COMMENTS:
Does kerry have a definate stance on anything? Except that he's not bush, he's been pretty firm on that one.
Kerry is an intellectual unlike Bush. This means that Kerry can comprehend complex information, judge the merits of all factors of an issue, then revise his solution if need be based on new data. Bush on the other hand is what we call "uncurious". He has a very low base of knowledge and intelligence. This means that he cannot sift though and interconnect varoius bits of information to supply a cognizant answer. People like Bush thus have to resort to "beliefs" and the unambigious. Everything is black and white. Bush does not change his mind even when the mountains of data prove he is wrong. This is the most dangerous type of person to hold public office. Ignorance leads to fear, insecurity, hate, and fanaticism. ..So to answer your question herzog, Kerry does stand for something... It's called intelligence.
thats not much to stand for, couch. If it depended on intelligence, there would've been a much different lineup of presidents back then.
thats not much to stand for, couch. If it depended on intelligence, there would've been a much different lineup of presidents back then.
YES. i want Bush out more than anything in the whole world right now.
Bush is a bastard, a murdering bastard, and he has to GO. i don't care what John Kerry does. i really don't care what his views are. i just want BUSH OUT.
A vote for Kerry is certainly not making an ideological statement. The man waffles more than IHOP. If you look back at our recent presidents, good or bad, at least most of them stood for something:
Kennedy- lower taxes, aggressive stance on Communism
LBJ- tough on commies, Civil Rights legislation
Nixon- China
Reagan- tax cuts, Soviet resistance
GWBush- establish democracy in Middle East
Notice I left out Ford, Carter, GHWBush and Clinton. None of their presidencies adopted any ideological vision for the future. Some of this was the result of historical circumstance, but most of it was just their personalities and policies. I see Kerry being another Clinton at best, and potentially another Carter at worst.
Long-time CIA “asset” installed as interim Iraqi prime minister
in a search engine
Kerry is actually too libearl for me, but anything is better than Bush. It pains me though to see Kerry touting the pro Israel agenda.
Dean for America
If you look at the results of this, Bush is either going to lose really badly in November, or most republicans are too stupid to work out how to use a computer. Interesting...
Quote: 'Israel and Palistine have not made the headlines in the US for quite some time'.
That is because you Americans don't care about what happens in the rest of the world, do you even know where Palestine is? My friend went to America recently and she had to go on the internet just to find out the news from the rest of the world, because all she could get was that FOX crap cheerleading Bush.
Bush sucks.
I voted for Edwards in the primary, wasn't big on Kerry, but Bush is an immorale ahole.
BOTH REASONS!
by Czar on Tue Nov 02, 04 5:01pm
[+]
|
