9/11 ENQUIRY; HOW DID THE WTC TOWERS COLLAPSE?

user ballots

9/11 ENQUIRY; HOW DID THE WTC TOWERS COLLAPSE?


[+] serious ballot by Andrew_Anorak
created Wed Oct 24, 07

Fires caused by crashes made the towers unstable
rigged explosives

Ballot #119021 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
79457. Why did WTC 7 inexplicably collapse into it's own footprint 8 hours after the collapse of the twin towers?
118853. 9/11 ENQUIRY; Who crashed those plains into the WTC towers & Pentagon?
97225. Did Larry Silverstein benefit financially from the collapse of the WTC Towers?
59233. Experts agree that steel in WTC towers did NOT collapse on 9/11 due to thermal stress. Will the government ever admit to this?
118842. What will be the result of the Diana enquiry?
118914. 9/11 ENQUIRY; Could the goverment have stopped 9/11?
119042. 9/11 ENQUIRY; Did the goverment know about 9/11 but let it happen ?
122304. 9/11 ENQUIRY; Questions conspiracy theorists MUST answer.
74543. With the EU on the verge of collapse what do you think will become of them?
97416. How did building #7 of the WTC collapse?


COMMENTS:
Voted : Fires caused by crashes made the towers unstable
--but I see nothing about the rigged explosives hypothesis which conclusively refutes the commonly accepted version of events.
by Applerod on Wed Oct 24, 07 9:57pm [+]

If you still believe the explosves conspiract theory, how did they manage to rig the towers without anyone noticing?
by Andrew_Anorak on Thu Oct 25, 07 11:26am [+]

I don't believe the explosives theory, but even if I did the presence of explosives is conclusive evidence of nothing. Some 'conspiracy theorists' believe that explosives could only have been planted by the Bush administration; they feel the idea that al Qaeda could have planted these explosives to be absurd. But it's not outside the realm of possibility that--particularly in light of the failed 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center--Bin Laden & al Qaeda would have wanted to make absolutely certain the buildings would fall, so they planted explosives to be sure to finish the job. I don't how they would have accomplished that because I don't believe explosives were involved.
What do you think?
by Applerod on Thu Oct 25, 07 6:03pm [+]

Voted : Fires caused by crashes made the towers unstable
Technically it was a combination of massive structural damage AND fires.

by wideheadofknowledge on Fri Oct 26, 07 9:11am [+]

downward
by neothe1 on Sat Nov 03, 07 9:30pm [+]

Anyone who thinks rigged explosives brought down the World Trade Center is a fucking idiot!
by Guest User from [76.90.129.150] on Tue Nov 27, 07 12:33am [+]

Voted : Fires caused by crashes made the towers unstable
Don't you know the fires didn't melt the steel but only weakened them? Which caused them to be unstable and collapse. There have been no reports of molten steel. People just want to create an alternative view of how the twin towers could have collapse but the truth is that 2 planes were hijacked and flown into the twin towers causing the fires which weakened the frames causing them to collapse. Everyone knows this, even all you conspiracy theorist know this. You're all just making this garbage up to place the blame on our own president to find a way to impeach bush all because of the 2000 election where the majority of people, well all you democrats thought the election was unfair due to the number of votes when really it was completely accurate but you all just want to find a way to take bush out of office because he wasn't the candidate you voted for back in 2000. Thats what this is all about, the election in 2000 nothing else. Even the man who created the loose change conspiracy video knows he is a fraud.
by usedcarparts on Thu Jan 03, 08 2:17am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved