DEATH SQUADS, AMERICAN STYLE

user ballots

DEATH SQUADS, AMERICAN STYLE


[+] ballot by quirk99
ACTIVE Thu Jan 03, 08 - Fri Jan 02, 09

The article (below) was about the sentencing of a soldier for participating in the ad hoc execution of three Iraqi prisoners, and the bulk of the article was devoted to the intricacies of the plea bargaining among the four perpetrators of the crime. But, as is surprisingly common in the mainstream press, the reporter, Paul von Zielbauer, sneaked in the really big news towards the end of the article. The key paragraphs (introduced as the perpetrator’s rationale for the execution) are these, which discuss the orders given the soldiers by their brigade commander, Colonel Michael D. Steele:

“Several soldiers in Private Clagett’s platoon have said in sworn statements that Colonel Steele told his men that they would be attacking a stronghold of Al Qaeda and ordered them to kill all men of military age they encountered during the raid.

“Colonel Steele, in sworn testimony to Army investigators that has not been made public, said he had not given orders using those exact words, but had warned his soldiers to expect a fierce battle. He was reprimanded by an Army general last summer for issuing confusing rules of engagement that investigators said had contributed to the deaths of the three Iraqi men and a fourth man killed during the raid”.

If we can look past Colonel Steele’s denial, which contains the concessionary point that he did not use these “exact words,” we get some real insight into the goals of American units when they are sent into “insurgent strongholds”: their job is to kill as many “men of military age” as they can.

We should all be given pause by the heinous brutality of this strategy…; and by the fact that it is a violation of virtually every international law and custom meant to deter war crimes…; and by the fact that this strategy is the sin qua non of state terrorism….; and by the fact that Saddam Hussein sometimes engaged in this very strategy.

But when we get past the upset and sadness and outrage from this, it is worth observing that this is exactly what the death squads in Baghdad have been doing for the last year. Like the Americans, they enter a “stronghold of Al Qaeda” searching for “terrorists,” usually under the color of law as Iraqi police or internal security personnel (many are, in fact, police or internal security special forces commanded by Iraqi or even American officials in the Ministry of the Interior). And, like the Americans, they are confident that “all men of military age” in this community are in fact active members or supporters of the insurgency; so they arrest, torture and assassinate as many as they can corral in a single foray. So what’s the difference between the Americans and the Iraqis? Only the torture part, and we can’t even be sure of that.

The worst of this is that we cannot even hide behind the meager hope that Colonel Steele is an anomaly and other brigade commanders do not issue orders to “kill all men of military age.” Sadly, the best evidence strongly indicates that this is indeed a policy, and that its lethal consequences have resulted in the murder of over a hundred thousand Iraqis since the U.S. arrived. One succinct way to document its prevalence is to look at the evidence from the Lancet study of violent death in Iraq, which concluded that at least 30% of the 600,000 victims of violence since the war began were killed by bullets fire or bombs dropped by American troops. Even if we remove the deaths due to bombing (8% of the total), we are left with 150,000 or so deaths from American bullets, or about 100 day, every day for the 1500 or so days since the American invasion.

Or, put another way, on their most brutal day, the Iraqi death squads kill about as many Iraqis “men of military age” as the U.S. death squads kill on an average day. And, while the Iraqi squads have been operating for only a year, and for only a few months at high levels, the Americans have been hard at work for 45 months. And, the number of American soldiers available to staff these death squads is going to increase by almost 15% in the next few months.

What a nightmare.

Time to impeach
nah its all lies
The shame has destroyed my resistance


Ballot #122242 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
123026. Should America Have Death Squads Like Columbia?
66306. Are American Propaganda Hit Squads fair?
50193. What does the average American want with military-style assault weapons??
66414. Are Propaganda Hit Squads fair?
125839. Which U.S. States Still Use Firing Squads In Executions ?
118934. Should American game shows add a "life or death" element?
76998. Are the death of 2,000 American soldiers worth protecting Israel from Iraq?
106536. Death penalty sought in baby's microwave death
23305. If you were sentenced to death, what mode of death would you chose?
119704. Should people who fake their own death get the death penalty?


COMMENTS:
For those who put its lies. bear in mind that this article is about PROVEN FACTUAL events.

