WHICH NATIONS HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND SHOULD BE DISARMED?

user ballots

WHICH NATIONS HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND SHOULD BE DISARMED?


[+] joke ballot by zikzakcorporation
created Wed Jan 07, 04

I will not include Iraq because it has been conquered by the US and no weapons were there to begin with anyway.

Korea
China
Israel
Pakistan
India
United States
Australia
Syria
Khazakstan
Presybytarianistan
Libya
occupied palestine ("israel")
All nations that have them


Ballot #12066 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
54067. 'The desire to create weapons of mass destruction' is NOT the same as actually HAVING weapons of mass destruction. Do you agree?
83443. Weapons of Mass destruction]!!!
89393. Is the possession of weapons of mass destruction immoral (regardless of country, organization or group)?
64612. "We're going to Iraq because Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!!!!!" -- Republicans, circa early 2003.
39479. Dose the U.S. military use macdonalds as a weapon of mass destruction?
74935. After eating a lot, my ass can be considered a weapon of mass destruction. Should I fear Bush going ... well, you know ... ?
68978. Weapons of Mass Destraction - the most dangerous in George W. Bush's arsenal?
72299. What gives the U.S. the right to dictate nuclear or other weapons policy to other nations?
4762. The CHINESE deserve to be DISARMED.
66346. Is a disarmed public desirable?


COMMENTS:
How about all of them?
Cowards.
by Stewie on Thu Jan 08, 04 7:20am [+]

New York? You dunce.
by zikzakcorporation on Mon Jan 12, 04 6:14pm [+]

USA and Israel should be disarmed. These two are the biggest bullies around and biggest threats to peace.
by SAS on Fri Jan 23, 04 11:44am [+]

You put Saddam in power and gave him the weapons. That's how nice you are.
by SAS on Fri Jan 23, 04 1:42pm [+]

SAS, you're a pretty reasonable guy. That's an oddity around here. Good to meet ya, man.
by xxxxxxxx on Fri Jan 23, 04 5:01pm [+]

Thanks flagrantviolator. Pleased to meet you too as you seem to be an intelligent and objective fellow yourself. It's good to have at least few voices of reason in this madhouse.
by SAS on Sat Jan 24, 04 5:48am [+]

SAS, what kind of a stupid response is that? You would prefer a loose cannon like North Korea (who has lobbed missiles over Japan) or the ultimate bully China (would have no qualms about nuking Taiwan, a free and peace loving nation China loves to push around on a daily basis) or Russia (who can't keep track of the ones they already have now) or Pakistan (Who is one coup away from being run by an islamo-nut, who would nuke Europe after he struck the US, because after all the FUNDIES HATE YOU TOO.) Israel and the US are not gonna nuke you tomorrow you know. Not everything is our fault, we are just the scapegoats for idiots.
by Lucky on Wed Mar 03, 04 7:52pm [+]

It isnt just nations that can deploy WMDs..

Terrorist groups, even individuals could technically be capable of independantly deploying even the most terrifying of weapons, the atomic bomb.

With the manhatten project we opened pandoras box and the nuclear spectre which was within will haunt us for a very long time if it does not kill us all first.
by Mobius on Wed Apr 14, 04 7:29pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved