user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : she went on attacks while her opponent kept on the message
She doesn't keep a cool head.
" she is representing 50% of voters in this country who happens to be female,"
No. I'm not female and neither are many of her supporters and those who voted for her. Don't paint her as the "candidate for women". That isn't true, isn't accurate, etc.
Obama's negative ratings have steadily increased as people have learned more about him. What matters is how well the candidate scores in the election. You can be likable and lose.
She scores much better in the polls against McCain than Obama, especially in the battleground states.
* Florida: Clinton tops McCain 49 - 41 percent; McCain gets 44 percent to Obama's 43 percent;
* Ohio: Clinton beats McCain 48 - 38 percent; McCain gets 43 percent to Obama's 42 percent;
* Pennsylvania: Clinton tops McCain 51 - 37 percent; Obama leads McCain 47 - 38 percent.
Good luck winning the presidency without those states, Obama-maniacs.
Voted : She's liar, can't be trusted, shows bad judgement, is unstable, too much baggage
I believe she could have run a better campaign instead of assuming she was a shoe-in and then getting angry and going negative. There's a reason so many people are defecting from her camp but there will always be those who fail to see the "handwriting on the wall"...that's how we ended up with Bush. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time, and there are quite a few people who can see through the "smoke and mirrors." she already has a lot of people brainwashed on the experience issue. Being a First lady or a Senator doesn't mean you are better able to be a successful President. Even when she was first lady, she attempted to do the job (with Willie's "Permission") of others and failed. We don't need another White House out of control and run by individuals who would sell their soul(s) to contributors and special interests. there are a lot of parrots around here who spew that same old "she won this and she won that, the fact is she is losing and trying to do funny math won't change that fact. She lost more contests, she has less delegates, she has less superdelegates, she has less popular votes. Last time I checked the person with the least of these loses the election. If she runs a White house the way she ran this campaign we are all in trouble. I was routing for her in the begining, in spite of a lot of doubts, but she blew it.
Voted : She has "cankles"
I swear. I did NOT have sex with that woman. 
 
Voted : She never had it from the start.
I wouldn't vote Hillary for Dog Catcher.
That would be an insult to all Dog Catchers out there, I'm sorry.
Voted : she represented conservative side of the democratic party, and made herself look too much like Bush
When she started campaigning like a Republican, she went into attack mode, she lied through her teeth, she barely stayed on the issues that mattered to the American people (busy attacking Obama unprovoked) her supporters are not racially diversed, she exposed her true self (b*tch) she has a temper (hair line trigger tempet) and she gives the impression that she is entitled to the office of the Presidency.
BTW:Did I also mentioned that she is a b*tch? 
Oh give it a rest FiddleFAKER, if you believe for one moment those made up stats will hold up during the general election, you are as delusional as your chosen b*tch of a candidate...If those stats are presently accurate...
Another point (you know like the one on your head) She can't win the Black vote as well, so, she has problems from that group of voters, if it wasn't for her viciousness towards Obama, her BIG fat arse would not be in the voting position she presently is in...So you can take those stats and stick them where the sun don't shine...
The B*TCH LOST because she is all about divison, period, the same old political BS, so, out with old in with the new, let it be written, let it be done...So wipe your eyes and nose and get over it...
cake monster, They aren't made up stats. They are polls by reputable polling companies. BTW, while you drink some more Obama Kool-aid, remember that the last democrat to win the white house without carrying West Virgina was Woodrow Wilson in 1916. I'm sure his almos 40 point loss to Clinton portends good things for him in that state in the general election.
I'll point out for everyone AGAIN, your sexist comments (b*tch, big fat arse). Do you talk about women using those terms all the time?
BTW, those polls are representative in every way of the voter demographics in the general election - including race.
^ Again you genius, I only speak of your b*tch of a candidate that way, becasue she is a b*tch, see how that works?
As for your stats and the other b*tch lapDOGS supporters, Obama will not only win the nomination, he will win in the general election...I know you and the rest of the b*tch supporters hate hearing that, however, sometimes the truth hurts...
Now, your candidate will NOT win because she can not win the BLACK vote, her unprovoked attacks against Obama infuriated that pool of voters, mind you, she was in the begining winning those votes until that b*tch open that sore underneath her nose attacking him like a Republican...
You really make me laugh when you call me a bigot, sexist, racist, etc, etc, etc...I tell it like it needs to be told, you simply can not take the hard cold facts and when I give it to you like you need to receive it, I am accused of being those all three...
In my opinion, I am ahead of the game in my estimation, because you are a Israel kiss arse, no one can get any lower than that son...so, enjoy...
Voted : She never had it from the start.
"I wouldn't vote Hillary for Dog Catcher."
I second that.
Anyone who argues that she would make a better Democratic candidate than Obama is ignoring the fact that Obama has won most of the states, he has the popular vote, and he has more delegates. If people wanted her to be president and if she was more electable than Obama, she would've won the nomination. She obviously is not more electable since he leads her in ALL catagories.
Here are the polls as of this posting:
Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll:
McCain Leads Obama In Two Of Three Key Swing States. Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll Finds Clinton Has Big Leads In Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania
FLORIDA: Clinton 48 - McCain 41
McCain 45 - Obama 41
OHIO: Clinton 48 - McCain 41
McCain 44 - Obama 40:
PENNSYLVANIA: Clinton 50 - McCain 37
Obama 46 - McCain 40
Hillary WINS ALL THREE. Obama gets ONE.
He's actually doing worse than he was when I posted the last comment.
Voted : She doesn't know how to lose gracefully
Which makes me doubt her negotiation abilities.
|
|
