DEMOCRATS SOFT OF DEFENSE?

user ballots

DEMOCRATS SOFT OF DEFENSE?


[+] ballot by Noblese_Oblige
ACTIVE Sat Mar 24, 07 - Thu Dec 17, 09

With yesterday's vote to cut off funding and require the troops to come off their valuable mission...

the Republicans will certainly make the case that dems are soft on defense


Do you agree or disagree that dems are soft on defense?

Agree
Disagree

Ballot #113349 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
35540. why are so many prosecutors republicans and defense attorneys democrats?
87613. Is it really true that every bad boy still has a soft side?
110903. The Best Soft Rock Compliation
115342. What soft drink do you prefer.
118376. Who - apart from your Significant Other - do you have a HUGE soft spot for?
69256. What is the worst tasting soft drink out on the market?
91421. Killing in self-defense: OKAY or NOT OKAY?
54609. Should it be legal to kill in self Defense.
110979. Is hate a necessary defense mechanism?
98931. Do you think american soldiers would recieve any defense on here . . .


COMMENTS:
Voted : Disagree
That is the position of Bush, many Republicans and his supporters...They have been sending Americans to their deaths based on a LIE for over 4 years.

Bush is always singing those same lame songs, "Ooooh, Weeee will staaaaay the Courrrrssssse, Oooooh, Weeeee will continuuuuue the fight againt Terrrrrorissssmmmm, Ooooooh, Weeeee will make surrrrre that the Iraqi peeeeople get their freeeeeeedooooommmm, etc, etc, etc..."

The Democrats aren't the only ones fighting to get the Troops home, check out the latest polls...The Republicans and the supporters of Bush aren't the ones doing the dying, coming home with ugly physical mutilations and many are/will become psychological damaged, many of these soldiers will NEVER be the same.

So, the H*ll with peoples' notion that the Democrats are soft on defense, say what you think, feel and will, Bush was a lying piece of sh*t when he claimed that Saddam had weapons of mass destructions... And rather than admitting he was wrong and that the Americans can NOT and will NOT win in Iraq and Iran, he continues to stand by and watch Americans continue to die...011 Sheesssh, unbelieveable...
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Sat Mar 24, 07 11:46am [+]

Voted : Disagree
the democrats are giving more money than Bush asked - but instead of giving it directly to Halliburton, they want to spend it on medical help for the troops, Afghanistan, body armor, stuff like that. Don't think they're weak at all -
by Guest User from [206.191.1.179] on Sat Mar 24, 07 12:16pm [+]

Voted : Disagree
Soft on defense implies that an open ended war in Iraq is in America's best interests, which I don't agree with. Iraqis will need to defend themselves at some point.
by skylab on Sat Mar 24, 07 1:14pm [+]

I do support our troops, I just think the war is misguided.
by skylab on Sat Mar 24, 07 1:16pm [+]

I support the Troops, I served over 8 years myself, those of you who are hardcore Bush lapdog supporters who believe that the Troops should remain in Iraq, why don't you all suit up and go to Iraq yourselves and die for your lying, arrogant, apparently drugged up, ignorant, mad cowboy disease sufferer and pathetic President?

Just a lingering question I have, I would love to read your excuses why you would not serve as I have already done so 025
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Sat Mar 24, 07 1:33pm [+]

Disagree, they're very tough they just happen to be fighting for the enemy.
by lowerclassbrats on Sat Mar 24, 07 2:10pm [+]

Voted : Disagree
I don't think a conservative element can support a case with respect to bringing troops home from a war of irresponsibility. Claiming the democrats don't want to support the troops or give a damn about our brave men and women in uniform is nothing but an unsubstantiatable dissent into ignorance.

The fact that troops were sent to Iraq or Afghanistan in the first place is an injudicous malfeasance more qualifying of the accusation of apathy for the lives of American Service men and women. Is there one reasonable justifacation that can be presented supporting an argument of necessity to defense since the pretense for the war was fallacious in the first place.
The loss of American lives there is inexcusable is the rational party's policy in supporting and caring about our troops.
Those guilty of not supporting or caring about our service men and women are identified by their willingness to risk our soldier's lives in combat absent necessity of defense, but are to cowardly to place themselves in harms alongside the soldier.

Would the democrats have waged this war in opposition of the better judgement of the international community, or absent NATO support? Since our withdrawal from Vietnam, can precedence be cited favoring the sacrafice of American soldiers when our Nation's Security isn't an issue?
Was Iraq's imposing posture satisfactory to meet sufficient criteria of a clear and eniment threat to justify the insurgence?

Noblese_Oblige and NewGirl, Cite your logic why our soldiers should be in Iraq and Afghanistan? Put up or shut up!
by passiveson on Sun Mar 25, 07 5:40am [+]

TheNewGirl, You started here on January 28 this year, but Ken_from_dublin hasn't been here since December 13 last year.
Why do you have Ken_fom_dublin on your favorite users list since you couldn't possibly know him?

