user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
All nations except USA. all other nations are just too UNSTABLE.
Idiotic comments always remind me why I restricted ballot choice entry.
France and UK are not unstable.....no one should have them, every country has crazy people, to much destruction for so few to decide everyones fate
by ABC on Mon Feb 02, 04 11:58am
[+]
Israel should not be allowed nuclear weapons. Israel is a rogue nation and one day they will turn on the USA.
France is very unstable-they can't even find anyone who want to govern them.. North Korea is Worst. They claim thay have nothing to lose. If the Rapture doesn't happen first..when the Nukes start flying we're all going home to our determined places. thank God I'm a Christian.
How is "being a christian" going to help? You aren't the sort of deluded religious fundamentalist that believes there is only one true religion are you?
North korea, all north koreans are brain washed to beleeve that everyone is out to get them, they even think that they didnt stark the korean war, with people who feel and think like that with nukes, its time to moove to a desert island
I agree that Us,Russia, Britain, France, India, Pakistan,N Korea and China should keep their nukes. "israel" IS arogue state and as such must be disarmed. IAEA must keep nukes out of Iran and Saudi. Yes the US will continue to be a global bully, but they are run by madmen, and to try to disarm them would lead to Apocalypse. What we need is a return to a 2- or 3 superpower world, and a return of the proven- effective doctrine known as Mutually- Assured_destruction. As we speak, Russia is conducting a full scale mock-up of nuclear war against USA. If Russia, or China, for that matter, would show some balls, and re-enter the nuke-threat theatre, the States would be forced to reconsider it's behaviour on the World stage. Look at N Korea, the States bluster and blow, but know they can't do anything about it, because it would mean the end of the world. Certainly not a perfect solution, but likely the best we'll come across.
none nukes keep balance that basically says u fuck with me too much and i'll set off a reaction that'll kill us all.
USE don't bully anyone-we stand up to other countrys and defend our selves and Isreal. Just like i don't start fights. but I will finnish one.
What are your thoughts on M.A.D.? Gayman? Would you agree it would make the world safer? What about a pact that if 1 country nukes another, all other nuclear countries would be obligated to unleash their arsenals on the aggressor?
"Just like i don't start fights. but I will finnish one." Is it just me or does anyone else find it really funny when a gay tries to sound tough?
For the discussion, I think North Korea should be stripped of their weapons. Their leader is certifiably insane and has an intense hatred for his neighbours. I can't see any of the other nations using their weapons unless they were provoked.
Vey good ballet the Truth, i would have to choose choice 11, the removal of nukes from unstable nations that are also in a fued with another nation, that would be India and Pakistan who are fueding with each other, Isreal who are going to start world war 3 in my mind, and have tons of conflicts with everyone. Russia because they have no security to protect the weapons and N.Korea which is just plain mad. The others can keep there Nukes, i truly think that the U.S. has a true understanding of there power and will not use them and either will the others who are not on my list. But in a perfect world there would be no weapons and hate, oh well that's life.
If you don't know why Israel has nukes then you should study the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The collective might of 9 Arab states, with Soviet arms and "advisors" attacked Israel - a country no bigger than New Jersey on the holiest day of Judaism - Yom Kippur. They knew the defenses would be down and they went for the jugular.
If the Arabs had slaughtered the Jews in Israel we would all be responsible for that attrocity. I know most of you MONSTERS don't value the life of a Jew but I do and many good Christians (and others) do. I care about all human life and the fact that the U.N. is controlled by 1 Billion Arabs vs. 13 Million Jews is pretty evident.
So who is willing to defend these people? Or should we just let them be killed off by the Arabs? How about if we let you and your family be killed off by whatever race hates yours? I'm sure the world would keep turning without you. So what is your justification for having an army with dangerous weapons to protect you?
Furthermore, the fact that some of you voted for China instead of the U.S. shows you have no humanity and are pretty much as selfish as an animal. Don't you care about their appaulling human rights? Don't you care that they ran over college kids with tanks durring a peaceful protest? Should a government the people don't want be rulling them? If you are on this site from a free country and you are ignoring the oppression of fredom than do you deserve the sacrafice others have made to give you freedom?
