search this site: search the web:
Look, there's no advertisement anywhere! isn't that nice?

IS A RUSSIA TO THE U.S. TUNNEL UNDER THE BERING STRAIT A GOOD IDEA?

user ballots

IS A RUSSIA TO THE U.S. TUNNEL UNDER THE BERING STRAIT A GOOD IDEA?


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Mon Apr 23, 07 - Sat Jan 16, 10

CALGARY - Russia yesterday revived a plan to transport oil, natural gas and electricity to the United States via a tunnel under the Bering Strait from Siberia to Alaska, a colossal project that was quickly panned for its questionable economics and business logic and its impact on U.S. energy security.

Yesterday morning in Moscow, Viktor Razbegin, deputy head of industrial research at the Russian Economy Ministry, told reporters that state organizations in partnership with private companies would build and manage the energy corridor, known as TKM-World Link.

The 6,000-kilometre corridor from Siberia into the United States includes a 100-kilometre tunnel under the Bering Strait. It will be more than twice as long as the underwater section of the Channel Tunnel between the U.K. and France. The undersea tunnel would contain a highspeed railway, highway and pipelines, as well as power and fiberoptic cables.

According to a Bloomberg News report, proponents will meet with Canadian and U.S. government officials for a formal presentation next week.

Considering the project's questionable business sense, some critics wondered if Russia has ulterior motives in proposing such a grandiose plan.

In Europe, there is heightened anxiety over its dependence on Russian natural gas, which many fear could be used to further the Kremlin's international political agenda.

Canadian lawyer Robert Amsterdam, who defended jailed Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, said Russia is notorious for floating big plans to curry favour from foreign governments and companies but that go nowhere.

"God forbid our politicians take it seriously," Mr. Amsterdam said. "When I keep telling people that Russia uses energy as a weapon, these mega-project prognostications, now I can say quite frankly, 'Follow the Shtokman theme.' They lead countries by the nose; countries literally change their foreign policy so as not to confront the Russians based on these carrots, and then end up more often than not with nothing." (Financial Post)

* * * * * * * *

Given Russia's history of using trade as a weapon, do you think a direct oil pipeline between Russia and U.S., that would inevitably increase America's dependence on Russian oil, would be a good thing?

Yes
No
I'm Not Sure
- or get over your Oil Addiction..


Ballot #114218 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
94263. National Guard deployment along the southern U.S. border. Good idea, or bad idea?
112631. Honey you just need to lose those sides! Bad idea? Good idea? You decide!
87596. Nuking the moon clear out of the sky: Good idea or bad idea?
119080. Skydiving with a plastic grocery bag: GOOD IDEA or BAD IDEA?
74509. Do you think the idea of a united Europe is a good idea?
126880. Is it a GOOD IDEA or BAD IDEA to give your kid an allowance?
63981. New idea for a reality TV show: "Concentration Camp." Good idea or not?
74093. Did you ever have a really good idea come to you in a dream?
119664. OLPC : a good idea?
69557. Infant euthanesia: Good Idea?


COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes
That would be a long train ride from Moscow to Washington, about 20 days? I would fly, its not likely to be economicaly viable. It would be cool though.
by ABC on Mon Apr 23, 07 7:30am [+]

Voted : I'm Not Sure
I don't think so. Read this:

50% Good News Is the Bad News in Russian Radio

By ANDREW E. KRAMER

MOSCOW, April 21 — At their first meeting with journalists since taking over Russia’s largest independent radio news network, the managers had startling news of their own: from now on, they said, at least 50 percent of the reports about Russia must be “positive.”

In addition, opposition leaders could not be mentioned on the air and the United States was to be portrayed as an enemy, journalists employed by the network, Russian News Service, say they were told by the new managers, who are allies of the Kremlin.

How would they know what constituted positive news?

“When we talk of death, violence or poverty, for example, this is not positive,” said one editor at the station who did not want to be identified for fear of retribution. “If the stock market is up, that is positive. The weather can also be positive.”

In a darkening media landscape, radio news had been a rare bright spot. Now, the implementation of the “50 percent positive” rule at the Russian News Service leaves an increasingly small number of news outlets that are not managed by the Kremlin, directly or through the state national gas company, Gazprom, a major owner of media assets.

The three national television networks are already state controlled, though small-circulation newspapers generally remain independent.

by patch22us on Mon Apr 23, 07 7:50am [+]

Voted : I'm Not Sure
It would be cool. Totally impractical, but still cool.
by ThisIsNate on Mon Apr 23, 07 8:55am [+]

Voted : I'm Not Sure
Well, unlike Europe, Alaska and Canada already has plenty of the things that Russia is offering. I don't think it would create an energy dependency, but then on the other hand doesn't seem very necessary either.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Apr 23, 07 9:16am [+]

Voted : No
yeah, that's just what we need, a Putin lead communist regime having direct access to northamerica by high speed rail.
by LCD on Tue Apr 24, 07 10:50am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved