ALEISTER CROWLEY, WICKEDEST MAN IN THE WORLD, OR COMPLETE GENIUS?

user ballots

what if : religion :

ALEISTER CROWLEY, WICKEDEST MAN IN THE WORLD, OR COMPLETE GENIUS?


[+] ballot by hinkhonkdonk
created Mon Jan 12, 04

The great victorian mage, created his own religion, pushed the boundaries of the human psyche, should we revere him, or berate him for his "satanic" cruel acts?

Yes, legend.
No, shouldnt have been messing with the unknown
Love is the law, Love under will
Inspired a generation
Complete bastard, burn the heretic
Druggy, ugly, misogynist shit.
A very minor evil. Irrelevent to history.
Insignificant poser.


Ballot #12914 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
71776. Wickedest Uncle
77110. Would you stuff an unwrapped Twinkie down the back of your pants and do the booty clap in front of CNN's Candy Crowley for $15?
91334. Every religion insists that its the only one, true religion. Isn't this proof that, best case scenario, all religions in the world except maybe one, are complete bullshit!
37197. Dr phil.... Baldy know it all or Genius?
74840. Is George W Bush a genius?
82331. Ayn Rand: kook or genius?
112683. Which of the following pop stars has a genius level IQ?
114465. Quiz. What is the plural of genius?
97526. What is the name for a person who is an idiot and genius at the same time?
105569. Is The Term "Polish Genius" An Oxymoron?


COMMENTS:
Why put satanic in "s. He was a satanist. He was also a liar, a drug addict and hated hisself for it. The Ordo Templis Orientis is not really a church but a group of black magicians fucking up the world.
by i_carnt_spel on Mon Jan 12, 04 10:44am [+]

For satanism, read LaVey, and the words druggy ugly misogynist shit do apply to him, crowley on the other hand was more of a philanthropist than anything, believing that power came from within, not from the dark force of satan,but misogynist? Plus in the Who's Who, you will find him listed as a mountaineer.
by hinkhonkdonk on Mon Jan 12, 04 11:17am [+]

He was a drug addict and could not form a meaningful relationship with a member of the opposite sex. He bragged to his acquaintances in London about how he could make himself invisible and proceeded to walk out of the cafe with a big shiny cloak on thinking nobody could see him. He was a dick. Philanthropist? Mountaineer? Don't think so.
by i_carnt_spel on Tue Jan 13, 04 3:43am [+]

He was no angel, but that shouldn';t detract from the point that he made a big contribution to religion.
by dark_willow1981 on Fri Jan 16, 04 4:52am [+]

burn_all_witches:
he wasn't evil.... but burning people because you don't share their beliefs is.
by dark_willow1981 on Tue Jan 20, 04 4:57pm [+]

morons, your name is so appropiate... back off christian-poo :p
by Dark_Willow1981 on Fri Jan 23, 04 1:41pm [+]

sorry, just realised my ID didn't come up there

dark willow
by Dark_Willow1981 on Fri Jan 23, 04 1:45pm [+]

93/23
by WorldPeaceTwinkie on Sat Jan 24, 04 8:41am [+]

sadly Crowley seems to be losing, but to have such strong views made about him surely makes him anything other than an insignificant poser, and to reply to i_carnt_spells accusations, Crowely indeed was a philanthropist, not a satanist, he was one of the first western students of buddism, as well as the first to conquer K2 and Kanchenjunga, and for the christians, was it little wonder he was so enticed by other cultures and ideas having been brought up as part of the Plymouth Brethren?
by hinkhonkdonk on Wed Feb 04, 04 4:21pm [+]

Crowley never killed anyone or did anything much of interest. He was mainly called "the wickedest man in the world" becuase he engaged in strange rituals and liked to hump men. He was a harmless little nutcase.
by SomeGuy on Thu Feb 05, 04 1:22pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved