search this site: search the web:
100% User contributed and administered website.

ONLY HUMANE OPTION?

user ballots

ONLY HUMANE OPTION?


[+] serious ballot by LCD
ACTIVE Thu Aug 21, 08 - Fri Aug 21, 09

we euthanize animals who are terminally ill or injured, because that's humane.

we don't do that to humans.

why aren't we being humane to humans? shouldn't we treat human beings better than animals?

yes, let's euthanize humans.
no, euthanization is never "humane"
we should only euthanize veteranians who euthanize.
Depends


Ballot #129557 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
93629. Why won't the Humane Society let me have any more kittens?!
50905. Animal Euthanasia : Humane or Just Cruel?
95746. According to the Humane Society, Ohio's cat population has dwindled 25% since 1980 (the year I was born). Why is that?
165. Shall I add multiple vote option?
48338. Should there be an option to add pictures to your questions at B&W?
73241. Which color option do you usually pick for your B&W ballots?
122133. Should we have the option to down-rate people that answer...
130855. Where is the Ballot SEARCH option Damit??
94588. In creating a ballot, should the "yes/no" option be moved from the "type" category to the "question" one?
70379. Other than rape/incest and a mothers health,can you think of any legitimate reason for a woman to have an abortion, considering adoption is an option?


COMMENTS:
Voted : no, euthanization is never "humane"
We euthanize animals because we (or insurance companies) cannot or will not spend the kind of money we would spend to at least TRY to soothe a human's pain. It's a quick way to get rid of a "problem".
by forgetmenot on Thu Aug 21, 08 8:19pm [+]

Voted : Depends
I think if an individual is terminally ill and wants to go out with some dignity, then I don't see anything wrong with that. The Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, etc don't see anything wrong with that either.

With animals, sometimes we have to be the judge; and unfortunately the executioner if nothing else can be done. Otherwise it's just plain wrong.
by Mr_Spleen on Thu Aug 21, 08 9:22pm [+]

"we should only euthanize veteranians who euthanize.
by Mr_Spleen on Thu Aug 21, 08 9:23pm [+]

^Technically that wouldn't be euthanasia.
by Mr_Spleen on Thu Aug 21, 08 9:24pm [+]

It might be humane to do so, LCD, but I'm waiting for the moment when someone, believing that someone, who's terminally ill and believing that he/she has no hope, decides to take this option, only to have the cure for what they were dying of come in the door a day later...

I've been dead, and I've had a doctor tell me that I was on the doorstep a dozen years ago. Where there's life, there's hope...
by Truthseeker013 on Fri Aug 22, 08 6:25am [+]

Voted : Depends
Only with careful controls to avoid abuse, like a living will.
by skylab on Fri Aug 22, 08 6:58am [+]

The argument goes like this.

If we start killing humans, who decides which ones get killed and for what reasons.

First they start with defective people, then old, ugly people, then ethnic people, then poor people, then unemployed people, then people who don't believe in God, then people who don't pledge alliegence to the flag.

So once it because acceptable to to kill poeple for "this" reason, it will naturally progress to "other" reasons which are even LESS justifiable.

It will de-evolve into Genocide!
by Grapost on Fri Aug 22, 08 12:35pm [+]

Voted : Depends
what skylab said
by mojo on Fri Aug 22, 08 2:12pm [+]

^^Grapost, yours was a very good comment. I beieve what you said could very well happen if euthenasia became a regular practice.
by forgetmenot on Fri Aug 22, 08 9:28pm [+]

Voted : Depends
Only if there is absolutely no hope (someone on deaths door for instance who is undergoing chronic and extreme pain). And the decision to do so cannot be made by anyone other than the one about to die. But even then there's the possibility of it's practice 'hardening' people to the point of it being socially acceptable. After a while, it would become the norm to put 97 year old granny down because she has alzeimers and does nothing but sleep all day.
by Grumpy_Person on Fri Aug 22, 08 11:33pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved