NRA WANT TO MAKE SURE SUSPECTED TERRORISTS CAN BUY GUNS

user ballots

NRA WANT TO MAKE SURE SUSPECTED TERRORISTS CAN BUY GUNS


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Mon May 07, 07 - Sat Jan 30, 10

NRA: Don't ban gun sales to terror suspects

Group urges Bush administration to withdraw support for bill

The Associated Press

May 4, 2007

WASHINGTON - The National Rifle Association is urging the Bush administration to withdraw its support of a bill that would prohibit suspected terrorists from buying firearms.

Backed by the Justice Department, the measure would give the attorney general the discretion to block gun sales, licenses or permits to terror suspects.

In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., "would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat."

"As many of our friends in law enforcement have rightly pointed out, the word 'suspect' has no legal meaning, particularly when it comes to denying constitutional liberties," Cox wrote.

In a letter supporting the measure, Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling said the bill would not automatically prevent a gun sale to a suspected terrorist. In some cases, federal agents may want to let a sale go forward to avoid compromising an ongoing investigation.

Hertling also notes there is a process to challenge denial of a sale.

Current law requires gun dealers to conduct a criminal background check and deny sales if a gun purchaser falls under a specified prohibition, including a felony conviction, domestic abuse conviction or illegal immigration. There is no legal basis to deny a sale if a purchaser is on a terror watch list.

"When I tell people that you can be on a terrorist watch list and still be allowed to buy as many guns as you want, they are shocked," said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which supports Lautenberg's bill.

In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, lawmakers are weighing a number of measures to strengthen gun sale laws. The NRA, which usually opposes increased restrictions on firearms, is taking different positions depending on the proposal.

A 2005 study by the Government Accountability Office found that 35 of 44 firearm purchase attempts over a five-month period made by known or suspected terrorists were approved by the federal law enforcement officials. (MSNBC)

* * * * * * * *

So, if you're a critic of the Bush Administration, you are such a threat to America, you can be banned from flying on U.S. airlines, but if you are a Saudi national, fresh out of flight school, no one had better interfere with your god-given right to buy an assault rifle?

Do you agree with the NRA, that suspected terrorists should be able to buy guns?

Yes
No


Ballot #114647 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
77931. Do you think that deporting suspected terrorists is an effective means of defense?
114219. Would be allowed to carry concealed guns on campus make them safer?
114221. Would being allowed to carry concealed guns on campus make them safer?
119575. Could former terrorists be used to help make a country more secure?
50629. Does the fact that terrorists attack unpredictably and "cheap" make them impossible to defeat?
119602. Does America have the right to kidnap anyone suspected of a crime?
12969. Why is the Englishman's masculinity suspected being poofters by the rest of the world?
104349. Can Jonathan Edington Be Acquitted For Murder of Suspected Molester?
91269. How many guns do you own?
97341. Guns and abortion


COMMENTS:
Voted : No
Fucking hell. I thought we had some stupid fuckers here in the UK, but you have some really fucked up idiots in your country. I feel for you cranky, but keep strong, you will prevail...
by winston on Mon May 07, 07 4:27am [+]

Wouldnt it be fun if Herzog was here to debate this one with you eh? You wont get any disagreement from the overwhelmingly liberal users left on the site, thats for sure.

So, congratulations, everyone left on the site agrees with you. Isnt it fun when we all agree with one another?
by kingAlfredTheGreat on Mon May 07, 07 5:14am [+]

Well, Im no Republican, but I guess its my duty as one of the few semi-conservative users left on this gay hippy site to heckle you a little, so;

"In some cases, federal agents may want to let a sale go forward to avoid compromising an ongoing investigation"

Hidden away as it is, users may be forgiven for failing to realise that THIS is the crux of the article. Until they actually do something, no individual, whetehr suspected of terrorism or not, should be locked up indefinitely. As a liberal Im sure you will agree with that. Hence, it is often necessary for the authorities let terrorist suspects go about their business until they have accumulated enough evidence.

Now, if you were one of these terrorist suspects, and you actually WERE a potential terorist, wouldnt you find it slightly suspect ifm having no prior convictions, you were refused the constitutionally protected right to buy a gun? Dont you think that might give you a hint that you were being monitored?

So, regardless of your provactive title, there really isnt as much to this ballot as you suggests.

Your old nemesis Herzog would have pointed that out, if he hadnt been driven off the site.
by kingAlfredTheGreat on Mon May 07, 07 5:22am [+]

No, this is the crux of the article.

"In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., "would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat.""

The NRA isn't howling about this based on any practical consideration, they just want to make sure that terrorists' gun rights are protected. Essentially, they are selfishly willing to put the U.S. at risk of another 9/11, just to make sure that there isn't a single limitation on weapon ownership in America.
by cranky on Mon May 07, 07 7:47am [+]

NewGirl:

Then why can "innocent" people be kept off of airplanes?
by cranky on Mon May 07, 07 7:48am [+]

until I have proof, he must be considered 'innocent'.

Newgirl, don't confuse life with court. Suspicion can also save your life.

KinggayhippyAl: Hezog was not driven from this site. His parents took away his computer privileges and made him get a job. Perhaps you could "take him in" and lend him your computer.

by elvislennon on Mon May 07, 07 8:22am [+]

Voted : Yes
Yes, I agree with them.

I am against the idea of taking away the rights of a citizen for being a 'suspect'. A suspect should be treated as innocent until proven guilty, should be given a fair trial.

This is not a mere violation of the 2nd ammendment to the US constitution, it is a violation of the US code of 'innocent until proven guilty.'

So until someone is proven of being or have done something, it seems stripping them of their rights, treating them unequally in regards to the constitution, and assuming guilt is undesriable; so of course I agree with the NRA on this one.

Can't you see the difference between a 'suspected' terrorist and an individual of which there is solid proof that they are a terrorist or have terrorist motives? Can't you see the difference? Isn't it the norm to persecute a person after they have been proven of a crime?
by xxxxxxxx on Mon May 07, 07 9:49am [+]

Oh and of course herzog was driven off this site unjustly.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon May 07, 07 9:51am [+]

Wait a minute, surely this is too ironic?!

Arent these sort constitutional rights/liberties the ones that the LIBERALS are supposedely trying to support, and the Bush administration is covertly trying to strip away?

Just shows how the desire to be contrary to your enemies point of view can warp your own views eh?

"Careful, lest in hating you become that which you most despise"
by kingAlfredTheGreat on Mon May 07, 07 10:16am [+]

Voted : No
Excuse me while I confirm my one-way ticket to Nunavuat...
by Truthseeker013 on Mon May 07, 07 2:17pm [+]

Voted : No
But if terrorists can buy guns, they should end Patriot Act restrictions on the rest of the Bill of Rights.
by skylab on Mon May 07, 07 4:00pm [+]

Voted : Yes
Until somebody gives me a better (i.e. more specific) definition for "suspect," I'm gonna have to say yeah, I do agree. That said, I do think gun control should be tightened, but not to the point where suspects are completely denied rights without reason.
by himself809 on Mon May 07, 07 6:48pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved