ARE THEY REALLY NUTS? [+] serious ballot by robotthinker ACTIVE Fri Jul 13, 07 - Wed Jan 09, 08 It's disappointing to me that most people won't even consider the other side of an argument if their is either : * a unified (or near) media campaign squarely attacking that viewpoint and the holders of such views as fringe kooks.They simply buy into the presentation without much consideration. or * isn't a sizable percentage of people who ascribe to that given viewpoint Well>> I've dropped out of and steered clear 9/11 arguments because I've seen the same personal attacks replace what could have been good and productive dialog of opposing points.It always whittles down to name-calling and questioning one's sanity.It isn't worth my time. Since most people rely on their television,publishing companies and popular consensus just to verify the validity of questioning official accounts on everything what do you make of the following list of questioners,skeptics and disbelievers of the official account of 9/11 ? Sadly it requires such a substantial list to even get people to even consider another side of an argument but here it is for those of you of that ilk. please google in patriots question 9/11 please also observe the list to the upper left side of the page: 160 + Architects and Engineers , 140 + Professors , 110 + survivors and family members , 80 + media professionals, ... This ballot question is for discussing the claim that people who question the official account are crazy or fringe.Was it really fair to label and portray them that way?Don't waste my time arguing in circles,changing the subject and avoiding the direct question.This question addresses the tactics to smear opponents and not the events of 9/11. not fair fair,they're all crazy SORRY, THIS POLL IS NOW CLOSED. Ballot #116215 : Voting Finished : SEE RESULTS Comment: Register to submit comments You may still vote without registration show your vote with comment?

v 2.0

© BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank: