user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Excuse my "excess" pasting...
Voted : I don't think it's a good idea
Flags on private property shouldn't be censored, but I don't think they're a good idea.
Voted : I'm okay with it
I don't have a problem with it.
Voted : I'm okay with it
I don't have a problem with it either. A lot of countries fly flags that were once flown in less than admirable times in their history. But one of the reasons why the confederate flag draws so much disdain is because a supremacist hate group hijacked it for their personal use. And I personally don't care to give them any credit for it by looking at it as a symbol of racism or supremacy. It's a historical flag. It needs to be taken back from those who have degraded it, IMO.
Voted : The South will rise again
yeah sure. swastikas are good idea too, sure Hitler did some bad stuff, but shouldn't we celebrate a glorious leader who gave the world the Volkswagen and AG Farben? Heil confederacy. just take over usa after I move to canada.
by LCD on Mon Aug 04, 08 10:15pm
[+]
Voted : First Amendment protects it, whether you like it or not.
The First Amendment protects such expressions, even controversial ones, especially on private property. There's not a damn thing anyone can do about, save buy up all the property next to the interstate and fly banners with Malcolm X's photo on them or, befitting the left, the old Soviet flag. If you don't like it, then by all means, move to Canada, where it would probably get shoehorned into one of the "hate speech" statutes and be banned outright in public. I rather like the First Amendment, whether or not I agree with what's being said or how it's being expressed, so long as it isn't violent. Personally, I don't have a problem with Confederate battle flags on private property or displayed at historically appropriate venues (e.g., Confederate cemeteries or memorials). The same flag does not belong on the grounds of state legislatures (i.e., as in South Carolina) or incorporated into state flags (e.g., as was once the case with Georgia).
There's nothing better than the First Amendment, nothing, ever. If you think an idea's repugnant, then you should have the moral courage to let it stand the test of public scrutiny. I don't need the government acting as my nanny to tell me what I should or shouldn't express publicly, so long as I am not directly inciting anyone to immediate violence against anyone else.
Of course, the real point of all this is: "With more planned in Tennessee, Georgia, Kentucky, and possibly South Carolina, the interstate show of force, experts say, highlights the potential backlash from banning nostalgic symbols from the public square." I've never flown a Confederate battle flag in my life, but I might actually donate money to one of these anachronistic groups, just to really enjoy seeing certain people who want to play nanny royally pissed off and unable to do anything about it.
Voted : I don't think it's a good idea
The memo regarding the actual outcome of the Civil War was never handed out south of the Mason-Dixon.
Voted : It's better if we just move on
Voted : It's better if we just move on
I believe it depends largely on whose "ox was gored", people unaffected one way or another (or those who seem to think of it as not having any relevance to their life now)seems not mind or they are mostly indifferent
|
|