search this site: search the web:
Millions of web visitors a month. Millions of votes. Join Us!

WHY SHOULD THE GAMBLING FOOL BE THE DECIDER?

user ballots

WHY SHOULD THE GAMBLING FOOL BE THE DECIDER?


[+] ballot by Barbara_Baby_Cakes
ACTIVE Thu May 03, 07 - Sat Jul 11, 09

WASHINGTON - Just hours after the White House issued a veto threat Thursday, the House voted to add gender and sexual orientation to the categories covered by federal hate crimes law.

The House legislation, passed 237-180, also makes it easier for federal law enforcement to take part in or assist local prosecutions involving bias-motivated attacks. Similar legislation is also moving through the Senate, setting the stage for another veto showdown with President Bush.

The vote came after fierce lobbying from civil rights groups, who have been pushing for years for added protections against hate crimes, and social conservatives, who say the bill threatens the right to express moral opposition to homosexuality and singles out groups of citizens for special protection.

The White House, in a statement warning of a veto, said state and local criminal laws already cover the new crimes defined under the bill, and there was “no persuasive demonstration of any need to federalize such a potentially large range of violent crime enforcement.”

Hate crimes under current federal law apply to acts of violence against individuals on the basis of race, religion, color, or national origin. Federal prosecutors have jurisdiction only if the victim is engaged in a specific federally protected activity such as voting.

The House bill would extend the hate crimes category to include sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability and give federal authorities greater leeway to participate in hate crimes investigations. It approves $10 million over the next two years to help local law enforcement officials cover the cost of hate crimes prosecutions.

Federal investigators could step in if local authorities are unwilling or unable to act. The Human Rights Campaign, the country’s largest gay rights group, said this federal intervention could have made a difference in the case of Brandon Teena, the young Nebraska transsexual depicted in the movie “Boys Don’t Cry” who was raped after two friends discovered that he was biologically female and then murdered when local police did not arrest those responsible.

But Dr. James C. Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, warned that the true intent of the bill was “to muzzle people of faith who dare to express their moral and biblical concerns about homosexuality.” If you read the Bible in a certain way, he told his broadcast listeners, “you may be guilty of committing a ’thought crime.”’

Should "Gender" and "Sexual Orientation" be added to the categories covered by federal hate crimes law, Yes/No, Why/Why Not?

Yes, and here's why...
No, and here's why...

Ballot #114552 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
110672. Who is really the decider?
130285. Is gambling a sin?
95820. Is gambling immoral?
90916. Do You Pity the Fool?
130354. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me .....
130645. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
26993. What is the most amount of money you won after a night of gambling?
111698. Can You Name The Songs With The Word Fool In The Title...
4756. Should marijuana, prostitution, and gambling be allowed in churches?
115754. Las Vegas is no longer the world capital of gambling


COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes, and here's why...
What's a "thought crime?" I presume the law covers acts of violence, which is valid.
by skylab on Thu May 03, 07 4:49pm [+]

Ummm, no.

The whole idea of a hate law is non-sensical, not to mention prejudiced.

Only an idiot, or a self loathing white liberal, would support such discrimination.
by Doctordraw on Fri May 04, 07 4:07am [+]

lol @ that pic
by mojo on Fri May 04, 07 6:41am [+]

"self loathing white liberal"

wow...
by neothe1 on Sun Nov 04, 07 10:22pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved