COMMENTS:
Voted : yes
But, with this Guv'mint, hypocrisy is the order of the day.
Voted : yes
yes. we prefer the term sexual orientation. preference makes it seem like a choice. good question larry. while i personally support civil unions for same sex couples, in the end, it's a national question and the majority rule needs to be the decider.
"hey! i'm the decider. not you. me. me is the decider. i decide. you don't. heh-heh, me. i'm the decider."
It doesn't effect my life, so either way...
by aya on Mon Jul 16, 07 8:35am
[+]
^ that's what i like. people who take a definitive stand. you go girl! 
Good question, larrynelmira!
Community property and other rights afforded to heterosexual married people should be given to any couple in a legal 'marriage'. I do believe that there are laws in place to disallow one to legally 'marry' his dog or his mother. Sexual orientation should not be a consideration in a legal 'marriage'.
Hey, does anyone remember that line from the Simpsons? Marge said something to the effect of: "You're giving these gay couples the most important expression of love; a legal binding marriage."
by aya on Mon Jul 16, 07 8:53am
[+]
"sexual orientation", I'll remember that kev :)
Voted : yes
Yes
|