If you believe the French should have nukes you should know they are the most hypocritical nation on Earth. They blew up the Rainbow Warrior with peaceful protestors inside of it using military personnel and weapons. They regularly execute people when torture does not work even to this day. Look at waht they did in Algeria and read the history of the F.L.M. They tortured and killed female operatives (yes, they were terrorists) without a trial - many of them. France also had a large hand in proping up Saddam's government so it is no wonder they were unhappy to see him go. The fact that Saddam gassed entire villages with chemicals so vile that they actually change the genetic structure of your cells was of no consequence to France.
And don't try to justify bad behaviour with more bad behaviour. Yes there are many dictators and many murderers. Should we let a known murderer escape because there are too many of them to deal with? You do the best you can to make the world as just as possible.
The U.S. is not a bully otherwise we would dissolve the U.N. Why should we give a damn about what the rest of the world thinks? Because we do, that's why. That DOES NOT mean we are going to do what someone else wants if it is not in our best interest, but it does mean we are willing to reason and if there is a better solution than us handling, then I think most Americans would go for that.
Who protects the people being forced into canabalization in the Congo? Since the U.S. hasn't stepped in none of you selfish pussies are gonna do anything about it and these remote villages continue to get attacked by tribes of men with machettes and people are being forced to eat one another for the entertainment of the fighters. Children being forced to eat their own siblings at gunpoint! What evil asshole can even think of such a thing? Maybe we should send YOUR FAMILY to the Congo? Or do you not like the idea of your children tasting human flesh?
Why don't you do something about the evil in the world or SHUT UP about the U.S.???
"the fact that some of you voted for China instead of the U.S. shows you have no humanity" - This was a type-o. I ment to say voted for the U.S. instead of China.
Seems to me most of you jusy hate the U.S. cuz it is bigger and stronger and you are afraid. Well the U.S. is not omnipotent and if YOU acted right the U.S. wouldn't dominate the world. America has a policy of attraction rather than compulsion and therefore reasonable, smart, loving people live here. Not all Americans are greedy and selfish.
Why doesn't the EU match our contribution of aid to the world? They spend too much time pointing fingers and not enough time finding answers.
Without America we are all fucked.
First of all webjedi, there is a reason that the arab nations attacked occupied palestine. The nation was stolen from arabs by the UN and the TERRORIST GROUPS Haganah, and the Stern gang. They then proceeded to turn the owners of the land into displaced persons, and raze their homes. To this day, palis are denied the vote in their own land, denied adequate water, food and employment. Their children are murdered daily. It's not that I don't value the life of a Jew.;it's just that I don't value it over any other life. 3x as many unarmed palis are killed as jews. If "israel" was serious about peace, they would stop expansion outside of 1967 borders, and tear down the ghetto-wall. Jews sure learned alot about subjugation from their Nazi mentors. "israel" is the biggest threat to world peace in the modern world. BTW the French blew up the Rainbow Warrior in port when it was supposed to be empty. A photographer had gone on board to get some equipment, and died in the sinking. It was NOT intentional. If you are going to cite examples, at least TELL THE TRUTH!
Check out my poll Nuclear...What do you think? in newest section. I have an idea about nuclear- stability
ApplePie, what country are you from? The US hasn't done nearly as much "evil" as many countries. Have you taken any history classes? Do you know anything about Russia? Britain? Germany? China? France? Italy?ANY middle-eastern countries? Any latin countries? Any African countries? If you did, perhaps you would realize that you're talking out of your ass and you might possibly plug it.
By the way ApplePie I don't watch any 'Fox' News - I read different news sources from different countries and then form my own opinions which is obviously more than can be said about some of you dolts.
Israel should be completely disarmed.
"the French blew up the Rainbow Warrior in port when it was supposed to be empty."
It was a GREENPEACE boat - you are not suppossed to blow up Greenpeace boats wether people are on it or not. Besides, do you own a boat? Do you know what it takes to maintain a boat? When you have a large boat like that people are ALWAYS on board do one thing or another. The French knew there could have been people on board - they didn't care.
"occupied palestine... was stolen from arabs by the UN"
Who stole it from the Jews. Or did the Jews come from your ass? They came from the Middle East and Arabs thought, "hey, they are weak, let's take their land and exile them to Babylon."
