user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Thought, of course. Many (probably most) animals are capable of some type of thought.
yep. because if you didn't think, how could you invent language in the first place? One thing that's interesting, though, is how it would be to think w/o words. We're so used to words, it's almost inconcievable to think without them.
Thinking would be clearer if you thought in pictures. A picture is worth thousands of bits of information, words are more specific.
Fuck knows
I agree with sickofyourlies. Thoughts must've been pictures. When humans learned to speak, they gained a "thoughtvoice". That brings up another interesting thing. Where does the "thoughtvoice" come from? We're not actually speaking, so how DO we think in words. I believe that this is something science should look into.
Who invented human language. And what did the oldest language sound like? And did all (or most) modern languages come from them? My theory: the original language sounded like a cross between Arabic and one of the Caucasian languages (like Georgian) - lots of exotic consonants.
|
|