Which just goes to show that even with the truth in front of them people will automatically toe the perty line.
by quirk99 on Thu Jan 03, 08 10:46am [+]

Voted : Time to impeach
We ignored all this and re-elected the butt monkey for the second term.

I lost all faith in humanity after that.
by LCD on Thu Jan 03, 08 10:46am [+]

Voted : The shame has destroyed my resistance
USA! Home of the brave!

Given the state of the education system today, in five years they'll have more soldiers than they can handle to fight those proxy wars.
by _Beelzebubba on Thu Jan 03, 08 11:10am [+]

Soooo... if I understand you correctly, ONE event means that the US now has thousands of death squads roaming Iraq and killing innocent people? Come on...

This is bad but its hardly "evidence" of brutal "death squads" on the loose.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Thu Jan 03, 08 12:46pm [+]

^ read it again FF you might understand it after more than one read. Iraq is the event. Unless you think that these people really were terrorists?? Wouldn`t surprise me at all.
by quirk99 on Thu Jan 03, 08 1:08pm [+]

you understand me only in as much as the fact that america has thousands of death squads roaming iraq. they are called soldiers.

Its what they get paid for. following orders and taking the crap.


You can tie it up as "One event" if you like. But it seems to me like its rhe modus operendi of the american army.
by quirk99 on Thu Jan 03, 08 2:10pm [+]

Voted : Time to impeach
The time is long come and gone, but never goes away. Bush and Cheney have done so much harm to this country. Their way is NOT the way of the people. No way, no how. They are criminals. I do see the point that this does not mean this is wide-spread, but still, under Bush and his criminal administration, the line of right and wrong has been blured. I can't wait for him to go.
by patch22us on Thu Jan 03, 08 2:19pm [+]

You can tie it up as "One event" if you like. But it seems to me like its rhe modus operendi of the american army.
by quirk99 on Thu Jan 03, 08 2:10pm


In all fariness Quirk99, while I am not at all dismissing the article above, let's be honest here. All major armies involved in "war" have had these charges made against them. The Soviet Union sure did in Eastern Europe and Afghanistan and even the British army has faced charges in Iraq.

While this article is from 2005, it's just one example:

British soldiers face war crimes charges for killing Iraqi civilians
By Richard Tyler
28 July 2005

Three British soldiers face war crimes charges arising from the killing of an Iraqi civilian. Mr. Baha Mousa, a 26-year old hotel receptionist, was arrested in September 2003 and taken to British Army Headquarters in Basra, southern Iraq. He died the next day. A post mortem found strangulation marks, a broken nose and three broken ribs.

Corporal Donald Payne is charged with manslaughter and faces a second charge of “inhuman treatment of persons.” Two other soldiers from the Queen’s Lancashire Regiment, Lance Corporal Wayne Cowcroft and Private Darren Fallon, also face the same charge, which falls within the provisions of the International Criminal Court Act.

Four soldiers from the regiment, which had 620 soldiers stationed in Basra between June and November 2003, also face indictments arising from the killing of Mousa. Sergeant Kelvin Stace is charged with committing assault and Warrant Officer Mark Davies with neglecting to perform a duty. Major Michael Peebles and Colonel Jorge Mendonca, the senior officer in charge, face a charge of negligently performing a duty.

In a second case, four soldiers have been indicted for the death of Iraqi civilian Ahmed Jabber Kareem, who drowned after being detained in Basra in May 2003 on suspicion of looting. Sergeant Carle Selman, two guardsmen and an unnamed lance corporal face a manslaughter charge and are alleged to have beaten up the suspected looters before throwing them in a canal, where Kareem drowned.


My only point is, if you think this is an "American Army" issue, I have to say that factually, that is sadly not the case. But I realize your ballot is specific, so my point is just that...a point.
by patch22us on Thu Jan 03, 08 2:28pm [+]

This strategy is as old as the earth...unfortunately men of military ages have always and will always be "caught" in the middle" of any armed conflict (regardless of their allegiances) and thus targeted...and possibly eliminated without much judicial consideration, or recrimination...
by thesoothsayer on Thu Jan 03, 08 4:47pm [+]

point taken patch. and i agree. but its yours this time. that shud give me a sense of satisfaction. but it really doesn`t.
by quirk99 on Thu Jan 03, 08 5:36pm [+]

Patch made a good point there.
by skylab on Thu Jan 03, 08 7:51pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved