user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : it's friendly to the environment
In a delicious-smelling way, I suppose. I heard the exhaust smells like a restaurant. Hats off to you for sticking it to OPEC and the rest of those goons.
Voted : it's harmful to the environment
The crops currently used for bio fuels in the United States are resource intensive. Corn requires significant fertilization (nitrates), and soybeans require large tracts of land. Vegetable oil has slightly higher particulate emissions (the stuff that causes smog) than diesel, and bio diesel. However, bio diesel releases fewer particulates than regular diesel Vegetable oil and bio diesel emissions are virtually sulfur-free. Burning either fuel releases less sulfur (which is one of the main causes of acid rain) than diesel. Bio diesel and vegetable oil release fewer hydrocarbons than diesel. Bio diesel and vegetable oil release less carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide than regular petroleum based diesel. Vegetable oil and bio diesel emit about 10% more NO 2 than regular diesel but less SO 2. These two emissions operate inversely due to the temperature at which the fuel is burned. The more NO 2 a vehicle emits, the less SO 2 it will release, and vice-versa.
Voted : it's harmful to the environment
the lesser of two evils? i'm working on an engine that runs on happy meal toys. we will never run out of fuel again.
Wow, Randy. You sure did your homework. As for my comment, when I referred to the environment, I meant my nose.
|
|