user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
^ choice 1 should be "hear"
Voted : this is proof that we should not believe everything we read and here
Fact and fiction can now both be spread at the speed of light.
Voted : this is proof that we should not believe everything we read and here
I don't believe much of anything I read, which is why I read it all and sort the "what-might-be-true" from the "what-might-be-made-up".
Voted : this is proof that we should not believe everything we read and here
Corroboration some times still will leave you with an untruth: look at the reporting on the run up to the war(s)...so much so instead of reporters seeking to uncover the "truth, we have been reduced to a biased mediator (with assumed integrity) and two "experts" in many cases...as the saying goes, "believe half of what you see and none of what you hear...
To be honest, I didn't read most of that due to my short attention span (and beer brain deficiency) . ... but There'll always be liars, there'll always be scumbags. As long as you're intelligent enough to pick up on them, it'll all be ok :o)
Voted : this is proof that we should not believe everything we read and here
This story just shows that the so called anti-war movement really doesn't give a damn about the troops since they are so willing lie in order to tar all soldiers as war criminal.
^Nonsense. The anti-war movement as a whole didn't lie to tar all soldiers as war criminals. The movement was taken advantage of by one scumbag. The anti-war movement is far more supportive of our troops by wanting to keep them alive, than the rightwingers who are willing to throw their lives on the fire for the sake of egos and oil. And what about all the lying that the military has been doing over friendly fire, i.e., Pat Tillman?
i have to agree with cranky. it would be misguided to lay this all at the feet of the anti-war movement. everyone should be anti-war. if you think about it, it's the bush administration that doesn't give a damn about our troops -- hell, they sent them off to war on some personal vendetta and campaign for bush and cheney. it was a lie. so if any one or group doesn't give a damn, it's the bush/cheney folk who sit safely in the white house sending young men and women off to die for their lie.
Voted : this is proof that we should not believe everything we read and here
instant communications also helps extinguish opportunist, lies, like his, rapidly, as well.
by MO_ on Mon May 21, 07 8:33pm
[+]
|
|