Those who were left have been in Zfat and other areas of the Galilee for 4,000 years straight - 2,500 years longer than Islam has existed. 4000 years is longer than 2500 - or didn't they teach you that in your 3rd world grade school?
So doesn't that make it that the Jews are stealing it back from the Arabs? Considering the Arabs want to destroy any non-Muslims GOOD!
You know the Arabs want to conquer the world with Islam, or should I start reciting the Qu'ran?
north korea there very similar to hitler and could strike if they get real pissed at other nations
"The USA let the technology of the nuke fall into Russian hands... I'd call that pretty iresponsible "
I suppose you could have stopped it?
i think china deserve nuclear weapons, and north koria need to keep defended agaisnt amercia.
No middle eastern or Asian Country should have weapons of any kind. All the Asian countries are or at one were time communist, and the middle eastern countries are just full of wacked out religous nuts.
pa! america stable lol
Webjedi, according to your rationale, the Cree or Sioux or whatever should be able to come bulldoze your house( I assume your a yank), deny you democratic process, deny adequate water supplies, shoot your children for throwing rocks,etc. Would that be fair? You jews sure learned alot from your Nazi mentors. I'm no fan of fanatical Islam, but Zionism is the mirror image( God says we're better, so we'll kill who we want. "israel" is the biggest threat to world peace today, and as such must be disarmed. I really wouldnt mind the US keeping theirs if they got a clue and dumped "israel".The lives of a couple million religious fanatics are not worth the sacrifice of the whole of humanity. There is no difference, philisophically between the butcher Sharon and the butcher bin Laden. If "israel" has nukes, then Syria should have them too. M.A.D. is the only way to go. (and you're right, NO ONE should scuttle a Greenpeace ship.) But then, no-one should attack an American ship in order to blame it on Arabs, so everyone makes mistakes, no?
Definitely the Israeli state. It's the number 1 threat to world peace.
"The USA let the technology of the nuke fall into Russian hands... I'd call that pretty irresponsible."
Pretty irresponsible having "Jews" running the nuclear weapons program in the first place. Blame it on the Rosenbergs.
"There is no difference, philisophically between the butcher Sharon and the butcher bin Laden." If that is true then wouldn't Israel just use its fucking nukes already? It would certainly solve ALOT of problems all at one time. Comparing the head of a democratic state to a terrorist interested only in destruction and killing is pretty stupid. You are an idiot and you know nothing about freedom and democracy.
I'm not Jewsih, but I am definitely a Zionist. Why? Because they had their land stolen from them, the world tried to kill them, they achieved a 2,000 yr dream to return to their land, and they built it up to be a democracy - not a religious state. They have acted as responsibly as any democracy with their technology and for that they get my respect. If you are a dumbfuck Jew-hater like that pussy Revisionist then there is nothing anyone is going to say to change your mind. If you open your mind you will see that the Jews are important to all of humanity.
And yes, if I were an American Indian I would be right to come and bulldoze my house (mine in particular). I think what we did to them in this country sucks shit and we will one day be very sorry for it. For fuck sake, the name of our football team here in the capital of the United States is the Redskins! Is that racist or what?
WebJedi, the UK is the world's largest giver of aid to the third world as a percentage of our Gross National Product.
Really? I thought that was Sweden, but I guess it depends on how you ocunt the numbers. In any case, you may have an excellent percentage, but that is not the point. The point is you take away all the money the US gives and it is going to equal a total sum that the rest of the world couldn't match. Point is: the USA is the biggest supplier of charity in the world. If we didn't have nukes to defend ourselves that charity would be gone. Hence, if you give a fuck about humanity then don't take away the ability of the largest donor to supply the donations.
However, it is obvious to me that the vast majority of the people on this poll would rather live under Chinease rule then democracy. You people must be pretty dumb.
Iraq. oh no they don't have ANYTHING anymore do they don't trust any goverment most of the pouplation don't vote anyway tht on haer
A democracy, eh? So tell me, then, who did the Palis vote for in the last Knesset elections? You are either rretarded or you are a liar. And you don't seem to be retarded.
I thin the world would be safest if EVERY country had an equal nuclear capacity. It was MAD that kept the americans and russians from wiping eachother out, so a similar system on a global scale seems the safest bet as long as there are ppl as unstable and crazy as the yanks around.
