search this site: search the web:
What, would you rather work? Blow off steam and relax. Lower GDP. play on Bestandworst.com!

USA INTERVENTION IN IRAQ. A DIFFERENT VIEW.

user ballots

choices : political :

USA INTERVENTION IN IRAQ. A DIFFERENT VIEW.


[+] serious ballot by johan_moritz
created Wed Jun 23, 04

I am a romanian and my country "had" almost 45 years of communism. Right after WWII, people believed USA will come and liberate us from communists. People died fighting in the mountains against against communists, while waiting for the americans to come ( I am proud to say that we were the only easteuropeans to organise a resistance against communism; many of the people who fought the soviets on the easter front just couldn't accept to let communists take over the country). But americans didn't come and so we had 45 years of pain and unimaginable distruction. I don't know if we will ever recover after this. I REGRET AMERICANS DIDN'T INVADE MY COUNTRY. Of course, people would've died, innocent people. But in the end people were killed too, innocent people, good people. We kiled eachother: communists against the others.
So, I am tihnking the american intervention in Iraq, no matter what the real causes are, is bad for the country? Are those who regret Saddam, or shot at US soldiers, the "real" iraqis? Do they represent Iraq? Or those people who peed on Saddam's photos and welcomed the US troops?

the US intervention is good for Iraq (in the end)
US intervention is immoral
US intervention is immoral, imperialist, colonial


Ballot #38962 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
104750. What does "winning in Iraq" mean, from an American point of view?
78046. Jane Fonda is 'coming out' against Iraq war. How do you view her decision?
100942. Ocean View shack or Desert view mansion?
68988. Were these improvments caused by US military intervention, or massive coincidence?
130491. Should genuine conservatives oppose government intervention in the economy
100456. What is your view of the Bible?
102472. Your view of Wicca
102475. What do you think about pay-per-view executions?
114312. Who would you like to see replace the big fat pig on the view?
35589. What kind of View do you have from your House?


COMMENTS:
It was time we heard from this perspective. Great poll.
by dccruzer5 on Wed Jun 23, 04 10:32am [+]

You will find that the people such a myself who were anti war, were nether pro Saddam, and undoubtedly the Iraqy people are, sorry, will be, better off in the future, so long as things stabilise. However I also felt that there were other methods that didn't involve such a degree of death and destruction.

The way it was carried out was immoral, the lies, the hypocracy and the underlying actual reasons. but the end result will ultimately beneficial. I do personally believe that it will remain a country dogged by terrorism for the foreseeable future.

The terrorists do not represent the majority of the iraqy people. They do however are symbolic of general sentiment and hatred of the overall Arab world. Something which we should be addressing. NOT getting side tracked with Saddam, who as was announced recently had very little to do with terrorism, with respects to Al Quada.
by wolf_nipple_chips on Wed Jun 23, 04 11:08am [+]

'However I also felt that there were other methods that didn't involve such a degree of death and destruction. '

Such as? Politely asking saddam to step down, and replace the baathist party dictatorship with a free democracy? More sanctions that would simply be ignored by our 'allies' in europe? Perhaps divine intervention?
No seriously, I'd like to hear how you'd remove saddam and his thugs from power without loss of life.
by herzog on Wed Jun 23, 04 12:54pm [+]

"The terrorists do not represent the majority of the iraqy people. They do however are symbolic of general sentiment and hatred of the overall Arab world. Something which we should be addressing. NOT getting side tracked with Saddam" -WNC

Agree with every sentence but the last. The terrorists do not represent the country...they are mainly shadow organizations for the ruling Islamic kingdoms in the middle East. Let's not forget that al Qaeda was tolerated and even funded by many nations before 9/11. The fundamentalists have been building their power base since WWII. The fundamentalist strongly believe in Islamic rule (sharia) indoctrinated in the Quran. They want all Muslim countries to be ruled in this fashion. Many Muslims immigrate and secular countries with no intention of assimilation because they share these beliefs.

Saddam was the best target to stop the oppression of the fundamentalists...because he was a secular ruler and an avowed enemy of the U.S. and to a lesser extent, sharia law in the Middle East. Plus he was an evil murderer. Attacking Iraq allows the U.S. to begin the battle for the hearts and minds of Muslims by establishing democracy in an already rich country, strategically located, and full of an educated populace. It was the best mix to make for a relatively-quick successful democracy. Why do you think Syrian, Iranian, Yemeni and Saudi terrorists are descending on Iraq? Because they know that their citizens will demand democracy when they see their Arab brothers adopt free markets and secularism in Iraq. This is a 20-50 year project and we'll win because democracy is the most lucrative and appealing form of government. It beats fundamentalist oppression any day.
by supposablethumbs on Thu Jun 24, 04 12:19am [+]

Saddam's ego and sloppy rule made him the ultimate lame duck in the Mid East. Plus, he wasn't a fundamentalist. The genocide, debauchery and economic oppression that his government practiced could not be kept quiet in the international community. Other Muslim countries have the diplomatic sense to cooperate with us on the face because of trade and because they know it insures their survival. The U.S. is now wise to this subterfuge and it's counterbalancing it by quietly seeking to completely transform the Middle East into a completely democratic region. We wouldn' have had to force this transformation if the fundamentalists hadn't pushed sharia into the international arena...and you know started immigrating terrorists to are country, and you know...kill 3,000 Americans.
by supposablethumbs on Thu Jun 24, 04 12:28am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved