search this site: search the web:
Welcome to our New Server! Stronger, faster, with 10% bodyfat!
.it may take about 24 hours to make sure everything got transferred here all right.

IS JOE LIEBERMAN A SECRET WAR-HAWK AND A REPUBLICAN?

user ballots

IS JOE LIEBERMAN A SECRET WAR-HAWK AND A REPUBLICAN?


[+] serious ballot by Kev24
created Tue Jul 31, 07

Lieberman escalates attack on Iraq critics

Ever since Connecticut Democrats refused to back him for a fourth term in Congress, Joe Lieberman has been burnishing his independent credentials in the narrowly divided Senate while becoming increasingly critical of the Democratic Party on the war in Iraq.

Lieberman, the Democrats’ 2000 vice presidential nominee, insists he is not actively considering joining the Republican Party. But he is keeping that possibility wide open as his disenchantment grows with Democratic leaders. The main sticking points are their attempts to end the war in Iraq and their hesitation to take a harder line against Iran.

“I think either are, in my opinion, respectfully, naïve in thinking we can somehow defeat this enemy with talk, or they’re simply hesitant to use American power, including military power,” Lieberman said in a wide-ranging interview with The Hill.

Lieberman says he is annoyed by the mudslinging on Capitol Hill and Democrats’ unwillingness to work with President Bush. But his critics say he has contributed to that polarization by his rhetoric and refusal to compel Bush to find a new way forward in Iraq.

But if Lieberman seems blunt about the direction of the Democratic Party, it may stem from his loss last August in the primaries to businessman Ned Lamont, who wooed Democratic voters with his anti-war platform.

Lieberman was the only non-Republican in June to vote against Democratic efforts to pass a resolution expressing no confidence on embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. He has no plans to endorse a Democrat for president, including the senior senator from his home state, Christopher Dodd, and is open to backing a Republican candidate for president. Lieberman also startled Democrats when he lent his support to the re-election bid of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a top target of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

During this month’s Iraq debate, Lieberman was working behind the scenes strategizing with Republicans and was front-and-center in several GOP press conferences denouncing Democratic tactics to push for an end to the war.

Lieberman was the lone non-Republican to vote against Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) efforts to shut down debate on an amendment to bring troops home by next April. (Reid voted against the cloture motion to file a similar motion at a later time.) Lieberman was also alone when he joined 40 Republicans in voting to kill an amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to extend the time between troop deployments in Iraq.

The distance that Democratic leaders appear to be keeping from Lieberman could result from the animosity that the Democrats’ anti-war base has directed toward him. That criticism intensified even more last month, when he suggested military intervention against the Iranian government.

“He used to have a heart and soul, and he used to care about people,” said Leslie Angeline, an activist with the anti-war group Code Pink, who held a 24-day hunger strike until she could meet with Lieberman about his position on Iran.
Angeline is facing an unlawful entry charge after she refused to leave Lieberman’s office during her strike.

Even though Lieberman has become a lightning rod on the left, his prominent chairmanship and influence within the Democratic caucus is safe, for now, given the Democrats’ razor-thin majority. Analysts say if Democrats increase their Senate majority from the 2008 elections, Lieberman’s influence and role could be marginalized within the caucus.

Still, Lieberman is unfazed and says he has no intention of formally rejoining the Democratic Party.

“For now, I find being an independent more fun,” Lieberman said. “The partisanship in this place is out of control. As an independent I’ve got the opportunity to speak out against that.”


^ so why would he oppose a vote to expess no confidence in alberto gonzles? he seems more like a republican to me.

is joe lieberman a wolf in sheeps clothing? is he actively working for republican causes because they are his causes? do you think joe lieberman wants us to attack iran and if so, why?

good peeps of b&w, tell us what you think of joe lieberman.

joe lieberman is untrustworthy
joe lieberman is a good man and is to be trusted
i will comment below

Ballot #116588 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
129817. Why doesn't Joe Lieberman just become a Republican?
100773. Does this show the truth about what Joe Lieberman really is, a Republican?
115736. jerusalem joe lieberman raising money for a republican candidate
112047. jerusalem joe lieberman wants a war on terror tax
114441. Joe Lieberman says victory is the only way in Iraq
100389. Cheney's statement re: Terrorism and the Lieberman defeat
111787. Does Joe Lieberman appear to be flip-flopping on Hurricane Katrina?
113202. Jerusalem Joe Lieberman apparently wants to elect a war president
113432. Lieberman Accuses War Vet Warner Of Not Supporting The Troops
115543. Joe Lieberman supports possible military attack on Iran


COMMENTS:
Voted : joe lieberman is untrustworthy
During this month’s Iraq debate, Lieberman was working behind the scenes strategizing with Republicans and was front-and-center in several GOP press conferences denouncing Democratic tactics to push for an end to the war.


Lieberman was the only non-Republican in June to vote against Democratic efforts to pass a resolution expressing no confidence on embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.


Lieberman was also alone when he joined 40 Republicans in voting to kill an amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to extend the time between troop deployments in Iraq.


Lieberman also startled Democrats when he lent his support to the re-election bid of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a top target of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.



^^ personally i think those facts alone prove what he's really all about.
by Kev24 on Tue Jul 31, 07 11:30am [+]

Voted : i will comment below
When it's anything dealing with war he does seem to be on the side of the war makers.
by larrynelmira on Tue Jul 31, 07 12:47pm [+]

Voted : joe lieberman is untrustworthy
Man alive...Joe, there's partisanship, and then there's selling out cold. Guess where you landed?
by Truthseeker013 on Tue Jul 31, 07 4:41pm [+]

I've long been aware of the concept of Democrats holding strong conservative values, and of Republicans harboring strong liberal values. Their own parties have even gone so far as to brand them (Yellow Dogs and Blue somethings, can't remember what exactly), and I can understand and respect that, because a strict pigeonholing of people along party lines gets us nowhere. But this bit from Lieberman, henceforth known as the King of Flip-Floppers, is just bewildering. It wouldn't surprise me at all if one of the GOP candidates were to offer him the VP spot on their ticket once nominated. A lineup like that, claiming "true bipartisanship" :P just might win. (shudder)
by Truthseeker013 on Tue Jul 31, 07 4:44pm [+]

I must in all fairness, at this time, tender an apology to Mister Lieberman. I had him crossed up with Joe Biden, and it was from that that I made the basis of my statement.
by Truthseeker013 on Wed Aug 01, 07 7:40am [+]

Voted : joe lieberman is untrustworthy
Way to go, J-Joe!

Traitor.
by _Beelzebubba on Wed Aug 01, 07 1:04pm [+]

truthseeker, how you could mean joe biden makes no sense. what you wrote applies to joe lieberman. do you know who you mean?
by Kev24 on Wed Aug 01, 07 1:24pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2009 BEST AND WORST dot com All Rights Reserved