JOE LIEBERMAN SAYS VICTORY IS THE ONLY WAY IN IRAQ

search this site: search the web:

Vote on the Best, vote on the Worst, vote until your mouse finger hurts!

JOE LIEBERMAN SAYS VICTORY IS THE ONLY WAY IN IRAQ

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

JOE LIEBERMAN SAYS VICTORY IS THE ONLY WAY IN IRAQ

[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Mon Apr 30, 07 - Sat Jan 23, 10
To me (in Iraq), there is only one choice that protects America's security - and that is to stand, and fight, and win. Joe Lieberman, New York Post, 04-28-2007

* * * * * * * *

Are you with Joe? Do also believe that after four years of death and staggering expense, that regardless of the level of additional deaths and expense, that the only solution in Iraq is a military victory for the U.S. (not to mention Israel)?

Yes
No

Ballot #114441 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
83932. Predictions: Nothing Less Than Complete Victory in Iraq
115317. "Jerusalem" Joe Lieberman: "I see progress (in Iraq)." Troops disagree.
110985. Will Bush's troop "surge" in Iraq bring victory for the United States?
129817. Why doesn't Joe Lieberman just become a Republican?
112047. jerusalem joe lieberman wants a war on terror tax
100773. Does this show the truth about what Joe Lieberman really is, a Republican?
116588. is joe lieberman a secret war-hawk and a republican?
100389. Cheney's statement re: Terrorism and the Lieberman defeat
111787. Does Joe Lieberman appear to be flip-flopping on Hurricane Katrina?
113202. Jerusalem Joe Lieberman apparently wants to elect a war president

COMMENTS:
Voted : No
I thought it was already "Mission Accomplished". What else do we need to be there for but to protect Halliburton's interests and Israel's security?

by _Beelzebubba on Mon Apr 30, 07 9:31am [+]

Pandering to his constituency?

by elvislennon on Mon Apr 30, 07 9:33am [+]

Voted : No
Every military tactician has been saying the same thing for years: Times have changed. In WWI and WWII and before that, victory was a successful invasion and occupation. How did Bush and Co. forget the lesson that you can be victorious in invading another country and defeating their military and government...but the problem is in the occupation! No nation can be occupied in this day and age. The key is to have a concrete plan for invasion and in setting up a stable government to take root and govern. They did not plan for that. They planned only as far as the conquering and failed to prepare for changing the Iraqi government effectively.

The reason why there is so much push-back with Iraq is because we ALL know it was all based on a lie. Plain and simple. Had Iraq been the threat Bush and his war criminal administration said it was, an overwhelming majority of people would be supporting victory at all costs. Why should we for Iraq? Why should anyone? Just because?? Should we support total victory at all costs just to make Joe Lieberman and Bush feel better about themselves? No.

We did win. We invaded and conqured. The fact we are not winning the occupation was expected, but not planned for. That's their problem (meaning Bush and Co.)

by patch22us on Mon Apr 30, 07 11:38am [+]

Voted : Yes
And I wish to Deity that I weren't. This is *not* my America anymore. cry

by Truthseeker013 on Mon Apr 30, 07 5:10pm [+]

Voted : No
No

by skylab on Mon Apr 30, 07 9:42pm [+]

Voted : No
LIEberman should get his nose out of the chimp's arse and take in some fresh air 025

by Barbara_Baby_Cakes on Tue May 01, 07 5:01pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |