user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
The following is copied text, I didn't know how to say it in more understandable terms: The Big Bang model was a natural outcome of Einstein's General Relativity as applied to a homogeneous universe. However, in 1917, the idea that the universe was expanding was thought to be absurd. So Einstein invented the cosmological constant as a term in his General Relativity theory that allowed for a static universe. In 1929, Edwin Hubble announced that his observations of galaxies outside our own Milky Way showed that they were systematically moving away from us with a speed that was proportional to their distance from us. The more distant the galaxy, the faster it was receding from us. The universe was expanding after all, just as General Relativity originally predicted! Hubble observed that the light from a given galaxy was shifted further toward the red end of the light spectrum the further that galaxy was from our galaxy. So, what is beyond that? Einstein is commonly quoted as having said something to the affect that there are only two ways to perceive miracles, either everything is a miracle, or nothing is a miracle.
I believe that space and time and energy and matter are all part of the expansion from the Big Bang. I think there is a limit beyond which not even empty space exists.
Voted : other, see comment
My theory is that the Cosmos (my word for the Universe, because I'm a renegade at heart) is transfinite in volume, and recurved on itself spatiotemporally. Mass, therefore, would also me transfinite (huge but measurable). But I'm a renegade in the community, so I wouldn't farm that around.
*proceeds to farm this around* I had to save that picture so I can shrink it to look at it :o
by Jyl on Tue Sep 04, 07 8:54pm
[+]
Voted : other, see comment
I think at any given point in time, the universe does have a calculable mass, but it is not a valid measurement the moment after that and the moment after that and so on because it is always expanding.
Jyl, if you get any feedback, tell them that I said to "Bite my shiny metal a$$", okay?
^^ Matter can't be created or destroyed though. If the universe is expanding, it's decreasing in density and keeping a constant mass. From what I understand, it's quite heavy.
|
|