search this site: search the web:

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS PROOF THAT A LIQUID ACCELERANT WAS USED AS PROOF OF ARSON?

quiz : crime :

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS PROOF THAT A LIQUID ACCELERANT WAS USED AS PROOF OF ARSON?


[+] ballot by skylab
ACTIVE Wed Oct 28, 09 - Thu Oct 28, 10

I read about a real life crime, and found out that local arson investigators often make assumptions that scientific tests prove to be false, according to top arson investigators such as Hurst and Breyer. All of the following are widely thought to be proof of arson, but only one was verified by the scientific method. Which one is it?

Brown spots are caused by an accelerant.
Crazed or cracked glass is caused by an accelerant.
Only an accelerant fire can melt aluminum.
Pour and puddle floor patterns are proof that an accelerant was used.
A V-shaped pattern is proof that an accelerant was used.
A lab test on materials from the fire can prove an accelerant.

Ballot #135083 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
28988. PROOF THAT GOD EXIST! Tell me what do you think!
102766. Do you have any proof that 9/11 was a conspiracy?
38345. Proof that God DOESN'T exist.
64355. So we all have the proof Lib_Dem is a racist ...
64642. Fox News - Proof By Ignorance
73342. [J] Proof that we give the elderly too much?
99404. Can you give me proof that what happend on 9/11 was not what it seems?
101116. Proof that the WTC was hit by USAF bombers
102442. The paradigm of proof through questions alone.
105429. MORE DEVASTATING PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!




whatisit? - smilesheet - quick ref. - hel.lo v.0.01

COMMENTS:
Comments are hidden for Quiz ballots.
There are 11 votes so far. The answer will be shown after 10 votes.
Vote and go to result page for the comments.




About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2002-2009 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved