IF HILARY BECOMES PRESIDENT, SHOULD BILL BE BANNED FROM THE WHITE HOUSE?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

political : IF HILARY BECOMES PRESIDENT, SHOULD BILL BE BANNED FROM THE WHITE HOUSE?

[+] serious ballot by LCD
ACTIVE Tue Apr 22, 08 - Wed Apr 22, 09
When Kim Il Sung died, Kim Jong il became the default leader for life.

Same with Fidel Castro, his brother Raul will be taking over.

Alberto Fujimori, before he was ousted, his wife ran against him.

of course we know what resulted from the 2 different Bushes running this country.

USA is supposed to be the example of free society without a hint of dictatorship.

If Hilary becomes president, how much would bill share the power of presidency?

He had his 8 years. He is out. Shouldn't he banned from the white house?

great idea, I support the ban
no, he get to be right there in the white house, extending family powers

Ballot #126015 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
123202. Who was the only president to be married in the White House?
121950. When Obama becomes the president, should we change the name "white house"?
115967. Which U.S. President once gambled away an entire set of White House china?
116103. First president to invite an African-American man to the White House?
53778. JOKE BALLOT: When he leaves the White House (assuming he ever does), what will GWBush do in his final week as president?
127390. Greetings from the White House
72598. Who is really in charge at the White House?
113104. Republicans...Who would you rather see in the White House?
3245. why does it have to be the ***WHITE HOUSE ***???? why cant it be the "BLACK HOUSE"?????????
14428. If Bill Clinton could run for President again, would you vote for him?

COMMENTS:
Chelsea next, in 2020!

by LCD on Tue Apr 22, 08 10:52pm [+]

Voted : great idea, I support the ban
NO MORE FAMILY DYNASTIES

by nuckinfutz on Tue Apr 22, 08 11:35pm [+]

Why? She obviously wears the pants(uit) in the family. I can think of far worse things than having two highly intelligent and capable people sharing White House duties. Like McCain or the weenie Obama.

Go Chelsea!!

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Wed Apr 23, 08 8:55am [+]

Voted : no, he get to be right there in the white house, extending family powers
Our founding fathers, in their wisdom fashioned the 2 term rule to prevent "dynastic leadership" did not take into consideration the new husband-wife "combo" loophole and too many people fail to see the downside of it which is very unfortunate... it's sad (that so many people) think there are only a couple families in this Country capable of leading this Nation.

by thesoothsayer on Wed Apr 23, 08 9:55am [+]

see ballot #123127

by thesoothsayer on Wed Apr 23, 08 9:56am [+]

"Our founding fathers, in their wisdom fashioned the 2 term rule to prevent "dynastic leadership"

That is incorrect. There was no limit in the constitution or elsewhere until after FDR when the 22nd amendment was enacted (which occurred in 1951). So until then you could serve as long as people kept electing you... hence FDR's 4 terms.

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Wed Apr 23, 08 3:00pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact