THE THREAT TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

user ballots

THE THREAT TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION


[+] serious ballot by patch22us
created Wed Aug 08, 07

This ballot stems from the comments made by two very intelligent users.

The issue of off-shore outsourcig of manufacturing, particularly to China, is heating up once again.

In my other ballot, I pointed out that the media, especially the Internet and "blogs" have blown the issue out of proportion in some ways. For example, if you believed the likes of Lou Dobbs and some bloggers, China is the largest manufacturer and expoter in the world and the planet is doomed to sucombe to China. Really?

Reality: The United States, by a wide margin, is still the largest manufacturer in the world and the USA and Germany are pretty much tied for the number 1 spot as top exporter, with both exporting about $1.1 trillion in hard made goods in each respective country.

So what about China? China is credited with exporting about $900 billion per year. But, what the mainstream press, like Lou Dobbs, leaves out, is that 60% of that is actually NOT theirs! A little of 60% of that $900 billion is actually goods they manufacture FOR compaines/country's like the USA, the UK, Italy, etc., etc. So in fact, China is only exporting about $360 bllion dollars.

But there is a major crisis facing the entire Western world, and that is the cost of goods. Another user on here today said that in his country, workers in McDonald's earn about $14.00 per hour, vs. .57 center per hour for the same worker in China.

Now consider manufacturing. In the USA or any Western nation, a factory worker might earn $20, $25, $30 or even $40 per hour! Why? So a factory worker in the United States might make $25.00 per hour, or $1000.00 per week or...$52,000.00 per year (not including overtime, which I read can be time and a half or even double time!) So realistically, that worker may actually earn $60,000.00 per year and that does NOT include benefits, which I read could cost the company aobut $5,000.00 per year for health coverage. Now add to that retirement benefits and it could actually mean that in addition to the $60,000.00 per year salary, the company may still be spending $10,000 more in benefits.

So how can we as a "civilization" expect to compete with countries like India or China, where the total they pay per worker, per hour, might only be $3 - 4 dollars?

I'm not making a statement and not making a judgement, but I hear this all the time: unions and greed have literally put the Facorty worker in the USA and Western Europe on the endangered list.

My question is, do you reasonalby think it is a good value to compensate a Factory worker $40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or even $90,000.00 per year?

Yes. It is reasonable to expect a company to pay a factory woker that much money.
No. I do not think it is reasonable to pay a Facotory worker that much money.
Economically, it is unreasonalbe to pay a factory worker that much and we need to reassess it


Ballot #116823 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
106017. Is Western Civilization superior?
106710. Do you personally consider Israel to be part of Western Civilization?
80076. Which city has contributed more to Western Civilization: Paris or Houston?
117623. Is the threat of an Orwellian future in western society legitimate?
13456. European civilization vs. Asian civilization. Which ones better?
112245. The Threat Factor: Was Iraq Really A Threat To The United States ?
1442. WHAT NATION WILL BE THE NEXT BIG CIVILIZATION AFTER USA?
8807. The greatest civilization...
9770. What civilization will be the next to go extinct?
13618. What would you do moments before the end of civilization?


COMMENTS:
Okay, so if it's reasonable, how about explaining why? So if you were shopping for a DVD player and went into one store and it was $100.00, but you knew for a fact that in a store 3 blocks away, it was only $70.00 are you telling me you would not walk the 3 short blocks to get if for $70.00?
by patch22us on Wed Aug 08, 07 3:28pm [+]

Sorry, that "okay" was to the brave soul who voted that it was reasonable, but failed to comment.
by patch22us on Wed Aug 08, 07 3:28pm [+]

Voted : No. I do not think it is reasonable to pay a Facotory worker that much money.
unless its a profit share then why not, if the owners are making lots of money they couldnt do it without their staff

i make more than that 100k and work less hours, but as a commission sales person, no sales =no $, at the same time the support staff that work around me make 35,000 and probably work harder and definatly longer, but we all make our choices in life
by ABC on Wed Aug 08, 07 4:20pm [+]

Voted : Yes. It is reasonable to expect a company to pay a factory woker that much money.
Its FAR more reasonable to pay a factory worker a good wage/salary than it is to pay a CEO 300 million dollars to drive a company into the ground and/or offshore all its workers. Not to mention paying golden parachutes to those executives who do what I described above. Its certainly possible to pay workers a decent wage. For many years especially in the 50s and 60s, American workers were well paid, America exported far more than it imported and American products were known for quality and the envy of the world. Of course the gap between the lowest paid and CEO was FAR less than it is today. Its certainly possible if you invest in tools to increase productivity instead of the short-term "solution" of sending the jobs overseas. When all the jobs except McDonald's and Walmart are in India and China, who will buy the DVDs and other products? Just the rich and those heavily invested in the stock market.

Here's the irony... implementing a national health care program would remove a big expense from companies and make them more competitive. One of the biggest drags on the auto companies is health care - remove that cost and they are more competitive. Blaming things on unions is just conservative crap propaganda. Its greed from the rich. There's no logic in sending good jobs to China and India unless you are replacing them with something better here. And... there aren't any better replacements here.

Really patch... I don't want to make this personal but I doubt you have any connection with the reality that the average Joe faces.
by TinCan on Wed Aug 08, 07 4:21pm [+]

Well Tincan, you sort of already did make it personal. :) So you answer the question I posed above:

Would you pay the $100.00 for the DVD player, or walk 3 blocks and buy it for $75.00?

You make it personal Tincan because you assume you speak for "the average Joe" and you do not. Nor do I. The points you make about the over-paid CEO and the perks are valid. No doubt about it. But you fail to address the issue: What do you expect? Do you expect them to pay the average Western Factory worker the $5, $60 or even $80,000.00 per year, plus benefits, or do you expect they will go to where they pay maybe $3.00 per hour?

Are you telling me you never shop around for the best price? Are you saying that you just pay the asking price of who ever happens to come along first, even if it is the highest price?

The western consumer is bi-polar. They want a vast selection of products to buy and they have a fit if it costs too much. So the question I posed was simple (in case you didn't see it, I distinctly put the following in my ballot description: "I'm not making a statement and not making a judgement, but I hear this all the time: unions and greed have literally put the Facorty worker in the USA and Western Europe on the endangered list. "

So either you blatantly disregard that in order to make a personal attack, which seems to be your mission, or you legitimatley missed it.

So Tincan, instead of making, yet again, assumptions on MY views, read the ballot and answer with rational responses and not attacks. Thanks. Or else you can just avoid my ballots, since I believe we have each other on our ignore lists.
by patch22us on Wed Aug 08, 07 4:33pm [+]

For those, like TinCan, who wish to make the wrong assumptions, let me once again point out from above:

"I'm not making a statement and not making a judgement, but I hear this all the time: unions and greed have literally put the Facorty worker in the USA and Western Europe on the endangered list.

My question is, do you reasonalby think it is a good value to compensate a Factory worker $40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or even $90,000.00 per year? "


Call me crazy, but last I checked, posing a question and stressing you are not of one view or the other, constitued the stimulus for debate and not an attack or wrong assumptions by some people on the motives, beliefs or views of the person asking the question. Clear now?
by patch22us on Wed Aug 08, 07 4:55pm [+]

no one will learn. just like no lame ass politician will address the issue. it's why they want to let 13 mil illegal aliens in. cheap labor. dolts.
by Kev24 on Thu Aug 09, 07 3:45pm [+]

HOnestly, I was thinking more along the environment...but China doesn't really come to mind
by aya on Thu Aug 09, 07 4:45pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved