user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
I'd join them.
Behind every great fortune, there is a crime.
I am all for it, the rich have been steling from me all my life
by ABC on Thu May 27, 04 1:39pm
[+]
you said it, ABC
by mojo on Thu May 27, 04 2:23pm
[+]
Hmm, considering you have access to a computer and the free time to spend on this website I'd say you're pretty well off. Maybe not compared to bill gates, but certainly when compared to the majority of the worlds population. Perhaps someone should steal all of your belongs and give them to a more deserving 3rd worlder. After all, if you aren't starving then you're rich to most people.
Stealing from the rich and giving to the poor doesn't sound so good now does it? All of you leftists in this country constantly bemoaning the 'evil rich' fail to take into account that they are themselves quite wealthy.
Unless the rich person got wealthy by actually physically stealing the money, he is entitled to keep what he owns, just as you are. Theft is theft, no matter how much you dislike the victim.
I think Jinn's meaning of "rich" was clearly not meant to be from a poor persons perspective as Herzog tried to spin it into.
Anyway, I would be against the stealing because some of those rich people had to bust their ass to get that money while some poor people are just too lazy to get a job and therefore should not get crap for free. If Kenneth Lay was robbed, I couldnt care less, but if they are stealing from "the rich" unknowing of how their fortune came to be or what is intended to be done with it then I would be against it.
Thank you duckhead. Funny how some people think discriminate against the creators of certain ballots, as if they have some sinister motive or intention for posting them.
Id support them entirely
And in fact was on the verge of starting a group to do just that when I was around 20.We didnt actually have to but were motivated entirely by altuistic reasons.We were against the Highway Man tactic of just robbing people generally.We were going to go after specific institutions.Part of it was going to be direct sabotage in a political war sense but the other was to steal masses of moolah to directly fund allternative systems .Food distribution, alternative technologies, etc to give dirctly to the poor and generally wage Michael Collins Guerilla warfare against a system that has openly declared extermination of "alternative" peoples and groups.Margaret Thatcher and The Travelers for example.
World War 3 is currently being waged and it is defined by robin Hood/Zapatista style geurilla Warfare which increasingly has the support of general populations in every country in the world.
I would be against it. Most rich people have worked extremely hard to get where they are, and most poor people have dropped out of school and spent their time smoking weed instead of getting a damn job
I agree with Preparation_H on this one.Poor people are poor only because they are lazy at least here in the States.start breeding at the age of 14 and have 7 kids by 24.What the fuck.I refuse to pay their food stump.Send them to labour camp and put the bastards up for adaption
im a poor student an my folks have refused to support me anymore cld u jus steal frm them an giv it to me
|
|