NEATHER ONe!!!
Israel should not be allowed any nuclear weapons.. they are bullies.. the territory should revert to the Arabs the rightful the Godly owners.. Allah is insulted and Islam is stabbed in the back..
The UK is the only one that can be trusted
no country should have nukes!
nuclear weopons should all be destroyed! All countries should unite with no strong government and help save earth from sheer destruction!
Nuclear weapons should be forever be banned to all countries...
"And yes, if I were an American Indian I would be right to come and bulldoze my house (mine in particular). I think what we did to them in this country sucks shit and we will one day be very sorry for it. For fuck sake, the name of our football team here in the capital of the United States is the Redskins! Is that racist or what?"
Why should I (or anyone) care if you bulldoze your own house, Jedi? The experience of the American Indian is hardly different than the Palestinians today. It is no wonder this fucked-up country supports the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians.
Flagrantviolater is right on. Webjedi is a liar. And in order to be a hater one must first be a liar. The truth harms no one.
More like which countries should BE allowed to have them. I say the US and UK keep theirs. Give Chinas to Taiwan, give Pakistans to Poland, Give Frances to Australia, Give Russias to the Netherlands, & give Indias to Spain. Problem solved.
Christianity is the truth, truthboy. I'd much rather believe in Christianity that to live in uncertainty.
you are all wrong!
america has no nuclear weapons!
america has nucular weapons! those are redneck nuclear weapons!
John_$%^&*$%^*@& or whatever it is, you rambled out an incoherent bunch of nonsense accusations with no facts. It sure is easy to appeal to the masses isn't it? Well all you assholes who want to destroy America and democracy deserve what you get.
"and on top of all of that it wants to impose domacracy on other countries-that in its self is not domacratic"
Yes, that's right, I want to impose 'domocracy' upon all people: the right to be FREE. How can you justify a dictator or a Monarch ruling people who have no say in their own lives? You want people to be slaves? Which people? Not you, right? You wouldn't like to be a slave would you? Neither would I, so fuck you and your liar accusations too.
I didn't lie about anything. Fuck you.
"you watch too much american media like CNN that only shows you 6 or 7 israelis that dead every 2 or 3 months"
Don't try to equate my statements with your lies. Fuck you. You throw accusations out there like nothing, I back up my statements with reason and inferences. Fuck you. You want to kill innocent men, women, and children who are living their lives under threat of death. Fuck you.
If you have real evidence or want to have real evidence presented fine, but I am not going to answer your pitiful attempt at slander. And fuck you again, thanks.
Read my posts on the rest of the site. I have already answered most of your questions in other places.
I ALSO think the facts speak for themselves.
If I were Israel I would have used those weapons by now to make it clear. The deterant factor does not seem to be working.
The fact that they have not? Yes, I think it speaks for itself. Yes, I very much think it does.
The USA having the greatest economic strength are probably the least likely to use, no wait, even I don't believe this shit. Israel would be my choice though living as they believe in a region infested with uncivilised barbarians they feel the most under siege and their panic switch would probably flick the quickest, yes even quicker than the country that almost descended into chaos when they saw a tit at the superbowl.
by OJD on Tue Feb 10, 04 10:50am
[+]
I think Canada should take all the nukes.. then we could drop them all on everyone else. Afterwards, we could rebuild the world and create the long dreamed of 'Global Canadian' society.
With Americans electing people like Bush, I don't think the US government is responsible enough to have them.
The Frogs should not be allowed to have nukes.
The United States sould not be allowed to have Nuclear Weapons due to the fact they will attack a innocent nation on any given day
every1 as it is 2 risky 2 hav that many nukes in the world if there is a computor falt it cud launch al the nukes and we wud all be doomed
The people have spoken.
Every One But USA!!!!
by JMan on Mon Mar 29, 04 1:07am
[+]
Every One But USA!!!!
by JMan on Mon Mar 29, 04 1:07am
[+]
Letting Jews have Nukes is the same as letting Satan have Nukes
Hands up who's used them?
All of them should have them taken away. As long as any country has them, there is less inclination to act as a Global Citizen and a greater possibility that they will be used.
I would not have said US ... until Bush announced his desire for research for low-level tactical nukes. Semantics and irresponsibility are a bad combination.
|
|