I notice pretty much no one on this site has you as a favorite. Isn't that a clue to you about the quality of your character and opinions?102
by passiveson on Sun Mar 25, 07 5:54am [+]

Voted : Disagree
The mission IS NOT VALUABLE! It has been a waste of lives and money from the very beginning.

The only people who have profited from it are the War Profiteers like Haliburton and Bush and his oil corporate cronies.

This unwinable mission has been paid for with the blood of many fine young Americans and innocent Iraqi's.

The Democrats are not soft on Defense!

Defense of WHAT? An unwinnable war in a shithole country started by a bunch of crooks for the benefit of war profiteers and the oil companies.

By continuing the war WE are paying for their MISTAKE!

The Democrats and trying to put an end to this FIASCO!

Let COMMON SENSE RULE!



by Grapost on Sun Mar 25, 07 6:30am [+]

Isn't it a little unusual to put someone who hasn't been here since your arrival and whom you're unfamiliar with as a favotite user?

It seems congruent with logic that a person who respects your opinions might opt to list you as a favorite because of good character. Isn't that why you list them on your's? I could be wrong, it's just my observation and opinion.

Criticism is unintentional here, but I'd like to hear how you qualify the credibility of the accusation that democrats don't care about the troops when they clearly want to take them out of harms way? Would you mind elaborating on that?

Do I have access to your private messages or privledge to add/delete to your favorites? It would certainly elevate my status here and I'm pretty sure LCD would take exception to that.

I hope you don't take this as an insult because it's not my intention to offend you, but from my observations you could probably benefit from some psycho-pharmacological therapy. You're perhaps Paranoid, Bi polar and suffer Dissociative Identity disorder.
by passiveson on Sun Mar 25, 07 10:08am [+]

^ Bada Bing! I almost wet my "Goodnights Irenes!" Excellent psycho summarization and I must also say, you will not receive a direct response to her outlandish accusation that Democrats and I quote:

"I think they (democrats) just don't want to support the troops. As in, not giving a damn about our brave men and women in uniform. Spend those funds on the illegal aliens' education, healthcare and incarceration." - TNG, aka, Black_Lava

You see Passiveson, she knows Kev_from_Dublin under her B_Lava username and who knows, her many other usernames...Well, my work is done 025


by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Sun Mar 25, 07 11:49am [+]

BBC, certainly she isn't going to evade giving a judicious account for this unprecedented obstinance?
Why should she do that? After all, she must have based her preposition on some substantive evidence.

Any reasonably intellegent person is capable of articulating a comprehensive explaination to support a stated opinion or clarify an answer to a simple question.

Otherwise, it would be derelict in stating something outrageous ignorant absent verity. Maybe you're being to harsh. Perhaps if we're patient, she might prove her valor before her peers.

Not doing so would equate to the quality and character of a coward.
by passiveson on Sun Mar 25, 07 1:08pm [+]

The question is really subjective because we haven't defined "soft" and "defense"...
by Applerod on Sun Mar 25, 07 3:53pm [+]

Aw, so sad. TheNewGirl is on Hiatus. She left this for me on her user page.

TheNewGirl

My Motto is "I am gone."

passiveson, you win. Your obvious love comments aimed at LCD did me in.


Gee, I wonder if I talk in my sleep? I don't recall making any "Love Comments" to LCD. 054
I wonder if TheNewGirl was a mind reader? Oh, my shame.....
by passiveson on Sun Mar 25, 07 10:26pm [+]

Voted : Disagree
Trust me passiveson, she is done 025
by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Mon Mar 26, 07 11:26am [+]

Voted : Disagree
Ha ha
by passiveson on Mon Mar 26, 07 1:29pm [+]

The IP address at 72.249.32.247 has been reported for abuse at abuse@colo4dallas.com, your internet provider.
by passiveson on Mon Mar 26, 07 8:11pm [+]

Truly..? - The biggest defense mistakes were made by Repubs at the start of the war. We'll see an even bigger mess before our war ends, and blame shifted every which way
by Jyl on Tue Mar 27, 07 7:20am [+]

passiveson, you win. Your obvious love comments aimed at LCD did me in.

Whatever do you mean? This, "Do I have access to your private messages or privledge to add/delete to your favorites? It would certainly elevate my status here and I'm pretty sure LCD would take exception to that"?

In case that comment is confusing you, It Means That LCD Would Not Like It!

You seem to think I have some favor on this site, but you're incorrect. Just because I know how to find broken links and I'm familar with the site, doesn't mean I'm privledged. It means I'm resourceful.

Good Luck Girl!
by passiveson on Wed Apr 04, 07 1:14pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved