are crooks still trying to stop any real investigation. 9/11 was an inside job, and the world knows it.
^The world's media has yet to report it. I guess they are in on it too.
It's been reported in plenty of places. You just aren't paying attention.
For example, you can read Asia Times Online, the Sydney Morniung Herald, Pravda, just to name a few.
Largest Swiss Paper Asks
If Bush Was Behind 911
By Elie Peter
9-18-6
ZURICH -- 2,973 humans died with the attacks of 9/11. "Bin Laden" and
"Al Qaeda", the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version.
Now, Swiss university professors Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) raise hot new questions.
"Something is not correct", says strategy expert Stahel in "World Week", and refers to the "incomplete" official US Government 9/11 Report of 2004.
The university professor confirms his criticism in VIEW:
"Osama Bin Laden cannot be 'the large godfather' behind the attacks. He did not have enough means of communication".
Stahel doubts that a passenger airliner crashed into the Pentagon:
"For trainee pilots it is actually impossible to crash into the building so exactly. Seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, the World trade center Building 7 next to it also collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Nothing at all is clear."
Raising questions along with Stahel is historian Dr. Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich.
Dr. Daniele Ganser
Dr. Ganser also calls the official US version "a conspiracy theory".
"There are 3 theories, which we should treat equally":
1. "Surprise theory" - Bin Laden and Al Qaeda implemented the attacks.
2. "Let it happen on purpose" - The US Government knew the Al Qaeda plans and did not react in order to legitimize a series of wars.
3. "Made it happen on purpose" - The attacks were actually planned and orchestrated by the Pentagon and/or US secret services.
Ganser: "3,000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests. The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version. It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. Bush has lied so much already! And we already know that the US government planned an operation in 1962 (Operation Northwoods) that was approved by the Pentagon that would have sacrificed innocent US citizens for the government's own interests."
As far as Ganser and Stahel go: "We only ask questions."
Can't forget the people who publicly question the USA govt's 9/11 lies. There are lots of them.
Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret)– Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech).
He said "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.…
Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.
I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder."
Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret)– Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career.
In an essay, he wrote; "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
There's thousands more, and nearly every poll shows either a substantial disbelief of the USA govt's 9/11 story, or outright majority of people disbelieving the whole story as lies and coverup.
I think pretty much sums it up is what Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) said about it. She's a former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.
What she said about it is this; "It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics."
(Tower 7 was purposely demolished by city workers after it was weakened by the collapse of the main towers as a public safety measure. That is a fact and it's weird that no media have picked up on this.
by Guest User on Sat Mar 10, 07 12:11pm)
They have tried to avoid doing so, because it raises a critical problem, that the explosives for that demolition were already in place. Therefore, why not the same for north and south towers? They collapsed the same way as any other controlled demolitions, and looked like many typical demolitions. Most of us recognised them, and so did the media journalists, many of them describing how all three collapses looked exactly like controlled demolitions.
Could you post a link to Asia time reporting 9/11 was a coverup or any other main stream media outlet for that matter (and no, "Largest Swiss Paper" doesn't cut it, I want names and links)
If you look at the evidence now, you'll plainly see that the Saudi royal family, The Bush family and all their friends in administration, the defense departments, the Afghani's(related to Saudi's), and oil companies, and investors for all the companies involved in this whole 9/11/Iraq mess, are the ones responsible for 9/11.
Because A) they made billions of dollars off a lie
B) it was very well orchestrated to make the only people that they need to believe the lie(Americans) for the support to do anything, not just go to Iraq, but anything. If they blamed the Prime Minister of England and gave out phony evidence and documents to the people, you would have believed it. You'd believe anything your superiors say when your country has just been attacked.
Still, even now some of you idiot Americans have to ask yourself:
Will they ever catch Osama Bin Laden?! The man that assembled and planned the immediate hijackings that would inevitably make everyone he's related to rich as hell! He is related to the Saudi's very much so too. Like how 15 of 19 hijackers were Saudi.
I think it's funny how you all listened to your leader change his mind on who was to blame. He went from Osama to Saddam and everyone in America was there to help post the blame.
I'm done, you people are really stupid and this topic just pisses me off thinking about it.
Grow some backbones and brains already! Stop putting question-free support and undying complacency with your evil and manipulative masters! It makes me sick! It's like watching a wife beater smack his wife, blame it on the alcohol, apologize to her so she can go to the vendor for him to pick up more alcohol and keep fueling the problem.
^Sounds like you've got it all figured out. Maybe let the New York Times in on your little discovery.
Did the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Fox, NBC, or whatever tell the truth about WMDs not being in Iraq and call the Bush Administration a pack of liars? No?
Gee, they didn't show much honesty then did they, so why would they now???
No wonder the majority of people don't trust them!
?Are you the same "guest user" that was going to list quotes from major news organisations talking about the 9/11 cover-up?
|
|
