|
|
COMMENTS:
Voted : Philosophy sucks!
But just so you know, I'm NOT an organ donor. I read the book, Coma. Nuff said.
Voted : They can wait until I'm done with them
I'm an organ donor, but they'll have to wait.
Voted : Comment:
I don't know which of the above four to select, so I will just leave this comment: I am NOT an organ donor because when I went to get my driver license, the attendant told me NOT to be a donor because she has heard the people who take the organs say that some of the crash victims are not always dead and could have survived but they had their "orders" to retrieve organs.
Voted : Comment:
In the latter case, I wouldn't have to decide that conundrum one way or the other, because I would either disarm the gunman or die trying. As for the former, NO. Can't condone taking a life anymore.
Voted : Comment:
The first option requires the murder of Bill absent duress or threat as a driving force, rather a conscious choice of the perpetraitor. Where as the second and third options are preformed ad hoc, as necessatated for the case at hand and not a broad rule. Is it Bill's responsibility to save the diseased or misfortunate? Morally, the life of the individual to be sacraficed is equally valued as those who would benefit from his organs. To take one innocent life for the sake of saving a few others (or the entire populace) is wrong ('cept for a willingness from Bill). The whole idea is proposterous and equivocal to a HJitler mentality.
|
|