WOULD YOU WANT YOUR ENEMY TO HAVE NUKES?

=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

WOULD YOU WANT YOUR ENEMY TO HAVE NUKES?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

WOULD YOU WANT YOUR ENEMY TO HAVE NUKES?

[+] serious ballot by larrynelmira
ACTIVE Tue May 27, 08 - Wed May 27, 09
I can understand how people in Iran, North Korea or in any other country might say,

" You hypocrites, why is it okay for you and your friends to have but not us"

That is a great argument and they are correct, I can totally understand that point of view, if I lived in Iran I would feel the same way, but my question is this.

Given the choice, would you want those who are perceived to be your nations enemy, to have nuclear weapons?

That's what I'm asking , not that we are hypocrites and it's double standards, but would you want that?

No, I don't want our perceived enemies to have
yes because the balance of power makes it okay
I'm so vain , I think this ballot is about me
Yes, if our perceived allies have so should our perceived enemies

Ballot #126946 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
90048. An American servicemen comes across a wounded enemy combatant. The wounded enemy is no longer a threat to military or Iraqi civilians. What does the service member do with the wounded enemy?
110562. Once an enemy, always an enemy. Agree or disagree?
100045. Possible scenario? Iran nukes Israel; U.S. nukes Iran.
14384. please answer! could the us take over the world w/ no nukes?
92267. Tactical nukes -- still Nuclear War?
92268. Does using 'Tactical Nukes' mean it is not a Nuclear War?
67949. Why did North Korea admit to having nukes?
102613. Should Bush demand that Pakistan surrender its nukes?
111909. If terrorism and nukes didn't exist, would the Republican party?
65869. The enemy within

COMMENTS:
I don't want anyone to have nuclear weapons, if I had my way everyone of them on the planet would be dismantled, but I'm also realistic and know that is not going to happen in the near future

by larrynelmira on Tue May 27, 08 6:22am [+]

Wouldn't it be nice if nobody had any... isn't that what the non-profileration treaty was all about?

by justanother on Tue May 27, 08 7:12am [+]

^ Yeah , if nobody had any, including us. ^^

by larrynelmira on Tue May 27, 08 7:43am [+]

Voted : No, I don't want our perceived enemies to have
No, not that there's much that can be done about it.

by skylab on Tue May 27, 08 10:14am [+]

Voted : No, I don't want our perceived enemies to have
And we shouldn't have them either.

by nuckinfutz on Tue May 27, 08 1:05pm [+]

^ Yep

by larrynelmira on Tue May 27, 08 1:24pm [+]

No. It's common sense really.

But like you said, Larry, if no one had them, there wouldnt be that problem. But even if every country in the world promised to dismantle them, there will always be someone who decides to break that promise and have them secretly. That's why no one pays any attention to the non-proliferation treaty.

by Grumpy_Person on Tue May 27, 08 4:10pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact