user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : Yes Giggity.
And this is one of the cleaner bits of dirt on the guy.
Voted : No Giggity Giggity.
I don't think he did. But then, I'm thinking that I've got Cindy McCain at home, and don't need to troll for hamburger. But I'm not your normal man, so the possibility does exist.
Oh, I get it now. He is Republican and so, guilty.
Perhaps the Democrat-controlled Congress should call for an investigation ?
Shame, shame on the New York Times.
Voted : No Giggity Giggity.
I doubt it, unless he ate a whole bag of Viagra first.
Voted : Yes Giggity.
He was banging the woman who was to become his second wife before he dumped his first. Did he somehow find religion after that?
Voted : No Giggity Giggity.
No because he's gay.
I'm a Democrat and I'm disgusted that the New York Times printed that article when they had NO EVIDENCE to support it.
Until they have EVIDENCE it is just a rumor. This is TABLOID journalism. The New York Times has stooped to a new low. It is slowly losing it's much revered credibility.
The mentality behind this small town moron level. Just because two people spend a lot of time together, right away people are convinced SOMETHING IT GOING ON!
I've been victimized by this type of thinking myself. These people need to get a life instead of worrying about what other people do.
G-Man- 5+5, when all works to specs. And why aren't you on staff at the DNC?
Huh?
Voted : No Giggity Giggity.
I think this was a tongue in cheek comment: "why don't we let McCain testify under oath, too?" Am I right?
If not, then I could give a very dull and boring answer. Because the "other party" (ie, the lobbyist) likewise denies any such contact. So, it's a moot point. Unfortunately for Clinton, the "other parties" were all too willing to spill the beans, while "he" was meanwhile spilling another form of seed in things like blue dresses.
The "sources" for this tabloid type of innuendo have neither been confirmed, nor has any substantial evidence been produced. My vote isn't because I PERSONALLY think he didn't do it. It's because we consider any American innocent until proven guilty. It wasn't any of our business with Clinton, and it STILL isn't any of our BUSINESS.
^On the lighter side, maybe when this whole thing is said and done, Johnny can introduce Bill to some women who are a little more discreet. lol
Voted : Yes Giggity.
He...did...have...sexual...relations...with ...that...woman...
|
|
