COMMENTS:
Voted : Harry
Since I don't have to pay the bills for either of them or their dad or grandmum, I'm going to go with the kid brother. He's a hothead at times and sometimes makes a monkey of himself in public (NAZI insignia...?!?), but he has a certain panache I find admirable, including his apparently sincere wish to place himself in harm's way while serving in the military. He also has a kind of insociant attitude I like, probably because he knows that he has about zero chance of ever actually becoming the English monarch.
Correct word as: "insouciant."
Voted : Neither
One is the bastard child of James Hewitt and the other a plum-sucking nonce.
Both have got faces like smacked arses and both deserve to be shipped off to Iraq immediately.
They are a blight, blot and embarrassment on the cultural landscape of Britain. Which, to be fair, as all the class of a dungheap.
Never really thought about either , but if I had to choose one to hang out with, I think it would be Harry, he's seems more like everyday people, I could probably carry on a conversation with him and feel comfortable, where as with WIlliam, not so sure. Of course I'm only going by clips I see on the news, not really a good way to know someone.
Voted : Neither
I like both of them.
Voted : William
Harry's a loumouthed smartarse whose beatdown is long overdue
The whole idea of royalty seems absurd? What does it mean? Before (in England) you inherited power without ever having to serve at a lower office or to be elected to office. And now (in England) all it means is that you WOULD HAVE inherited power. Who cares? But hey, if that's how people want to spend their tax dollars, have at it.
Yes, Widehead, I think a DNA test is called for in the case of Prince Harry.
Voted : Neither
The notion of "royalty" doesn't sit well with me.
|
